Plans to 'Abduct' the Palestinian People: How Israel Seeks to Impose a One-State Reality?

Israel adheres to a set of security pretexts for rejecting the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, based on its experience of withdrawing from the Gaza Strip and the subsequent repercussions leading up to the events of October 7th. Israeli circles believe that the elevated terrain of the West Bank poses a strategic threat to coastal areas, making the hypothetical Palestinian state militarily vulnerable and capable of targeting the Israeli heartland.

Political analyses confirm that these security arguments lack objectivity, as they can be addressed through international understandings and joint security coordination. However, the real reason lies in the Israeli political doctrine that refuses to relinquish land, which explains the absence of the flexibility that previous governments showed towards historical peace proposals.

Currently, demographic and social crises within Israel are being transferred to large-scale settlement projects in the heart of the West Bank. This settlement expansion, whether official or informal, aims to encircle the Palestinian presence and transform it into small, fragmented enclaves, easily controlled and separated from the outside world by simple security measures.

Israeli steps to effectively annex the West Bank are accelerating, a path that cannot be completed without widespread displacement of Palestinians. Annexation means placing Israel before the choice of a one-state solution, which, to ensure its continuation, requires achieving a decisive demographic superiority, so that Palestinians do not exceed one-third of the population in the new entity.

Israeli political literature proposes the idea of displacement as a solution to the demographic obstacle that previously hindered the one-state project. The options proposed for implementing this vary, from fabricating major crises as a pretext for widespread military operations, to opening paths for forced migration to distant areas or countries willing to receive quotas of displaced persons.

Should the one-state project be implemented, the remaining Palestinians will be subjected to 'social engineering' operations aimed at keeping them as a workforce serving only Israeli interests. This model resembles old colonial systems in Africa, where all details of daily life and education of the population are interfered with to ensure their complete submission to the new system.

These paths are linked to major regional transformations, especially concerning the conflict with Iran and Israel's strategic positioning in the region. The right-wing government led by Benjamin Netanyahu seeks to capitalize on any moral victory to strengthen its influence, which necessitates a counter-movement from the Arab-Islamic alliance to prevent Israeli regional dominance.

Assassinating the two-state solution represents continuous pressure on neighboring Arab countries, as it leads to fragile settlements and endless security and political attrition. The Israeli plan aims to strip Palestinians of their status as a people, transforming them into a mere demographic bloc without political rights, which threatens regional stability as a whole.

While Israel invests in a policy of fait accompli and unilateral actions, the absence of a corresponding Palestinian move to fortify the national presence on the ground is evident. The bet remains on the ability of regional and international alliances to curb Israeli ambitions that seek to impose a solution that serves only its interests without offering any real concessions.

Displacement is inherently linked to annexation, both practically and objectively, and Israeli options include fabricating major events to carry out massacres leading to the departure of Palestinians.