OPINIONS

Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:22 am - Jerusalem Time

An open occupation policy against administrative prisoners

The Occupation Prisons Authority believes that its threats to administrative prisoners in order to prevent them from going on hunger strike in protest of their administrative detention, and its violation of international laws and norms against the prisoner movement in general and administrative prisoners in particular, may discourage them from their struggle steps in order to achieve their just demands.


These threats cannot discourage the administrative prisoners from their legitimate decision to declare a comprehensive hunger strike, which they set to begin on the eighteenth of this month, after they have exhausted all struggle steps in order to abolish the outdated administrative detention that even the state put in place during its colonization of Palestine to facilitate The establishment of the occupying state canceled it, because it contradicts international laws and norms and violates human rights to freedom of expression and opinion, and other things.


Before announcing their struggle steps by announcing the date of the comprehensive hunger strike, they took several struggle steps, including refraining from attending the courts. Many of them also carried out and are still doing individual hunger strikes, which led to the death of the prisoner Khader Adnan a few weeks ago, but the occupation prison administrations rejected all their demands. Rather, the Minister of the so-called Israeli National Security instructed the occupation prisons authority to increase the restrictions on prisoners, including administrative prisoners, which prompted them to escalate their protest steps and their decision to use their last weapon, which is a comprehensive hunger strike, despite the risks to their health and lives.


In addition to threatening a number of administrative prisoners, the prison administrations tried to present temptations to a number of others, represented in not imposing penalties on them and not renewing their administrative detention, as is the case now, where the administrative detention of administrative prisoners is renewed several times, and many of them are for years that often reach up to Five or six years, and after their release, the occupation authorities arrest them again.
The prison authorities, with their attempts at this threat and temptation, believe that through this they can succeed in this policy and strike at the unity of the administrative prisoners, and thus thwart the comprehensive hunger strike.
However, it is unlikely that this policy, which relies on divide and rule, will succeed with the administrative prisoners who believe in the rights of their people and their rights as prisoners and fight for their freedom, especially since the occupation authorities do not present any indictments against them and that their arrest comes under allegations of secret files against them, in an attempt to sow dust in the dirt. El-Ayoun and in order to continue their arbitrary detention.
The methods of prison administrations have become exposed, and they cannot succeed in separating the unity of the captive movement in general, and the fate of these methods and policies is a complete failure.
Hence, it is the national and moral duty of all Palestinians to take the broadest steps of solidarity with administrative prisoners and prisoners in general, and to support them and their families to prevent prison administrations from single-handedly excluding them and taking more arbitrary measures against them.

Tags

Share your opinion

An open occupation policy against administrative prisoners

MORE FROM OPINIONS

The Coming Arab Backlash

Foreign Affairs

Settler terrorism: Palestinians are becoming prisoners in their own homeland

Middle East Eye

Hamas is paying and the people are paying the price for its wrong and suspicious alliances

Ibrahim Ibrash

Iran–Israel: An escalation in the form of a lying poker

ORIENT XXI- Special Translation for "Al- Quds" dot com

Analyzing Israeli fascism

YAANI.fr

What does the “war against Gaza” look like through the eyes of prominent Israelis?

Dr.. Asaad Abdel Rahman

The unspoken story of why Israel didn’t clobber Iran

The Washington Post

Rethinking Nato’s role in a changing world

Ramzy Baroud

Ibrahim Abrash responds to Musa Abu Marzouk..

Ibrahim Abrash

War on Gaza: A cruel month of massacres for Palestinians as the US mask is ripped off

Middle East Eye

War on Gaza: Why Israel's savagery is a sign of its impending defeat

Middle East Eye

How America Can Prevent War Between Iran and Israel

Foreign Affairs

Arab Countries Have Israel’s Back—for Their Own Sake

Foreign Policy

Iran and Israel’s Dangerous Gambit

Carnegie Endowment

Hawks' calls to strike Iran now are wrong

Mark Champion

Can Israel Harness Its Rare Moment of Regional Support?

Foreign Policy

The West now wants 'restraint'- after months of fuelling a genocide in Gaza

Middle East Eye

Israel-Palestine: The End Game

Gershon Baskin

Israel made mistakes on Gaza. It has more to lose on Iran

Haaretz

Israel decides to attack Iran and the Middle East is in a state of boiling

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com