US President Donald Trump revealed that his administration is seriously studying a large-scale military attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran, describing the anticipated operation as the largest of its kind compared to any previous confrontations. Trump stated in remarks reported by media sources that he is very close to making his final decision regarding resuming expanded combat operations.
The US President indicated that coordination with allies is ongoing, affirming that Israel is ready to join the attacks within just two minutes if Washington makes a formal request. However, Trump stressed that the United States possesses sufficient capabilities to act alone and does not need assistance from any party to carry out its new operations against Tehran.
In his reading of the political situation, Trump mentioned that the Iranian leadership desires to negotiate, but is still unwilling to conclude a real agreement at the present time. He believed that Tehran has not yet felt enough pressure or what he described as 'pain' to push it to change its aggressive behavior in the region and seriously engage in a diplomatic path.
Despite the high tone of threat, Trump acknowledged that a decision of this magnitude would have severe repercussions regionally and internationally. He explained that he fully understands the extent of the risks associated with direct confrontation, which explains why he has not made the final decision yet, despite being close to it.
For their part, informed sources quoted senior American officials as saying that the military has not yet received any new operational orders to begin a comprehensive attack. Officials indicated that the option of returning to an open war with Iran faces internal challenges, especially since it does not enjoy widespread popularity among the American public at present.
These political and military tensions have directly reflected on global markets, with oil prices recording a significant rise to reach the $100 per barrel mark. Investors are concerned about disruptions to energy supplies in the event of an armed conflict in the Gulf region and vital waterways.
In the context of diplomatic efforts, regional sources involved in mediation efforts reported that Tehran has not responded to recent offers made to de-escalate the situation. One mediator confirmed that the efforts made are hampered by the Iranian side's lack of cooperation, complicating the chances of reaching a settlement that prevents military explosion.
The United States had already begun intensifying its air and missile strikes against Iran-linked targets over the past twelve days. These military moves come in an attempt to deter ongoing Iranian attacks targeting commercial vessels passing through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
Reports indicate that Iranian policy has not seen any tangible change despite increasing military pressure, but rather has moved towards escalation on several regional fronts. US intelligence circles are closely monitoring field movements that indicate Tehran's insistence on continuing its current approach in the region.
In a new field development, the Houthis in Yemen began launching attacks targeting Saudi ships in the Red Sea, adding a new dimension to the crisis. These attacks have exacerbated instability in one of the world's most important oil passages, directly threatening global energy security.
Trump vowed via his 'Truth Social' platform to hold Iran fully responsible for any escalation by the Houthis in the Red Sea. He considered that the group operates as a direct proxy for Tehran, and therefore any targeting of ships will be met with a violent military response affecting both Iranian and Houthi interests.
Observers believe that Trump's statements aim to exert the maximum degree of psychological and political pressure on decision-makers in Tehran before taking any military step. The region remains in a state of high anticipation for what the coming days will bring, in the absence of any clear horizon for a stalled diplomatic solution.
The US administration faces pressure from its regional allies to ensure freedom of navigation and protect international trade routes from ongoing threats. Washington considers that the continuation of attacks on commercial vessels represents a red line that requires a firm response that may exceed the limits of currently implemented limited operations.
Finally, the question remains about the timing of the decision Trump hinted at, and the ability of regional mediations to defuse the crisis at the last minute. The rise of energy prices to record levels puts the global economy to a difficult test, given the possibilities of current skirmishes turning into a widespread regional conflict.
I am close to making a decision, and the attack on Iran will be bigger than ever if approved.
شارك برأيك
Trump threatens unprecedented military attack against Iran and holds it responsible for Houthi escalation