By Jean Aziz
"Well, we have dropped the Soviet Union with a double blockade, between Christian democracies in the west, and the Islamic awakening in the east. Now how do we drop political Islam?"
A question that became the subject of the first research in Washington between the late eighties and the early nineties. Until they found the solution - the disaster. Which still interacts crises and wars, even Gaza.
Washington conducted a quick study, as all its studies, to compare the Soviet pole and the Islamic Planet. So I concluded simply, it is a fixed approach in all its extracts, until the following: The first was placed in geography. This facilitated the siege. The second is widespread until the outbreak. Thus, the solution is not here by the siege. But by bombing from the inside until fragmentation and collapse.
While American thinking councils are on the search for the point - the killing of this required bombing, according to the scenario of the Hollywood Film Film "Harmagedon", Saddam Hussein and presented to them, on the morning of August 2, 1990, the answer, the solution and the required location. The man invaded Kuwait, in the day he folded his war with the Khomeini regime. So I loved the idea in Washington: We found it. Let us make Iraq a permanent war. It is the ideal reservoir of bombing the whole world of political Islam. In it all the intersections - the necessary and necessary contradictions to make any bullet, interact and explode according to the endless reactions chains:
After the occupation of Iraq, we became a radical new Middle East. Where the Shiite political Islam represented by the Mullahs of Tehran, it progresses in natural geography, political and economic, under the auspices of American directly
In Iraq, four intersections - contradictions, ideal for achieving the required goal:
First: the Shiite Sunni intersection, one of the most important bombing.
Second: The Iranian Arab intersection. With all its historical and betting stores.
Third: The intersection of political geography, between Mesopotamia, which is rooted in the land of the Arabian Peninsula from one of the two parties to the conflict, and between the only open geographical window of Faris, which was imprisoned by nature between the two mountain chain, and left it only towards the Shatt al -Arab. This exacerbates the required conflict.
Fourth, the intersection of oil and wealth that must lure the entire region to that raging Aoun ...
And so it became. It was even said that a clash was not a patent. Rather, he was satisfied with the innocence of Tikriti in violence and invasion. While April Glasby lured him to the endless maze.
In the first part of the helling scenario, Bush stopped at the Kuwaiti border. And soon the results of the explosion are waiting. But the matter remained limited. Then bin Laden came and volunteered for the same job on September 11. The day when the White House was a man who is professionally good at the game, his name is Dick Cheney. He holds the full decision, in light of a digestive image of the head of a doll, the son of the first round. Cheney immediately issued the matter: the attack on Iraq. He had to wait two years, while Mullah Omar's file is closed in Kabul. Then he went to Baghdad, an occupied, victorious, explosive to a country, a region, and a world.
New Middle East
After the occupation of Iraq, we became a radical new Middle East. Where the Shiite political Islam represented by the Mullahs of Tehran, it progresses in natural, political and economic geography, under direct American sponsorship. While Sunni political Islam is also targeted from Washington. On the background of being responsible for September 11, the desired and the new pretext of the new cosmic war.
Iran was more comfortable. Her crescent extended from the Gulf to the medium
Until the White House rest to its strategy for a future century. And he began to look at the doctrine of displacement in the east towards Asia. There is no problem after today in the Middle East. There are no central or fateful issues. Rather, it is just ancient tribes fighting and controlling the empire. While the new world now starts from the Pacific Ocean and its surroundings.
In one extraordinary moment for this trend, a dreamer from another world was completely strange to Washington. Barak, Ibn Hussein Obama, a student of Harvard, Al -Kab Al -Kelein for his rejection or even hatred of his roots and history.
Think for a while to change the plan. Or perhaps accelerate it. He said: Let us try the Turkish -Erdogan Muslim Brotherhood model, in its attractive duo, between a special Islamic democracy, and liberal economic on our way. If you succeed, we summarize the time and price. And if it fails, the Islamists only pay the prices and the loss of times. He released what was the "Arab Spring". He was said to have signed an executive order for his launch in August 2010. After months, Bouazizi's body was burned in Tunisia. Before a full generation is burned with freedom and modernity, and a chance is burned.
Even Obama was not satisfied with the establishment. Rather, helped prepare for implementation. So he was able to liquidate bin Laden in the first of May 2011, while the Brotherhood spring harvested the capitals from Tunisia to Cairo, the West.
However, Obama opened the crescents, and they soon closed in Damascus. In the capital of the Umayyads, the Brotherhood spring turns an endless massacre. Israel was mobilized and its existential warning bell was stolen in the scheduled Washington triangle, between the White and Foreign Affairs and Congress. He conveyed a clear message: Let Obama go and try his inventions on the "Islamic DNA" away from our borders. Here the chaos is forbidden. Be creative or destructive. Leave a ruler and arrange your world with other approaches.
Obama immediately adhere. He felt his chemical warning. His Russian and Iranian friend called for the protection of the northern borders of Israel, from the chaos of his spring, blood storms.
Iran was more comfortable. Her crescent extended from the Gulf to the medium.
While Washington, emotional, empty, underestimating until contempt.
Western misunderstanding
Originally, and between two halists, who were interrupted here, the West did not understand once the truth of political Islam and its structural depth. He did not fundamentally realize his founding violence. He continued to deal with it as if it was just a sociological phenomenon, one of the many phenomena of human social pluralism around the world. Like the Irish, Catalan, or Basque issue, or other ethnic conflicts, it can be managed indefinitely, with techniques "give them what they fear later lost", and the theories of Liv Koching.
He did not understand the West once, but rather refuses to understand, what does it mean that the mother of the followers of Khomeini political Islam wished for the death of all of her children in the battle. Contrary to a fixed Islamic rule that the boys are the adornment of this worldly life, not the afterlife.
The West did not hear, but rather refuses to hear, the vocabulary of a division that the shameful people repeat to those who fall into the battle of Khomeini political Islam:
"Section is a section, we will cover the face of the earth, until Islam triumphs."
He did not say: We will cover the earth with knowledge, good, love, growth, or prosperity, for example. Rather, only blood.
This is what the West did not understand in general and Washington in particular, and it will not be done. They will continue to try with the famous rule: experience and error!
Let us close the Hilalin here, and let us go back to where Obama left: the man came out of the presidency with an internal American boiling and bombs in the region.
As it is supposed to happen by the nature and reverse of the action, the internal American reaction came to the arrival of the first brown president, the election of an original original cobby, from Bani Trump. He took over the bombing of all the packages left by Obamic experiences.
He moved his country's embassy to Jerusalem. Qasim Soleimani and his Iraqi "engineer" were killed. He left Aramco bombing Iranian fire without response. He provoked a complete east and a western ally, which is steeped between a former exhibiting wife, and a permanent numbness ...
Until the world became similar to what he committed around Congress the moment he lost the elections.
Amid this madness, Saudi Arabia seemed to be looking for a different vision. Between the open Yemeni wound, and accumulated challenges at home, the neighborhood, the region and the world, Muhammad bin Salman went to try to draw a completely different path, for the history of the region at least 45 years ago.
He began to move the conflict with the Khomeini heirs regime, from the race on extremism, to a race towards modernity.
It was the first deep inconvenience to Tehran's mullahs. Then he went to agree with them. And by the patronage of? Beijing, that is, the largest importer of Iran's oil exports. Consequently, the first controller of its imports of very rare currency amid semi -famine.
Until the third step from Bin Salman, towards Palestine in particular. The focus of the conflict and its right address, and its permanent excuse for many. The negotiation began calmly and depth, about a major settlement: normalization with Israel, in exchange for a two -state solution. Any updated application of the Arab Peace Initiative announced from Beirut in 2002.
The step seemed to have serious chances of progress and explore the possibilities of success.
Tehran understood that it was the knockout of its influence project in the region, and the legitimacy of its eternal revolution in it. The planning for the October 7.
With one blow, it restores the conflict to its religious, where there is no solution or settlement. The banner of Palestine is kidnapped again, not the moment the Arabs abandoned it, but rather before they were able to achieve a fair solution to its cause. Iran's sensors in the entire region give new legitimacy to the struggle, after in recent years the authoritarian burdens on its societies, countries and peoples ...
Where from here on the eve of the beginning of the year 2024?
Either to endless wars, by mediation, tools and alternatives, and always with Palestinian and Arab blood. Netanyahu's logic triumphs in the entity, and Tehran's influence in the region. Either to the fall of Netanyahu and the victory of Palestine. But the Palestinian Arab and humanitarian Palestinian Palestine.
What determines the decisiveness between the two possibilities?
Gaza's steadfastness first. And the rationalization of Hamas second. And the recognition of Ramallah's authority of the necessity of change and switching third. The handing over of the two, power and movement together, that Palestine is the goal and the issue. Neither power nor the lines of its people. International public opinion pressed everyone fourth. Washington and Tel Aviv finally, the fact that Palestine is an issue that does not die.
In a return to the beginning of the research from the article of the first part yesterday, after the events of September 11, Anoun, Farid Zakaria, the famous Amouda: "The End of the History". In response to Fukuyama's saying. In a predestination that the fall of Manhattan Towers will lead to the fall of the polar monounsaturation of America.
After the October 7 attack, he will be written, either about the beginning of the right date, with the victory of Palestine.
Either about a return to prehistoric, with the victory of the dug of violence, brutality and killing, against Palestine, or its pretext!
