After Netanyahu's approval of the terms of Trump's plan to end the war in Gaza, which began with the events of October 7, 2023, and continues to this day, President Trump’s decision to propose it came. This decision by Donald Trump also followed his meeting with several Arab and Islamic leaders in New York on the sidelines of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly. Before I delve into reading and analyzing the terms of the plan proposed by President Trump, it is worth noting that Trump gave Hamas a specific deadline of four or five days to respond to it.
It is now practically evident that there is a necessity for seriousness in studying Trump's proposed plan to end the conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, which has exhausted the people of Gaza and negatively affected the neighboring countries economically due to the repercussions of this ongoing war, especially since its results are also connected to the tragedy of the humanitarian situation in Gaza, alongside the destruction of vast areas in Gaza and the displacement of its people, who have lost many of their homes and residential areas, as well as institutions and service infrastructure, which have been significantly destroyed. They also suffer from the presence of mines and unexploded ordnance, which will require a long time before entering the reconstruction phase in these currently afflicted areas.
The essence of the terms of this proposed peace plan is to stop the war, making the plan essentially a source of relief for the residents of the sector who cannot bear the continuation of this war, as their patience has run out living under the difficult conditions they currently face. The question here is, after Hamas studies the terms of Trump's proposed plan, will the movement accept these proposals to resolve the crisis? Another question is, what are the implications of Hamas not accepting the terms of Trump's proposed plan? I believe that if Hamas does not accept the proposal, according to Trump's perspective, the reaction will be harsh, as I see that he wants to completely and definitively stop this war. Of course, these terms are harsh and completely exclude Hamas and its military presence in the sector in the future, meaning a total freeze of the movement.
In conclusion, Hamas will provide a response that represents it and the Palestinian factions, as they are now in the stage of studying the proposal and holding consultations among themselves, given that President Trump has given them only four or five days to respond to the peace proposal, otherwise their fate will be hell (according to Trump's expressions and statements), who announced that the concerned Arab and Islamic countries have signed this proposal, and we are now waiting for Hamas's response. If they do not agree, the final outcome will be dire. Antonio Guterres, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, has called on all parties to agree to Trump's peace plan for Gaza and to implement its terms, with its main headline being (No place for Hamas in power in Gaza), in return for a gradual withdrawal of Israel after the complete disarmament of Hamas in Gaza, and granting amnesty to Hamas members who will surrender their weapons. The most important issue in these terms is the matter of hostages, which has hindered any previous progress in the negotiations between Hamas and Israel, as the plan includes a clause obligating Hamas to release all hostages within 72 hours of agreeing to the plan, and turning Gaza into a demilitarized zone, followed by a phase of delivering aid to the people of Gaza.
The plan's terms also specify who will govern Gaza in the future, where the interim administration will be the responsibility of a Palestinian committee consisting of technocrats, i.e., non-political members, tasked with providing daily services to the population, who are qualified Palestinians, alongside international experts under the supervision of a new transitional international body called (The Peace Council), headed by Donald Trump and also including leaders and other international figures, including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Additionally, an international force will be formed to establish security and stability, which will be deployed in the Gaza Strip immediately after the announcement of approval and signing of the agreement, tasked with training and supporting (Palestinian police forces), and this will be done in consultation with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and Egypt.
After that, the plan enters the economic aspect, which is of course the most important for President Trump, where (New Gaza) will be established. The plan includes a full commitment to building a prosperous economy there, which will be in a context that imposes peaceful coexistence with its neighbors. The most important point here is that Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza. Here, I refer to what I mentioned in a previous article that the people of Gaza will obtain Palestinian passports, and I believe the time has come for citizens in Gaza to travel like any citizen in this world, and they will also have the right to possess a passport. Additionally, the proposals included the complete reopening of the Rafah crossing, and I believe
OPINIONS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 1:27 pm - Jerusalem Time
Trump's Vision: A Special Global Economic Zone for New Gaza Riviera
OPINIONS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 1:05 pm - Jerusalem Time
From the Illusion of the State to the Horizon of Independence: Education as a Condition for Palestinian Liberation.. A Critical Reading of Dr. Bassem Al-Zubaidi's Article
Dr. Basim Al-Zubaidi wrote an article in the "Jerusalem" newspaper that touches on the essence of the Palestinian predicament: Is the struggle aimed merely at a formally sovereign state, or is it a liberation project that opens a new horizon for historical justice and human dignity? At first glance, his answer seems clear and decisive: a state, if not built on the values of liberation, becomes a political trap or a soulless entity. This idea is correct in principle, but it remains suspended in the void unless translated into a tangible political project.
Al-Zubaidi cleverly captures the predicament of reducing the Palestinian struggle to the "two-state solution" and points out its dangers: a besieged state, fragmented, without real sovereignty, and its tools inherited from the colonial control system. However, his article quickly slips into an abstract discourse that drowns in grand values (justice, freedom, dignity) without providing a cognitive or political plan to transition from analysis to action.
The problem with the article lies not in what it proposes but in what it overlooks: how do we strike a balance between the universal dream and the material reality filled with siege, division, and structural Palestinian weakness?
The importance of what Al-Zubaidi says lies in his transfer of the Palestinian cause to a universal arena, where it becomes a criterion to test the world's sincerity towards liberation issues. But here too lies the danger of universal discourse: if it is not linked to the Palestinian reality, the Palestinian becomes merely a symbol in the book of global philosophy, while remaining a prisoner of the wall, the settlement, and the military checkpoint. Universality without local rooting turns into an intellectual luxury that satisfies the intellectual but does not change reality.
From my perspective, there are two illusions that haunt the Palestinian today:
• The illusion of the state: the belief that mere recognition or raising a flag is enough to achieve independence. This is what Al-Zubaidi warned against, and he is right.
• The illusion of universality: the belief that the Palestinian cause, when presented as a global humanitarian issue, will be sufficient to impose justice. This is an illusion no less dangerous, as it ignores the material balance of power and the actual ability to change realities.
Liberation is not achieved by universal slogans alone, but by the Palestinian's ability to rebuild his national project on solid political and organizational foundations, balancing between the discourse of universal justice and local resilience needs.
Independence is neither an ideal dream nor a formal shell. It is a dialectical project:
• It needs a universal discourse that exposes colonialism and places it before the world.
• At the same time, it needs to build realistic resistance institutions, from education to the economy, capable of making the Palestinian an "actor" rather than just a "symbol."
Here, education emerges as a central condition for liberation. Education is not a secondary social service; it is the infrastructure that creates critical awareness and graduates a generation capable of resisting colonialism intellectually before being militarily or politically.
• The experience of the prisoners' movement is a good example: prisoners turned the occupation's cells into alternative universities and wrote a global model of how education can become a strategic weapon that solidifies identity and keeps memory alive.
• Education is also the only tool capable of connecting the universal with the local: through it, the Palestinian can address the world in a universal legal and intellectual language while maintaining his national roots and field priorities.
In other words, we cannot envision a horizon of true independence without placing education at the heart of the liberation project: education that liberates the mind from dependency and reproduces the Palestinian as a cognitive, political, and moral force.
Dr. Basim Al-Zubaidi's article succeeds in dismantling the most dangerous illusions that have lured Palestinians for decades: the illusion of the formal state. But it simultaneously opens up to another illusion: the illusion of abstract universality. Between these two illusions, the Palestinian needs a new philosophy of independence that recognizes that liberation is not achieved through romantic discourse or political deals, but by reproducing the Palestinian self as a cognitive, political, and moral force capable of asserting its existence despite all conditions of oppression.
Here, education stands out as the backbone of this project: it equips the Palestinian with tools for critique and resistance, transforming the horizon of universal justice into a practical project rooted in the land. There is no independence without awareness, and no awareness without liberating education, formulated as part of the struggle rather than as cultural luxury.
Critique, then, is not a diminishment of Al-Zubaidi's proposal, but a call to complete it: to move beyond the realm of slogans and to place the horizon of independence in a practical
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 12:26 pm - Jerusalem Time
Ambiguity surrounds Hamas's position.. Conflicting media reports about acceptance and rejection of the "Trump Plan" while the movement remains silent.
As the world anxiously awaits Hamas's official response to Trump's 'plan' to end the war in Gaza, and in light of the short deadline and the threats issued by the American president, a state of ambiguity and contradiction has prevailed in the media scene, with completely conflicting reports leaking about the movement's position, without any official statement to resolve the debate so far.
The Saudi newspaper 'Asharq Al-Awsat' reported that sources within Hamas said that leaders in the movement, supported by the military wing's leadership, have asked the political leadership abroad to study the proposal 'positively' with the aim of ending the war. This direction is supported by other reports, as the American network 'CBS News' quoted an informed source stating that the movement 'leans towards approval' and that it will respond today or tomorrow.
In stark contrast, other reports emerged indicating a firm rejection of key terms in the plan. The 'BBC' network quoted a source in Hamas stating that the movement completely rejects any proposal that includes disarming it, considering the idea of deploying an international force in Gaza as 'a new form of occupation.' The 'Asharq Al-Awsat' report itself also indicated the existence of another current within Hamas, including elements from the military wing, who see the plan as merely a 'trick' and strongly oppose it.
Amid this contradiction, Hamas has not issued any official and final response. Sources close to the movement confirmed that they will work on an official response as soon as possible after consultations with all Palestinian factions are completed. For his part, the Qatari Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, confirmed that Hamas 'has dealt responsibly and promised to study the plan,' noting that the proposal achieves a key goal of ending the war, but includes issues that need clarification and negotiation.
President Donald Trump had clarified the details of his plan regarding the Gaza Strip in agreement with the occupying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Hamas has not issued any official and final response so far, which increases the ambiguity surrounding its position.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 12:17 pm - Jerusalem Time
Jerusalem in September.. Loud violations at Al-Aqsa and collective punishments
The month of September did not pass without severe violations carried out by the Israeli occupation as part of a systematic policy to empty Jerusalem of its residents. Most of the violations documented this month can be categorized under the umbrella of "collective punishment."
Collective punishments were imposed on about 70,000 Palestinians living in the villages located northwest of Jerusalem, following the martyrdom of two young men from the villages of Qabiba and Qatna, which belong to this geography, after a shooting operation they carried out on the morning of the 8th of last month in the settlement neighborhood of "Ramot."
The operation resulted in the death of 7 Israelis and injuries to more than 15 others, while the two perpetrators, Muthna Amro (20 years old) and Muhammad Taha (21 years old), were martyred, and the occupation authorities continue to hold their bodies in freezers.
Following the operation, the occupation decided to impose collective punishments on the residents of the areas northwest of Jerusalem, starting with the closure of what is known as the "Biddu Tunnel" leading to it, followed by a massive arrest campaign that coincided with the storming of most citizens' homes, especially in the villages of Qabiba and Qatna, and culminating in the demolition of the home of one of the perpetrators, Muthna Amro.
Unprecedented measures and punishments cannot be separated from the decision to classify both the villages of Nabi Samuel and Beit Iksa and the Khalayla neighborhood as contact areas, which were part of the collective punishments targeting Palestinians during the past month. The process of issuing special cards and permits for residents of these areas began, and entry will only be allowed for holders of these permits.
In Al-Aqsa Mosque, violations continued to be carried out by the occupation police on one side and leaders of the Temple groups and their supporters on the other. Throughout the month, 5,050 extremists entered the courtyards, and incursions were carried out on the occasion of the Hebrew New Year over three days, during which 1,317 settlers stormed the mosque.
During their celebration of this holiday, the extremists deliberately blew the shofar inside the courtyards of the first qibla 5 times, in addition to singing, group dancing, performing prayers, and collectively performing the epic prostration ritual. Some of the intruders were keen to wear "repentance" white clothes, which Jewish law stipulates should be worn during the first ten days of the year as they are "days of repentance."
This clothing reinforces the imposition of the biblical identity in Al-Aqsa, which is the main goal of its repeated wearing by the intruders at all times of the year, not just during these days. This white attire is also one of the outfits worn by the Temple priests throughout the year.
Thus, its imposition in Al-Aqsa serves to pave the way for the presence of the Temple priests in the mosque, as they are the class that leads Jewish prayers in the alleged temple according to the biblical myth. The impact of their presence in Al-Aqsa becomes multiplied, according to researcher on Jerusalem affairs Ziad Abu Heis.
The assaults in Al-Aqsa Mosque were not limited to the celebrations of the Hebrew New Year; violations were recorded throughout the month, including settlers deliberately celebrating the anniversary of the "Bager" operation in Lebanon through a mass incursion during which they commemorated an Israeli soldier killed there.
Extremist Yehuda Glick also led a special incursion to commemorate Charlie Kirk days after his death in America. The "Beit El" organization published a photo of dozens of intruders and wrote, "Dozens prayed yesterday on the Temple Mount in memory of the late Charlie Kirk and for the kidnapped and soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces, as well as for widows and orphans."
At the western wall of the mosque, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stormed the Buraq Square accompanied by Netanyahu, and they performed prayers there. The next day, Rubio participated in the opening of a new section of the "Pilgrims' Path" tunnel that was dug beneath the town of Silwan south of Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Before the Hebrew New Year, extremists blew the shofar inside the courtyards and performed morning and evening prayers, as well as the "Selichot" prayer, which extremists had deliberately begun to perform in Al-Aqsa weeks earlier.
Regarding arrests, 105 arrests were carried out in the Jerusalem governorate, according to Al Jazeera's documentation, affecting 9 minors and two women, with most concentrated in the villages northwest of Jerusalem. The occupation
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 11:56 am - Jerusalem Time
In its first response to the "Trump Plan," Hamas: We reject disarmament and the international force is a "new form of occupation."
In the first clear indication of its stance on the American peace plan, a source within Hamas revealed the movement's outright rejection of two key provisions believed to form the core of the proposal, emphasizing that the movement will not accept disarmament and considers any presence of international forces in Gaza as 'a new form of occupation.'
A source in Hamas was quoted by a network stating that the movement views its weapons as a guarantee against the recurrence of aggression and will not agree to relinquish them under any circumstances.
The source added that the idea of deploying an 'international force' in the sector, which has been mentioned in leaks about the plan, is completely rejected, as the movement sees it as an attempt to impose foreign guardianship and a cover for the continued security control over Gaza.
These statements come at a critical time, just a few days after the movement officially received 'Trump's plan' through intermediaries in Qatar and Egypt, while the world awaits its official response within the timeframe set by the American president.
These points are considered 'red lines' that could complicate the negotiation process and indicate that Hamas will demand substantial amendments to the security provisions in any final agreement.
Hamas sees its weapons as a guarantee against the recurrence of aggression.
LATEST NEWS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 11:10 am - Jerusalem Time
Colonizers cut down more than 300 ancient olive and almond trees in Sa'ir, northeast of Hebron.
Today, Wednesday, colonists cut down more than 200 ancient olive trees and over 100 fruit-bearing almond trees in the town of Sa'ir, northeast of Hebron.
Citizen Issa Muhammad Shalaldeh reported that groups from the "Asfar" and "Kedumim" settlements, established on the town's land, used electric saws to cut and chop the trees in the "Um al-Batam" area of Wadi Sa'ir, completely destroying them.
The trees belong to him and his brother Izzat. It is worth mentioning that colonists from the same settlements burned dozens of dunams planted with grapes, olives, and almonds last month, as part of a series of ongoing assaults aimed at displacing residents from their lands in favor of colonial expansion.
Colonists aim to displace residents from their lands in favor of colonial expansion.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 10:46 am - Jerusalem Time
Among them are children.. Israel kills 22 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday.
The Israeli army has killed 22 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip since dawn on Wednesday, including 19 in the city of Gaza, which it seeks to occupy and displace its citizens.
Dozens more have been injured due to the air and artillery bombardment carried out by the army as part of the genocide it has been committing in the Gaza Strip for two years.
According to eyewitnesses and medical sources, the Israeli airstrikes targeted a school housing displaced persons, as well as homes and civilian gatherings, resulting in dozens of casualties among the dead and injured.
In the Zeitoun neighborhood in southern Gaza City, 10 Palestinians were killed and others were injured, including 7 civil defense officers, as a result of the Israeli army's bombardment of Al-Falah School, which shelters displaced persons.
In the Al-Daraj neighborhood in the eastern part of the city, 7 Palestinians were killed and others were injured due to an Israeli airstrike on an apartment in one of the residential buildings.
In the Al-Rimal neighborhood in the western part of the city, two Palestinians were killed and others were injured after an airstrike targeted a house.
In the Al-Nuseirat camp in central Gaza, two Palestinians were killed and others were injured due to an Israeli bombardment.
Meanwhile, one Palestinian was killed and others were injured in the Al-Bureij camp as a result of a house being targeted by bombardment.
Israel continues, with American support, its genocidal war on Gaza, which has so far resulted in the deaths of 66,097 Palestinians and the injury of 168,536, most of whom are women and children.
Israel continues its genocidal war on Gaza, resulting in the deaths of 66,097 Palestinians.
ARAB AND WORLD
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:41 am - Jerusalem Time
Shift in American Mood Towards Israel: Survey Reveals Decline in Support After Two Years of War in Gaza
Nearly two years after the outbreak of war in Gaza, the results of a new survey conducted by The New York Times in collaboration with Siena College (published Tuesday) reveal a radical shift in American voters' attitudes toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically regarding U.S. support for Israel, the long-standing strategic ally.
The survey, which included 1,313 registered voters across the United States and was conducted from September 22 to 27, 2025, indicates that a significant portion of Americans, particularly among the youth and Democrats, has become more critical of Israel and more sympathetic to the Palestinians – a first since this question was posed in opinion polls in 1998.
A New Sympathy Curve: Palestinians Lead for the First Time
In October 2023, following the attacks carried out by Hamas on Israel in the Al-Aqsa Flood operation, a previous survey showed that 47% of Americans sympathized with Israel compared to only 20% with the Palestinians. However, the picture today has changed; 35% sympathized with the Palestinians compared to 34% with Israel, while 31% said they were either unsure or supported both sides equally.
This shift reflects, as observers see it, a deeper change in the general American mood toward one of the most complex issues in foreign policy, especially in light of the rising scenes of violence and destruction in Gaza and the increasing number of civilian casualties.
A Decline in Support for Military and Economic Aid
The survey also revealed that the majority of American voters now oppose sending additional military and economic aid to Israel, marking a notable shift since the October 7 attacks. Sixty percent of respondents stated that Israel should halt its military operation, even if hostages are not released or Hamas is not eliminated.
Forty percent of participants said that Israel "is deliberately killing civilians in Gaza," a figure that has nearly doubled compared to the 2023 survey. A large number of participants also expressed the belief that the Israeli army does not take sufficient precautions to avoid civilian casualties.
Testimonies from Voters Who Changed Their Stance
Austin Mogliston, a 33-year-old Democrat from Idaho, said he was previously a strong supporter of Israel, especially after the October 7 attacks. However, he added, "With the length of the war and what Israel is doing to the Palestinians, it no longer seems equitable."
Shannon Carey, a Democrat from Connecticut and a mother working as a physician's assistant, described the Israeli attacks as "unreasonable" and called for an end to U.S. military and financial support, saying, "As a mother, seeing these children is terrifying. This is not a war. It is genocide."
Clear Party Division: Democrats Shift, Republicans Retreat
The most apparent shift came from Democratic voters. While Democrats were divided two years ago (34% with Israel and 31% with the Palestinians), today 54% express greater sympathy for the Palestinians, compared to only 13% who still support Israel.
More than 80% of Democrats also expressed a desire for Israel to stop its war even if it does not achieve its objectives. About 60% of Democrats believe that Israel is deliberately killing civilians.
In contrast, Republicans still support Israel by a clear majority, with 64% saying they sympathize with it compared to 9% with the Palestinians. However, this support has declined by 12% compared to 2023.
The newspaper attributes to Republican Edward Johnson from Minneapolis, who described himself as a "Trump supporter," his statement: "Israelis can rely on themselves, but we need to make sure they are not facing this alone," which is symbolic language suggesting that support should stop.
The Young Generation at the Heart of the Shift
The survey also showed that voters under the age of thirty are the least supportive of Israel, with about 70% opposing any additional aid. This trend includes young people from both parties, indicating a decline in the traditional popular support for Israeli backing in the United States.
Notably, the largest shift came from an unexpected segment: "older, educated white Democrats," who until recently were among the strongest supporters of Israel within the Democratic Party.
Future Challenges for the U.S.-Israeli Alliance
Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has been the largest recipient of U.S. aid, receiving hundreds of billions of dollars. However, the results of this survey indicate that this reality may change, given the decline in popular support that could cast a shadow over official policies, especially if the conflict continues and the number of civilian casualties in Gaza increases.
Experts believe that the issue of U.S. support for Israel may become a central point of discussion among parties, as
ANALYSIS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:41 am - Jerusalem Time
Netanyahu and the Deception of Peace: Why Trump's Plan for Gaza Seems Like a Political Illusion
A close reading of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stance on the "peace" plan proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding Gaza reveals that the plan is nothing more than a political maneuver aimed at buying time and polishing Israel's image before the international community. Despite being promoted as a roadmap to end the war and achieve a "comprehensive solution to the conflict," as stated by Trump, its provisions appear blatantly biased in favor of Israeli interests, while offering the Palestinians nothing substantial regarding sovereignty, justice, or the right to self-determination.
The plan includes a gradual ceasefire, a conditional withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces, and the disarmament of Hamas and its removal from power in Gaza. However, these provisions are rendered meaningless when viewed alongside the conditions for implementation and Netanyahu's public statements, as he continues to reject the principle of establishing a Palestinian state. Despite announcing his support for the plan, he insists on maintaining full Israeli security control over Gaza and its surroundings, which practically means that any settlement will be under the guise of Israeli occupation, rather than a fair or balanced agreement.
Many analysts believe that Netanyahu's acceptance of the plan does not stem from a conviction in a political solution, but rather from his need to alleviate the political pressures he faces domestically due to ongoing protests and declining popularity, in addition to rising international criticism of the Israeli aggression against Gaza. In this context, the plan gives Netanyahu the appearance of a leader open to solutions, without requiring him to make any actual concessions. It emphasizes the conditions imposed on the Palestinians while simultaneously maintaining Israeli military and political dominance.
What further undermines the fragility of this plan is the complete exclusion of Palestinians from its formulation. No official or factional Palestinian entity was consulted in its preparation, prompting Hamas and several Palestinian factions to consider it a biased initiative that does not rise to the level of a peace initiative. Additionally, the amended plan has sparked significant discontent among several Arab countries, which expressed concern over the absence of any guarantees to protect Palestinian rights or to put an end to the ongoing displacement and aggression against Gaza for the past two years.
Media reports, notably what was published by Axios, revealed that the version announced by Trump at the White House on September 29, 2025, differs significantly from the one circulated with several Arab leaders during the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 23, on the sidelines of the General Assembly. According to leaks, the original version included guarantees against the annexation of the occupied West Bank, as well as references to the possibility of establishing a Palestinian state in the future. However, the amendments made later, at the direct request of Netanyahu and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, completely eliminated these provisions and instead focused on issues such as ceasefire, prisoner exchanges, dismantling Hamas's rule, and disarming it.
These sudden amendments provoked widespread anger among Arab allies, who viewed them as a denial of initial understandings and a serious retreat from the principles that have long formed the basis for any fair settlement, foremost among them the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. According to the North Star newspaper, Qatar warned the White House against announcing the plan in its amended form without consulting the partner countries and requested a postponement of the announcement, but the U.S. administration ignored these demands and proceeded with presenting the plan tailored to Israeli demands.
In a more controversial development, the final plan did not include any reference to the establishment of a Palestinian state, but rather gave Hamas a short period to accept its conditions, resembling an ultimatum under the threat of "severe consequences" in case of refusal. This shift in tone and content has revived old doubts about whether U.S. "peace plans" are political pressure tools aimed at rearranging the facts on the ground to serve Israeli interests, rather than serious initiatives to resolve the conflict.
In the absence of any addressing of core issues—such as ending the occupation, the right of return, and holding Israel accountable for war crimes—the Trump plan can only be viewed as a blatant attempt to reproduce the status quo. Behind the misleading diplomatic rhetoric lies an intention to perpetuate war and entrench dominance, rather than a roadmap to just peace, as it is promoted. Thus, serious questions arise about the credibility of any initiative that does not start from a clear acknowledgment of Palestinian rights and does not put an end to the conflict.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:36 am - Jerusalem Time
Ehud Barak: Netanyahu's statement about demolishing buildings in Gaza to prevent the return of residents is a "war crime."
In a direct and explicit accusation, former Prime Minister of the occupying entity, Ehud Barak, described the current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement regarding the demolition of buildings in the Gaza Strip as amounting to a "war crime."
This came during Barak's talk on the occupying army's radio, where he sharply criticized what Netanyahu revealed about the aim of the destruction operations in the sector.
Barak clarified that this description arises because Netanyahu linked the demolition operations to the goal of preventing Palestinian residents from returning to their homes and areas.
Netanyahu's statement regarding the demolition of buildings in Gaza constitutes a war crime.
OPINIONS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:34 am - Jerusalem Time
The American-Israeli Plan: Between Extortion and Liquidation
Just a week ago, official speeches were filled with talk of "diplomatic victories" and "recognition of the Palestinian state," as if reality had suddenly changed. Some leaders promoted the idea that victory was near and that joy was just around the corner.
But we quickly awoke to a joint announcement between Trump and Netanyahu, bringing us back to square one and revealing the fragility of our political illusions. A plan imposed without discussion, enforced by the balance of power rather than legal and just arguments, placing Palestinians before two bitter choices: either accept a systematic political liquidation or face ongoing extermination.
Despite the diplomatic language with which Trump wrapped his plan, its essence is clear: no right to self-determination, no Palestinian sovereignty, and no real prospect for a state. What is being proposed is a form of new mandate, under international management, with regional approval, while maintaining Israeli security and military dominance over the land, and stripping resistance of any capacity or legitimacy.
The most dangerous aspect is that the plan is marketed as an "opportunity for peace," while in reality it is an attempt to exploit the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza to liquidate what remains of the Palestinian national project. There is no equality in rights, no guarantees to stop assaults, and no serious talk about ending the occupation. All that exists are promises to deliver aid and conditional reconstruction, in exchange for dismantling the identity of the Gaza Strip and its political and military resistance.
The disappointment has not only come from the terms of the plan but also from the Arab and Islamic reception of it. Some major countries in the region rushed to bless it, under the banner of "stopping the war," as if stopping the killing should come at a political price paid by the victim.
This slip in the official Arab position is not new, but at this moment it seems more blatant than ever. The Palestinian cause, which was once the central issue for Arabs, is now reduced to a humanitarian crisis that can be resolved with one-sided political concessions, while Israel is exempt from any commitment or accountability.
Internally, the Palestinian arena continues to suffer from division and fragmentation, and from the absence of a unified stance and effective leadership. The state of paralysis experienced by the Palestinian street is not a recent phenomenon, but rather the result of years of depletion and division, where the issue is managed through individualism, formal conferences, and closed rooms that do not represent the popular mood or aspirations.
People in Gaza have been bleeding for two years under a systematic extermination war, and the political scene remains trapped in a cycle of paralysis and mutual accusations. Between the leadership's impotence, the international community's inaction, and the complicity of some Arab parties, the Palestinian today seems alone in facing a battle for existence, not just a political battle.
Hamas today stands at a dangerous crossroads. Accepting the plan is read as surrender, while rejecting it translates into an escalation of war and continuation of the massacre. However, between absolute acceptance and absolute rejection, there is room for legitimate political maneuvering, provided that the goal is to protect Palestinians and preserve the dignity of the national project, not to maintain authority or party positions.
Having courage here does not mean yielding, but rather the ability to make a complex decision that balances stopping extermination and avoiding national collapse. This requires Hamas not to remain alone in confrontation but to push towards a unified Palestinian stance that rejects liquidation and proposes realistic alternatives based on protecting the Palestinian person and their political rights.
The American plan, despite all its tragedies, is not a predetermined fate; Palestinians have previously thwarted dozens of liquidation projects, from the Balfour Declaration to the Deal of the Century. But rejecting this plan will not happen through mere condemnation statements, but through rebuilding genuine national unity, a comprehensive political discourse, and activating tools of popular and international struggle. Time no longer allows for more political luxury or bickering. What is required today is a responsible stance, commensurate with the blood being shed and the magnitude of the cause we are on the verge of losing due to our divisions and dispersal.
Stopping extermination is a national and moral priority, but it should not be used as a pretext for liquidating the cause. Likewise, adherence to resistance should not turn into an excuse for passing massacres.
What we see today is not just a plan, but an attempt to impose a new reality: Gaza without resistance, without representation, under external guardianship. But just as previous plans have failed, this one can also be thwarted if Palestinians possess the courage of stance and unity of ranks. History is not written only by the strong, but by those who have the will
LATEST NEWS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:26 am - Jerusalem Time
The occupation storms the center of Jenin and opens fire with live ammunition.
Jenin 1-10-2025 - Israeli occupation forces stormed the center of Jenin city this morning, Wednesday.
Our correspondent reported that Israeli infantry units stormed the main roundabout in the city and fired live ammunition at citizens, while soldiers spread in the area of the market, disrupting the movement of citizens and vehicles.
The Israeli aggression on the city and camp of Jenin has been ongoing since January 21 of last year, amidst a state of tension and continuous military presence.
Israeli occupation forces stormed the center of Jenin city this morning, Wednesday.
OPINIONS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:17 am - Jerusalem Time
American-Israeli initiative
Trump's initiative is not typical in its aim to achieve a ceasefire, a gradual Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the release of Palestinian prisoners, the non-expulsion of residents from their homeland, the introduction of food and health aid, and the tools necessary for debris removal. These are crucial issues vital to the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and serve as pressing factors for Hamas, other factions, and the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah to accept this initiative, despite its heavy political costs for both sides of the Palestinian equation: 1- the Authority in Ramallah, 2- Hamas, and the Islamic Jihad movement in the Gaza Strip, which is the only one that has declared its rejection of the American plan.
Trump's initiative and its American-Israeli criteria seek to serve the Israeli colony and extricate it from the bottleneck it has placed itself in due to its repeated, deliberate, systematic crimes against Palestinian civilians and its involvement in acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing. This has led Europe, both publicly and officially, to detach itself from supporting the colony, condemn it, vote against it, and shift towards supporting and backing the Palestinian people politically by recognizing the Palestinian state and the right of the Palestinian people to independence and freedom, as well as providing financial and supportive aid to cover their essential needs.
Washington also seeks to remove the colony from the description of failure and defeat towards a description of political achievement, despite Israel's inability to achieve its three war objectives: 1- eliminating resistance, which it has failed to do, 2- releasing Israeli prisoners, which it has failed to do, 3- expelling, displacing, and relocating the people of the Gaza Strip outside their homeland, which it has failed to do.
Trump's initiative does not speak of restoring Gaza's freedom and choices but will keep it besieged by occupation forces as it was before October 7, 2023. It excludes any role for Hamas and the Palestinian Authority in managing the Gaza Strip, does not mention the West Bank and Jerusalem and their fate, talks about temporary phases, and does not approach the required conclusions represented by the complete departure of the occupation from the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.
The exclusion of the Authority and Hamas from the mandatory future, considering them the leadership of the Palestinian people, through unity, partnership, and ballot boxes, and through establishing the tools of the right to self-determination, the retreat and elimination of the occupation, the removal of settlements, and their departure, and the seizure of freedom and independence and the return of refugees.
The pressing factors on Trump and the Israeli colony are: 1- Israeli demonstrations against the war, 2- the failure of the occupation forces to achieve their goals in the Gaza Strip, 3- positive developments in the European position in favor of Palestine, 4- the Arab-Islamic summit meeting of the eight leaders with President Trump, have not yielded enough for him to respond to the conditions, demands, and rights of the Palestinians genuinely.
Trump will not yield anything beneficial to the Palestinian people, no matter how strong the pressing factors are to change his positions in support of the colony, because his repelling factors in favor of the colony are stronger than the pressing factors on him in favor of Palestine. This is due to the results of the October 7 battle and its repercussions, which were not decisive in favor of the Palestinians, despite Palestinian steadfastness, whether from the population or from the resistance factions.
In any case, the political scene will remain open and exposed as long as the battle of October 7 and its repercussions have not achieved a decisive outcome for either side of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 9:02 am - Jerusalem Time
The future of Gaza Strip after Trump's plan.. Challenges of international guardianship and separation from national identity.
Dr. Hassan Ayoub: The plan is a lifeline for Netanyahu's government, which is isolated internationally and politically, and if implemented, the Gaza Strip will not be part of the Palestinian entity.
Aouni Al-Mashni: The Gaza Strip will face enormous challenges in the reconstruction phase, but that will not stop the process of revival, even if it requires strenuous effort and more time.
Dr. Aql Salah: The plan practically aims to impose international guardianship over Gaza, keeping it under direct supervision of Israel and allied international parties.
Dr. Mohammed Al-Tamawi: The future of the Gaza Strip cannot be determined by imposed plans but by an Arab will and vision that ensure the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Sari Samour: A unified stance must be formed that includes all factions and the authority to respond collectively to the plan, away from bickering and assigning responsibilities.
Dr. Wala Qadimat: The plan did not carry a timeline for returning the Gaza Strip to Palestinian management, making it closer to the recolonization of Gaza and imposing guardianship over it.
The plan announced by U.S. President Donald Trump represents a critical turning point for the future of the Gaza Strip, fraught with the risks of separating the framework of the unified Palestinian entity, turning it into a geographically and politically separate area from the West Bank, in line with the "Gaza Riviera" project previously announced by Trump, in addition to imposing international guardianship over the Strip.
The plan essentially reflects a recycling of the concepts of the previous Kushner–Tony Blair plan, with minor adjustments to give it an appearance of international and regional support, but in reality, it represents a lifeline for the Israeli government at a moment of political and international weakness, amid a global undermining of Israel's legitimacy due to the crimes committed in the Palestinian territories, especially in Gaza.
Writers, political analysts, specialists, and university professors confirm in separate conversations with "Y" that Trump's plan reveals the limited role of the Palestinians, both politically and administratively, while Israel retains a buffer zone that ensures its continued control over more land, turning Gaza into a smaller political and geographical space, isolated from the Palestinian Authority and the unified Palestinian entity, amid fears of voluntary migration, which could lead to a large exodus of the population under difficult humanitarian conditions and reconstruction challenges, in addition to details within the plan itself that make its implementation fraught with risks.
Writers, analysts, specialists, and university professors believe that the future of the Gaza Strip will not be determined solely by American-Israeli plans, but by a unified Arab will and a genuine Palestinian vision that ensures the preservation of geographical and political unity with the West Bank and Jerusalem, and protects Palestinian rights.
They agree that any plan imposed on Gaza without clear guarantees, and that entrenches division and guardianship, remains a complicated plan to implement, and that the real solution will only be achieved through the strength and will of the Palestinians, and a supportive Arab stance that ensures the achievement of a just and comprehensive peace, and opens the horizon for political dialogue away from piecemeal experiments or temporary humanitarian files, while preserving the unity of the land and the Palestinian national project.
Modification of the Kushner–Blair Plan Framework
Political science professor and American affairs specialist Dr. Hassan Ayoub considers that U.S. President Donald Trump's plan essentially represents a modification of the framework of the previous Kushner–Tony Blair plan, with slight adjustments that make it appear to have broad international and regional support, but in reality, it represents a lifeline for the Israeli government at a moment of political and international weakness, amid a global undermining of Israel's legitimacy due to the crimes it has committed in the Palestinian territories, especially in the Gaza Strip.
Ayoub clarifies that any international or regional consensus supporting this plan forces the international community to sit at the negotiating table with an entity accused of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, which represents a fundamental reversal of the historical and political contexts that have not served Israeli interests previously, but today reflect a clear turn in the opposite direction in favor of Tel Aviv.
Ayoub discusses the status of the Gaza Strip within the framework of the plan, pointing out that the basic content has not changed, as the Strip will not be part of the Palestinian entity upon the plan's implementation, which means a permanent and fundamental separation from the West Bank, in alignment with the "Gaza Riviera" project previously announced by Trump.
Ayoub asserts that the plan allows the residents of Gaza to remain, but it opens the door to voluntary migration that could expand to include large numbers under the current circumstances
LATEST NEWS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 8:26 am - Jerusalem Time
Colonizers burn parts of a house in Hawara, south of Nablus.
This morning, Wednesday, colonists set fire to parts of a house in the town of Hawara, south of Nablus.
The head of the Public Relations Department in the Hawara Municipality, Rana Abu Haniya, reported that a group of colonists attacked the home of citizen Abdul Hakim Al-Amar in the Ras Zaid area, southwest of the town, and set part of it (the porch) on fire, causing material damage to the place.
She added that the area has been witnessing ongoing land leveling and repeated assaults by colonists, targeting the homes of citizens near the new settlement outpost established there.
The area has been witnessing ongoing land leveling and repeated assaults by colonists.
LATEST NEWS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 8:16 am - Jerusalem Time
17 dead since midnight in the ongoing aggression of the occupation on the Gaza Strip.
Seventeen citizens have been martyred since midnight until this Wednesday morning, as a result of a series of airstrikes and shelling by the occupation forces targeting various areas in the Gaza Strip.
Emergency and ambulance sources reported that three citizens were martyred in airstrikes that targeted two homes in the Al-Nuseirat and Al-Bureij camps in the central Gaza Strip, while another citizen was martyred and several civil defense personnel were injured due to direct shelling by the occupation forces while they were attempting to evacuate casualties from the bombing of Al-Falah School, which was sheltering displaced persons in the Al-Zeitoun neighborhood southeast of Gaza City.
The body of martyr Hosni Abu Hweishal arrived at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, following the targeting of a residential apartment in the Al-Bureij camp in the central Gaza Strip.
In the Al-Daraj neighborhood in the center of Gaza City, dozens of explosive devices dropped by the occupation's drones of the 'quadcopter' type exploded on the rooftops of citizens' homes, causing significant material damage.
The occupation's aircraft also bombed a residential apartment on Al-Thawra Street in the Al-Rimal neighborhood west of Gaza City, resulting in injuries, while other citizens were injured due to the targeting of a house on Al-Thalathini Street in the Al-Sabra neighborhood south of the city.
Additionally, health statistics showed that the month of September 2025 alone witnessed the martyrdom of 2,106 citizens in the Gaza Strip, distributed as follows: North of the Strip: 1,382 martyrs, Central Strip: 347 martyrs, South of the Strip: 377 martyrs.
Seventeen citizens have been martyred since midnight as a result of a series of airstrikes and shelling by the occupation forces.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 8:12 am - Jerusalem Time
Duran: Israel will not be able to hide its crimes by targeting journalists.
The head of the communication department in the Turkish presidency, Burhanettin Duran, confirmed that the Israeli administration must know that with its systematic attacks against journalists, it will never be able to prevent the publication of the truth or hide its crimes against humanity and genocide.
This came in a condolence message published by Duran on his account on the Turkish platform "In Social" on Tuesday evening, following the killing of journalist Yahya Barzaq due to an Israeli attack in the Gaza Strip.
Duran stated: "Independent journalist Yahya Barzaq, who conveys to the world the genocide being carried out by Israel in Gaza on behalf of TRT Channel, was martyred in an airstrike carried out by the perpetrators of genocide."
He added: "Yahya, whose story we witnessed in the documentary film (Gaza Remains in My Pictures) produced by TRT World, has become etched in our memory as a brave voice seeking the truth amid occupation and injustice."
Duran emphasized that this "brutal entity" adds a new war crime to its daily crimes, and it will be judged not only by the conscience of humanity but also before international law.
He continued: "The Israeli administration must know that with its systematic attacks on journalists, it will never be able to prevent the publication of the truth or hide its crimes against humanity and genocide."
Duran prayed for mercy for journalist Barzaq and expressed his condolences to his family, loved ones, and the TRT family.
Barzaq was killed due to an Israeli attack targeting civilians near the "Environmental Street" intersection west of Deir al-Balah city, which resulted in the deaths of 5 other Palestinians.
With American support, Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza since October 7, 2023, resulting in 66,097 deaths and 168,536 injuries, most of whom are children and women, and a famine that claimed the lives of 453 Palestinians, including 150 children.
With its systematic attacks on journalists, it will never be able to prevent the publication of the truth or hide its crimes against humanity.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 7:44 am - Jerusalem Time
Starvation as a Biological Weapon: The Occupation's Strategy Against Gaza
The comprehensive cutting off of food and essential supplies in the Gaza Strip is not separate from its contextual and historical dimension, and its initial signs did not emerge as a reaction to the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation on October 7, 2023, but rather represents a trend adopted by the leaders of the occupation since 2006 after Hamas won the legislative elections.
Documents revealed in 2008 calculated the number of calories for Gazans and specified the number of trucks allowed to enter since that time. At that time, statements were published by Israeli officials referring to what was called "the dietary regimen for Palestinians, without starving them to death, but keeping them in a state of continuous deprivation," as attributed to Dov Weissglass, an advisor in the Prime Minister's office at the time.
Many historical examples abound regarding the use of starvation as a political and military weapon aimed at breaking the will of peoples and paralyzing their ability to endure and resist, just as occurred in the "Holodomor" in Ukraine (1932-1933), where nearly 4 million Ukrainians perished, and as happened during the Siege of Leningrad (1941-1945), where approximately one million people died out of a total of 3 million.
From the womb of these historical examples, one can trace the same motives in the reality of Gaza today, where evidence shows that Israel seeks to place Palestinians within a deadly hunger coercion, hoping to influence their will and political choices, even forcing them to leave their land. Is the occupation attempting to break the will of Palestinians through a biological approach after failing to exert military pressure on them?
Biopolitics forms the framework for understanding how political power exercises control over the biological life of populations, as theorized by French philosopher Michel Foucault in his lectures at the Collège de France (1975-1976), later published under the title "Society Must Be Defended."
Foucault argues that modern power exerts its dominance by managing life itself, through precise control over basic biological processes such as birth, illness, nutrition, and health. Giorgio Agamben took this concept further in his book "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life," where he examined the sovereign endeavor to reduce humans to their mere biological existence, stripped of their human and political rights.
In this way, power decides which individuals are recognized as belonging to the community of political beings and which are classified solely in terms of their biological reality.
Agamben addresses the basis of this distinction using the two terms employed by the Greeks to differentiate between forms of life: zoē, meaning "natural reproductive life" confined to the private sphere, and bios, meaning "a specific form of life," or political life.
In the context of Gaza, this manifests in a more horrific form, where hunger is used not only to strip Palestinians of their political will but also as a tool to control their bodies and disrupt their vital functions, paving the way for controlling their behavior and decisions.
Thus, the basic biological need has transformed into a political weapon targeting collective will.
Studies indicate the brain's need for glucose as a primary energy source, and that a sharp decline in its levels during prolonged food deprivation leads to a comprehensive disruption in executive and cognitive functions, alongside a loss of balance and weakened motivation and drive due to a lack of essential nutrients such as amino acids and vitamins, as confirmed by brain chemistry research.
Research also shows that extreme hunger is associated with a noticeable decline in concentration, memory, and attention, generating cognitive biases that push individuals to make short-term decisions leaning towards immediate gratification based on essential survival needs, driving them into a state akin to immediate obsession, stripped of the ability to plan long-term or focus on moral issues.
The Minnesota starvation experiment (1944-1945), the results of which were published in the book "The Biology of Human Hunger," subjected 36 healthy young volunteers from Europe to partial starvation for six months. The result was a decline in their mental performance, and they became consumed with food obsessions all the time, leaving little room in their minds for other issues.
Many participants in the experiment, conducted during World War II, fell prey to acute apathy, with a clear decline in their ability to think and plan, and their extreme hunger reached a point where their decision-making process became nearly paralyzed.
Moreover, recent studies in neuroscience indicate the effect of hunger on the activity of brain regions responsible for memory and planning. Neuroimaging studies have shown that hunger is associated with changes in blood flow and neural activity in the hippocampus, responsible for memory formation, and the prefrontal cortex, responsible for future planning.
When the brain is
LATEST NEWS
Wed 01 Oct 2025 7:42 am - Jerusalem Time
Two dead as a school housing displaced persons in Gaza is targeted, and the occupation announces the closure of Al-Rasheed Street.
Two dead and two others were injured this morning, Wednesday, due to the targeting of the Israeli occupation forces at Al-Falah School, which shelters displaced persons in the Zaitoun neighborhood southeast of Gaza City. They were transferred to the Baptist Hospital in the city.
The occupation army announced in a statement the closure of Al-Rasheed Street from the southern side of the Gaza Strip starting at 12:00 PM, clarifying that movement southward will be available for those who were unable to evacuate Gaza City earlier.
Since October 7, 2023, the Israeli occupation has continued to commit massacres against our people in the Gaza Strip, resulting so far in 66,097 dead and 168,536 injured, the majority of whom are children and women, in addition to the death of 453 citizens, including 150 children, due to famine.
The targeting of the Israeli occupation forces at Al-Falah School, which shelters displaced persons in the Zaitoun neighborhood.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 7:00 am - Jerusalem Time
The occupation issues a warning to the residents of Gaza.. Closure of Al-Rasheed Street at noon and calls for immediate evacuation.
The occupying army issued a new and urgent warning to the remaining residents of Gaza City and northern Gaza, demanding that they evacuate immediately to the southern areas.
The occupation specified in its statement a deadline that ends at exactly twelve noon, during which the Al-Rasheed Street will be completely closed to traffic.
The statement added that during this limited time window, civilians will be allowed to move "freely and without inspection."
This warning is considered an escalation in the policy of forced displacement.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 6:46 am - Jerusalem Time
3 False Claims by Trump in His Announcement of the Plan Regarding Gaza and Hamas
The statements made by U.S. President Donald Trump during the press conference he held with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday, Monday, at the White House, which included the announcement of the outlines of his plan regarding Gaza, were not free from factually unsupported claims about the sector.
During the conference, Trump raised three pieces of misinformation regarding the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, accusations of corruption against UNRWA, and the number of Palestinian fighters who have been martyred since the "Al-Aqsa Flood" attack on October 7, 2023.
Trump has consistently made false statements throughout his two terms in office, whether on social media platforms or in press conferences, which has made many of them the subject of widespread criticism from the media and political figures.
The U.S. president claimed in his speech that the election of the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) marked a turning point that led Israel to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, believing—according to his narrative—that this step would open the door to a phase of calm and peace.
He added that Israel, at that time, told the Palestinians, "Take Gaza, this is our contribution to peace," but he quickly noted that what happened later was not as they expected, as the promised peace was not achieved; rather, it was, in his words, the exact opposite.
However, the truth is that Israel implemented a unilateral disengagement plan from Gaza in 2005, evacuating settlements in the sector and others in the West Bank, while withdrawing Israeli forces from Gaza.
At that time, Israel claimed that the declared goal of this step was to enhance the peace process with the Palestinians, but many observers considered that the withdrawal was not a step toward peace; rather, it was an attempt to reduce Israel's commitments in Gaza without negotiating with the Palestinian Authority, which led to strengthening Hamas's position among the Palestinians.
In 2006, Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections, leading to the formation of a government under its leadership, but in 2007, clashes broke out between Hamas and the Fatah National Liberation Movement, ending with the former taking control of the Gaza Strip, resulting in a division of the Palestinian Authority between the West Bank and Gaza.
The Israeli withdrawal from Gaza was not driven by direct expectations of peace; rather, it was part of a unilateral Israeli strategy, and Hamas's victory in the elections was unexpected and came after the Israeli withdrawal, not before it, in addition to not being part of an Israeli or American plan to achieve peace.
During his speech at the conference, the U.S. president accused the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) of corruption: "I cut taxpayer funding to the corrupt UNRWA."
Trump announced on February 4 of last year his decision to stop funding the agency at the beginning of his second term in the White House, based on accusations of involvement by some of its employees in an attack carried out by Hamas on Israel.
However, a review of these allegations revealed a more complex picture; the results of an internal investigation conducted by UNRWA showed that the accusations involved 19 employees, while the initial evidence was limited to only nine, and even in these cases, their involvement was not conclusively proven.
As for his description of the agency as "corrupt," it was contradicted by an independent review conducted by three prestigious research centers led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna in April 2024, which concluded that UNRWA "has a more developed neutral approach than the majority of UN bodies and similar NGOs."
The U.S. president noted in his speech what he described as significant losses within Hamas, stating that "more than 20,000 have been killed" and that the time has come for the movement to accept "the terms of the plan" presented.
Trump's statement reflects previous Israeli estimates, but they remain questionable due to the lack of independent evidence of their accuracy and doubts about the Israeli army's ability to distinguish between civilians and fighters.
On the other hand, neither Hamas nor its military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, has issued any official statistics on the number of its fighters who have been martyred since the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation about a year ago, making any proposed number require independent verification before being accepted as an objective fact.
It is worth noting that the White House revealed in a statement the details of President Donald Trump's plan to end the war in Gaza, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced his support for the plan, while Hamas promised to study it responsibly.
Following the announcement of the
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 6:30 am - Jerusalem Time
Gaza is being annihilated by bombardment and hunger.. The occupation is expanding its invasion and a political initiative is wavering.
Gaza Under Fire: A Declared Famine and Genocide Amid the Expansion of the Occupation's Assault. With the entry of the aggression on its 726th day, the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip is worsening, as the occupying army continues to escalate its brutal attacks, leaving behind scenes of immense destruction and horrific massacres, amidst a suffocating siege that has compelled the United Nations to officially declare famine for the first time in the Middle East.
In the midst of this genocide, the chapters of a political initiative led by U.S. President Donald Trump are unfolding, while international parties, including Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, pressure Hamas to accept a ceasefire plan, the details and guarantees of which remain a subject of complex negotiations.
A comprehensive genocide and a systematic starvation policy dominate the face of the aggression, where the toll of malnutrition victims has risen to 453 martyrs, including 150 children.
The city is facing comprehensive genocide, and the world is called to immediate action.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 6:18 am - Jerusalem Time
"The Resilience Fleet" declares a state of maximum alert as it approaches Gaza.
Unknown movements in the open sea are prompting the "Fleet of Resilience" to raise its maximum state of alert, just before reaching Gaza.
In a rapid development, the organizers of the "Fleet of Resilience" to break the siege on Gaza announced their return to a state of maximum alert; this is a result of the approach of unidentified ships sailing without lights, among the fleet's vessels in the open sea.
The fleet confirmed in a statement that despite these alarming movements, it continues to sail towards its declared goal, indicating its proximity to the 120 nautical mile mark, which is the area that previously witnessed the interception of similar vessels.
We continue our journey towards the shores of Gaza, despite all attempts to disrupt our course.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 4:02 am - Jerusalem Time
Settler attack disrupts 3 wells and threatens thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank
An attack carried out by Israeli settlers has led to the cessation of operations at 3 water wells relied upon by residents of 19 Palestinian communities near the city of Ramallah in the central West Bank.
The Jerusalem District Water Authority stated in a press release: The repeated attacks by settlers on Tuesday on the water wells in the Ein Samiya area (east of Ramallah) caused the main wells to stop pumping water, threatening to deprive thousands of citizens in more than 19 residential communities of their basic right to water.
The authority, which covers the Ramallah and Jerusalem governorates, indicated that the attack resulted in the cutting of control lines for wells 2, 4, and 6, leading to their complete shutdown.
It noted that its teams are working around the clock to repair the damage and resume water pumping as quickly as possible.
It called on official and international bodies to urgently intervene to stop these daily attacks and ensure the protection of the Palestinian citizens' right to access water as it is their main source of life.
It pointed out that the Ein Samiya wells have been subjected to a series of repeated attacks in recent months, while its teams face significant challenges in reaching the wells and repairing the damage, which exacerbates the water crisis and threatens the water security of dozens of Palestinian communities.
Ein Samiya is one of the most important sources of groundwater in the northeastern Ramallah area, with an estimated total production capacity of about 12,000 cubic meters per day, representing 17% of the daily quantities supplied by the Jerusalem District Water Authority.
The wells are located on the eastern slopes of the West Bank and have witnessed significant settlement attacks since before October 7, 2023. However, with the onset of the genocide war in Gaza, Israeli settlers took control of the area and expelled Palestinian farmers from it, hindering the Jerusalem water authority from performing its duties.
In Ein Samiya, located in the lands of Kafr Malik (east of Ramallah), there are 6 water wells that have supplied the majority of towns in eastern Ramallah with drinking water since the 1960s.
Alongside the genocide war in the Gaza Strip, the Israeli army and settlers in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, have killed at least 1,047 Palestinians and injured about 10,300, in addition to arresting more than 19,000, including 400 children, according to official Palestinian data.
Official and international bodies have called for urgent intervention to stop these daily attacks.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 2:14 am - Jerusalem Time
Hamas discusses Trump's plan with Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey and commits to studying it responsibly.
An informed source said that officials from Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey held a meeting with a delegation from the Hamas negotiating team to discuss U.S. President Donald Trump's plan, while the movement confirmed that it would responsibly consider the plan, which the Qatari Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs stated achieves a main goal of ending the war in Gaza.
The source clarified that the Hamas delegation confirmed during the meeting that it would work on an official response as soon as possible after consultations with Palestinian factions concluded.
The same source indicated that the meeting of officials from Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey with the Hamas delegation is part of the technical discussions to formulate the final position on Trump's plan.
The U.S. President had given Hamas 3 to 4 days to respond to the plan, warning that their situation would be 'extremely difficult' if they rejected it, emphasizing that Arab and Islamic countries, as well as Israel, had agreed to the plan.
Meanwhile, Qatari Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani expressed hope that everyone would view the initiative constructively, noting that it achieves a main goal of ending the war.
He confirmed that the plan includes issues that need clarification and negotiation, pointing out that there are opportunities related to stopping the war, preventing displacement, and managing the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
The Qatari Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs noted that meetings regarding the plan are taking place with Hamas with the participation of Egypt and Turkey, confirming that the movement has acted responsibly and promised to study the plan.
He stated that basic demands from the Palestinian side are present in Trump's plan, but other aspects need detailing, such as the Israeli withdrawal and the Palestinian administration of the Gaza Strip.
The Axios website reported that U.S. officials are willing to discuss Hamas's specific requests for clarifications or amendments but will not open the entire plan for discussion.
The American site revealed that the plan announced by the U.S. President regarding Gaza underwent substantial modifications introduced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, leading to a significant change in the terms of the agreement that the United States and several Arab and Islamic countries had previously approved.
The new proposal links the Israeli withdrawal to the progress of the disarmament process of Hamas and grants Israel veto power over the process. Even if all conditions are met and the three phases of withdrawal are completed, Israeli forces will remain within a security perimeter inside Gaza 'until Gaza is fully secured against any renewed threat,' which could mean indefinitely.
Officials from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey have expressed their anger at these amendments.
In Israel, the newspaper 'Israel Hayom' quoted Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar as saying that any amendment to Trump's plan means rejecting it.
Channel 12 reported Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir stating that the proposed agreement is dangerous to Israel's security and is full of loopholes, failing to achieve the war objectives set by the government.
He added that everyone in Israel is eager for the return of prisoners, but the price is unbelievable, as he put it.
The Israeli Broadcasting Authority reported that Ben Gvir called on members of the 'Jewish Power' party bloc in the Knesset to meet to discuss Trump's proposal.
In a related context, the Israeli site 'Walla' quoted a security official stating that military operations in the Gaza Strip will witness an escalation in the coming days, confirming that there is no intention to reduce the pace of fighting at this stage.
The Israeli security official clarified that the duration and extent of the fighting will depend on the nature of the response that Hamas will provide to the proposed U.S. plan.
The security official pointed out that Israeli military plans are pre-approved, and if the response is negative, there is a decision to expand military operations.
The plan includes issues that need clarification and negotiation, and there are opportunities related to stopping the war.
PALESTINE
Wed 01 Oct 2025 12:54 am - Jerusalem Time
First comment from Tony Blair on Trump's plan regarding Gaza
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is a candidate to manage Gaza, described U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to end the war in the Gaza Strip as 'bold and clever', noting that it 'provides us with the best opportunity to end two years of war, misery, and suffering.'
In a statement published by the 'Tony Blair Institute for Global Change', Blair said that 'if the plan is approved, it could end the war, provide immediate relief to Gaza, and offer a better and brighter future for its people, while ensuring Israel's absolute and permanent security, and releasing all hostages.'
Blair, who led his country into the Iraq War while he was Prime Minister, added that 'Trump's willingness to chair the Peace Council to oversee the new Gaza is a significant sign of support and confidence' in Gaza's future.
Blair's discussion about Gaza comes as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's plan, which mentioned that Blair would be responsible within a three-member committee to manage the sector.
The Hebrew newspaper 'Haaretz' reported on former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's plan to manage the Gaza Strip after the cessation of the Israeli genocide, which includes the formation of three security forces, with a budget estimated at $387.5 million.
According to 'Haaretz', Blair's plan includes a multi-layered hierarchical structure, where senior international diplomats and businessmen are at the top, while Palestinians manage affairs on the ground.
According to the plan, titled 'The International Transitional Authority for the Gaza Strip (JETA)', which consists of 21 pages, the authority will be managed by an international council.
The Hebrew newspaper added: 'The head of the international authority will be the highest political executive authority in Gaza, but will work in close consultation with the Palestinian Authority.'
It quoted an unnamed source within the Israeli occupation government as saying: 'Blair is set to take on the position of head of the International Transitional Authority for the Gaza Strip.'
For his part, a member of the political bureau of the movement, Hossam Badran, stated that Blair is 'an unwelcome figure in the Palestinian case', and confirmed that the movement has not received any proposal through intermediaries regarding a ceasefire.
He considered that 'linking any plan to this unwelcome person (Blair) is a bad omen for the Palestinian people, as he is a negative figure, and perhaps deserves to be before international courts for the crimes he has committed, especially his role in the war on Iraq (2003-2011)', describing the Hamas leader's view of Blair as 'the brother of the devil', saying that he 'has not brought good to the Palestinian cause, nor to Arabs or Muslims, and his criminal and destructive role has been known for years.'
Blair: Trump's plan provides us with the best opportunity to end two years of war and misery.
PALESTINE
Tue 30 Sep 2025 11:24 pm - Jerusalem Time
Axios: Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey urge Hamas to accept Trump's plan to stop the war in Gaza.
The Hamas movement is facing intense diplomatic pressure from key mediators, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, to urge it to provide a positive response to the proposal put forward by U.S. President Donald Trump to end the conflict.
President Trump announced that he is giving Hamas a deadline of three to four days to respond to his proposal.
The proposed plan includes many of the demands made by Hamas, such as the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and an increase in humanitarian aid.
This is the best agreement that can be achieved, and there will be nothing better.
ARAB AND WORLD
Tue 30 Sep 2025 11:24 pm - Jerusalem Time
The Houthis threaten to target American oil companies.
The Ansar Allah group (Houthis) said today, Tuesday, that it will target major American oil companies such as ExxonMobil and Chevron.
The Humanitarian Operations Coordination Center, based in Sana'a, stated that it has listed 13 American companies, 9 individuals, and 2 ships on its sanctions list.
The center clarified in a statement that it included these entities, individuals, and assets on the sanctions list for facilitating the export, re-export, transfer, loading, purchasing, or selling of American crude oil from American ports.
The executive director of the Humanitarian Operations Coordination Center said, "The actions taken today... are considered a first step in response to the sanctions imposed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury on June 20, July 22, and September 11, 2025, by designating and listing entities, individuals, and ships on the sanctions list."
He pointed out that this contradicts what the "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sultanate of Oman announced on May 6 regarding de-escalation and a ceasefire between the United States and Yemen."
The truce agreed upon with the administration of President Donald Trump stipulated not to attack vessels associated with the United States sailing in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
The center acts as a link between the Houthi forces and commercial shipping companies.
The actions taken today are considered a first step in response to the American sanctions.
PALESTINE
Tue 30 Sep 2025 11:16 pm - Jerusalem Time
An American judge rules that the Trump administration violated the Constitution by targeting supporters of Palestine.
A U.S. federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated the Constitution by targeting foreign students and academics for their participation in protests and campaigns supporting Palestinians to condemn the Israeli war on Gaza.
Judge William Young, from the district court in Boston, stated that the Trump administration adopted an illegal policy that involved revoking the visas of foreign students and faculty members who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy, detaining them, and deporting them.
Young considered this a suppression of free speech and a violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. judge clarified that the ruling at this stage is limited to proving the illegality of the policy in question, noting that he will later determine the necessary measures to address the issue.
Lawyers for faculty groups urged the court to issue orders preventing the Trump administration from threatening to take such actions.
The Trump administration took strict measures against protests in the country regarding the Israeli genocide in Gaza, cutting funding to universities and seeking to deport some pro-Palestinian activists under the pretext of anti-Semitism.
The campaign against foreign students began with the arrest of Palestinian-origin student Mahmoud Khalil last March, and later expanded to include the detention and deportation of others, with judges ordering the release of detainees in most cases.
The U.S. administration exerted significant pressure, including threats to cut federal funding to several prominent universities, such as Columbia and Harvard, to push them to target students and teachers involved in activities supporting the Palestinian cause.
Judge Young considered this a suppression of free speech and a violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
PALESTINE
Tue 30 Sep 2025 11:14 pm - Jerusalem Time
How will Hamas determine its position on Trump's plan?
The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Palestinian resistance factions are facing a difficult situation, according to analysts, as they are required to respond quickly to the American plan presented by President Donald Trump to end the war in Gaza. However, this plan needs in-depth study - as they say - due to its ambiguous points.
Trump has given Hamas a maximum of 4 days to respond to his plan, otherwise Israel has the green light "to do what it needs to do," describing this plan as "clear and comprehensive, and it has gained wide Israeli and Arab acceptance."
According to journalist specializing in American affairs, Mohamed El-Menshawi, Hamas is in a tough position because Trump wants a clear answer to his plan: yes or no, due to his eagerness to achieve some accomplishment even at the expense of the Palestinians.
The negotiating delegation from Hamas promised, upon receiving Trump's plan, to study it responsibly, as confirmed by the spokesperson for the Qatari Foreign Ministry, Majid Al-Ansari. According to the ministry, a meeting is supposed to be held on Tuesday evening in Doha to discuss the details of the plan, with the participation of a delegation from Hamas and officials from Turkey and Egypt.
In the opinion of academic and Middle East policy expert Dr. Mahjoub Al-Zuwairi, Hamas is required to be vigilant in its position regarding the plan, not excluding the possibility of demanding further clarifications and guarantees, and focusing on the issue of the plan's marginalization of the Palestinians the day after the war ends, whether for the Palestinian National Authority or for Hamas.
Al-Zuwairi believes - in his remarks to the program "Beyond the News" - that what the American president presented to Arab and Muslim leaders when he met with them included general issues such as stopping the displacement of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, ending the war, and allowing aid into the sector, as well as the issue of recognizing the Palestinian state.
However, Al-Zuwairi sees that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's - wanted by the International Criminal Court - swift announcement of his approval of Trump's plan indicates that he "took everything and gave nothing."
According to El-Menshawi, what reinforces the position that says Israel got everything it wanted through the U.S. administration's plan is that members of the Senate and House from both the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States supported the plan and saw that it serves Israel.
Despite Netanyahu's approval, the American plan faced severe opposition within the Israeli government, as the far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich launched a sharp attack on it, describing it as "a return to Oslo and a resounding diplomatic failure."
According to academic and Israeli affairs expert Dr. Mahmoud Yizbak, the Israeli right's attack on the plan came because it did not meet its demands for annexing parts of the West Bank and establishing settlements in northern Gaza, demands for which the right sent a delegation to the White House. However, Netanyahu - Yizbak adds - has become a hero in the eyes of Israeli protesters who criticized him just two days ago.
It is noted that several Arab and Islamic countries welcomed the American initiative, emphasizing the necessity of delivering humanitarian aid to the besieged Gaza Strip, stopping displacement operations, and adhering to a political path leading to a two-state solution.
Trump's plan, which includes 21 points, stipulates the release of Israeli prisoners in Gaza within 72 hours and the disarmament of Hamas. It also states that Gaza will be temporarily managed by a Palestinian transitional technocratic committee, responsible for managing public services under the supervision of a transitional international body called the "Peace Council," chaired by Trump.
Hamas is required to respond quickly to Trump's plan, but the plan needs in-depth study.




