Israeli media: Entering Gaza with an occupation operation is the worst option.

Israeli analysts have warned of the dire consequences that could result from any military operation in the city of Gaza, noting that the cost will be high, both in terms of Israeli soldier casualties and the fate of the captives. These warnings come amid escalating tensions and mutual threats between the occupation and Hamas.

Amos Yadlin, the former head of military intelligence, emphasized the need for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to convince his people that he has an effective plan to bring back the captives while simultaneously defeating Hamas. This challenge requires him to persuade the mothers who send their sons to war that there is hope for success.

In a related context, the military affairs correspondent for Channel 13, Or Heller, pointed out that Gaza is full of surprises, as there are thousands of Palestinian resistance fighters preparing ambushes and using unexploded bombs to create explosive devices. These preparations indicate that the battle will be fierce.

Nir Dvori, the military affairs correspondent for Channel 12, added that any decision to approve an operation to occupy Gaza must be accompanied by full responsibility for the consequences. This warning reflects the growing concern about the repercussions of any military operation.

Yisrael Ze'ev, the former head of operations in the army, considers that entering Gaza with an occupation operation is the worst option, as fighting in a built-up area will lead to a large number of casualties and injuries, which will significantly affect the fate of the captives.

Ze'ev also noted that the occupation will not lead to a resolution, citing previous operations that did not achieve their objectives. This analysis reflects a lack of confidence in the occupation army's ability to achieve quick and effective victories.

At the same time, Netanyahu, who faces accusations of committing war crimes, approved the plan to occupy Gaza despite Hamas agreeing to the mediators' proposal for a ceasefire, complicating the situation further and reflecting a division in decision-making.