ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 12:42 pm - Jerusalem Time

Israel pledged to Egypt to evacuate the displaced from Rafah in exchange for “a certain influence” in Philadelphia.. See the full details of the agreement

Israel and Egypt are close to reaching a security agreement, stipulating the evacuation of the displaced from Rafah, numbering about a million Palestinians, and their transfer to another area in the Gaza Strip, in exchange for “a certain influence” for Israel in the Philadelphia axis, according to what Israeli Army Radio reported today, Thursday, citing Israeli security officials. .


This comes after talks between Egyptian and Israeli security officials in recent weeks. Israel considers an agreement on the Philadelphia Axis, separating the Gaza Strip and Egypt, to be a “sensitive issue” and a “very important step.” According to the radio, Israel is not interested in working without “important coordination” with the Egyptian side.


The radio added that Israel pledged to Egypt that it “will not operate (militarily) in the Rafah area, before it allows the (displaced) residents there to leave this area, in order to reduce the risks of waves of Palestinian refugees exodus from Gaza to Egyptian territory, which is the central fear in Egypt."


Israel has not yet decided on the area to which the displaced people in the Rafah area will be transferred. The radio reported that there are two possibilities: the return of the displaced to the northern Gaza Strip, in which case the Israeli political level should approve this, or their transfer to the Khan Yunis area “after the Israeli army ends its operations there.”


Regarding the Philadelphia Axis, the radio said that Israel will have a “certain influence” on what is happening along the axis, without the presence of Israeli forces, but rather this may be through technological means installed along the axis.

The radio added that an Arab country in the Gulf will finance the construction of an underground wall in this region against tunnels extending from the Gaza Strip to Egypt. This Gulf country, whose name cannot be mentioned, expressed its approval to finance the construction of this wall, provided that there is Egyptian approval for all these matters, namely the evacuation of the displaced, certain Israeli control over the Philadelphia axis, and the construction of the underground wall.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 12:01 pm - Jerusalem Time

China renews its call for holding an international peace conference to resolve the Palestinian issue

China stands ready to work with all parties to convene a broad-based, credible and effective international peace conference as soon as possible, formulate a concrete timetable and roadmap for implementing the two-state solution and support Palestine and Israel in resuming peace talks soon, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said (Wednesday). .


Spokesman Wang Wenbin made the remarks in response to a related inquiry during a daily press conference.


He said that China has called for an international peace conference on the Palestinian issue on many occasions. After the outbreak of the recent Palestinian-Israeli conflict, China submitted to the UN Security Council the position paper of the People's Republic of China on resolving the conflict, and again called for the early convening of an international peace conference.


Wang explained that during his meeting with Abbas, President Xi stressed "the importance of maintaining the right direction of the peace talks, and called for holding an international peace conference."


The spokesman said that China's proposal is increasingly appreciated in the international community.


He added that China is ready to work with all parties to convene a broad, reliable and effective international peace conference as soon as possible, formulate a concrete timetable and roadmap for implementing the two-state solution and support Palestine and Israel in resuming peace talks soon for the ultimate peaceful and harmonious coexistence between Palestine and Israel and among the Arabs and the Jews.

PALESTINE

Thu 01 Feb 2024 9:24 am - Jerusalem Time

Palestinian Red Crescent: Israeli army stormed Al-Amal Hospital in Gaza

The Palestinian Red Crescent said, “At dawn on Thursday, Israeli occupation vehicles stormed the courtyards of Al-Amal Hospital for the third time, took up positions there, and opened heavy fire in the vicinity of the hospital and on its buildings, before withdrawing later.”


It explained that the hospital dealt with 12 dead yesterday, including an employee and a volunteer in the association, in addition to 6 injuries.


It pointed out that Israeli forces opened fire on the hospital and its buildings, leading to bullets penetrating five vehicles, including three ambulances.


The Israeli forces continue to target and besiege Al-Amal Hospital, affiliated with the Red Crescent Society, for the eleventh day in a row, shooting bullets at anyone who moves in its vicinity.


According to the Red Crescent, Israel has tightened its siege on Nasser Medical Complex for the second week, placing 100 medical staff and 7,000 displaced people, the majority of whom are children and women, in constant terror and anxiety.


Since last Monday, the Israeli army has launched a series of intense air and artillery raids on Khan Yunis, and in the vicinity of the hospitals located there, amid ground advances by its vehicles in the southern and western areas of the city, which prompted thousands of Palestinians to flee.


It is noteworthy that 14 hospitals out of 36 in Gaza are partially operating, including nine hospitals in the south and six in the north.


The Israeli occupation forces have continued their aggression against the Gaza Strip, by land, sea and air, since the seventh of last October, resulting in the death of more than 26,900, in addition to about 66,000 wounded, and thousands of missing people.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 9:23 am - Jerusalem Time

Qatar's Foreign Minister responds to Netanyahu: Qatar supports the Palestinian people, not a political faction

Qatari Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman Al Thani stressed that his country supports the Palestinian people and not any political faction, rejecting what he described as Israeli “lies” about allegations of Doha’s funding of Hamas.


Bin Abdul Rahman said in an interview with the American National Public Radio (NPR): “Qatar supports peace and supports the Palestinian people living in dignity. We do not support Hamas or any political faction there.”


He explained that “55 percent of Qatar’s support for the Palestinians went to the West Bank, and 45 percent went to the Gaza Strip,” and that “the support went directly to the people, and not to any political faction there.”


Earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attacked Qatar, and said: “I think we must demand that Qatar, which hosts and funds Hamas and its leaders, release the rest of our hostages.” “I think the whole world is following the Qatari role.”


In other statements, Netanyahu accused Qatar of being a “problematic” country.


When Bin Abdul Rahman was asked about his response to these statements, he said: “I will not bother responding to irresponsible statements.”


He added: “The allegation of our funding of Hamas is categorically rejected, and this is clearly evident from the way we support the people of Gaza. All of this happens under the supervision of his government and the supervision of the governments of other countries,” and he stressed that this is taking place within the framework of a “transparent and legitimate process.”


He continued: “I confirm that all those who know and follow this process know that the Israeli claims are nothing but lies and are trying to mislead public opinion.”

PALESTINE

Thu 01 Feb 2024 9:18 am - Jerusalem Time

War on Gaza On the 118th day... dozens of killed and wounded in Israeli bombing

Dozens of citizens were killed, and others were injured, in the ongoing occupation aggression against the Gaza Strip, which enters its 118th day.


A number of Palestinians were killed and dozens were injured in the Israeli missile and artillery shelling and gunfire in the western region of Gaza City, specifically in the Al-Rimal neighborhood and Tal Al-Hawa, without ambulances being able to reach them, to transport them to Al-Shifa Hospital.


A number of citizens were killed, and dozens were injured, when Israeli aircraft bombed two houses in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, southeast of Gaza City.


Two citizens were killed and others were injured when Israeli aircraft bombed a house for the Abu Fayyad family in the new camp, west of Nuseirat, in the middle of the Gaza Strip.


There was also at least one killed and a number of injuries as a result of the occupation aircraft bombing a house for the Al-Buhaisi family in the city of Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.


Israeli artillery shelling continues on the Al-Amal neighborhood and the vicinity of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society, west of the city of Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, for the eleventh day in a row.


14 Palestinian bodies arrived at Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis, after they were recovered this morning, from various parts.


TheIsraeli warships also fired machine guns on the shores of the Gaza Sea, Al-Wusta, and Rafah.


The Israeli aircraft targeted empty land on the Palestinian-Egyptian border, south of the city of Rafah, south of the Gaza Strip.


In an infinite toll, the number of killed as a result of the ongoing Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip since October 7 has risen to more than 26,900 citizens, in addition to about 66,000 wounded, and thousands of missing people.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 9:04 am - Jerusalem Time

American movements to discuss the aftermath of the war on Gaza

A statement by the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Army stated that the Commander of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Charles Brown, discussed in a video call with his Israeli counterpart, Herzi Halevy, the ongoing operations in the Gaza Strip, while US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken visits the region at the end of the week to conduct diplomatic contacts regarding the post-war period in Gaza. .

Brown stressed the need to protect civilians and not restrict relief aid. He also stressed the importance of Israel's planning for post-war conditions, according to the statement.


Brown had said in previous statements that Israel's declared goals in its war on the Gaza Strip were "very large," indicating the impossibility of achieving them, stressing that the longer the war lasted, the more difficult it became.


In the same context, officials at the White House and the US State Department said in press statements yesterday, Wednesday, that Blinken will visit the region over the weekend.


The officials stated that Blinken will hold various contacts with the parties within the scope of the assessments, regarding the situation in the region after the end of the war on Gaza, how to manage the Strip at this stage, deliver humanitarian aid to the Palestinians, and recognize a possible independent Palestinian state.


This comes at a time when there is talk of concluding a prisoner exchange deal between the Israeli government and the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas). Israeli Channel 12 reported that Mossad chief David Barnea revealed to the Israeli War Council a “document of principles” for the deal, which includes in the first stage the release of... 35 Israeli detainees in the Gaza Strip, including women, the wounded, and the elderly, in exchange for a truce for 35 days.


It added, "It is possible after that to extend the calm for an additional week, in order to conduct negotiations on the possibility of completing the second phase of the deal, which includes the release of the youth, and all those whom Hamas describes as soldiers."


But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu set red lines for any prospective deal.


Netanyahu said - in a video clip he published yesterday, Wednesday - that it will not be done at any cost, and that he has red lines, including: not stopping the war, not withdrawing army forces from the Gaza Strip, and not releasing thousands of Palestinian prisoners.


Source: Al Jazeera + agencies

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 8:58 am - Jerusalem Time

Proposed by Lapid: Will a “safety net” pave the way for the overthrow of Netanyahu’s government?

The announcement of the head of the Israeli opposition, Yair Lapid, granting the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “safety net” for any exchange deal that might lead to the return of those kidnapped by the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the Gaza Strip, carries with it many meanings and implications regarding the future. The emergency government, the course of the fighting, and the day after the war.


Analyzes suggested that the current government coalition, which relies on far-right parties, is not able to complete any prisoner exchange deal in light of the position of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir to topple the government if a “bad deal” for prisoner exchange and ceasefire is reached.


Estimates unanimously indicate that Netanyahu has become a hostage to the extortions of the extreme right represented by the “Jewish Greatness” party headed by Ben Gvir, the “Religious Zionism” coalition headed by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, and the settler movement in the Likud Party.


Crack and harmony

The "safety net" offer reinforced estimates that the current government coalition, which insists on continuing the war on Gaza, will not last long if any deal is completed.


Analysts' readings agree that Lapid's announcement came to return all the kidnapped Israelis and does not constitute a lifeline to save the Netanyahu government, which will disintegrate or will witness changes and new alliances that precede the scenario of early elections for the Knesset.


Political analyst, Akiva Eldar, believes that the opposition leader’s proposal to grant a “safety net” for any exchange deal reflects the state of consensus forming in Israel calling for the return of the kidnapped, and it is in harmony with the rising voices calling for their liberation, in order to deny the opportunity to the extreme right-wing rejectionist parties. For any deal and threatens to overthrow the government.


Eldar explained to Al Jazeera Net that Lapid strongly opposes Netanyahu remaining in the prime minister's chair, and holds him responsible for the failure and failure to prevent the events of last October 7 and to return the kidnapped people as part of military operations.


The political analyst believes that Lapid is well aware that the kidnappers file is an important bargaining chip on the Israeli street in the upcoming elections, so he wants to be a partner in any deal and use it in his election campaign.


He explained that all opposition parties, including the “There is a Future” party headed by Lapid, are convinced that any comprehensive exchange deal, regardless of the concessions and the price that the government will pay, will be the beginning of the rift of the current coalition, deepen the rift in Israeli society, strengthen the state of internal polarization, and will establish a new phase in the Israeli political scene.


Eldar does not rule out that the “safety net” offer was put forward at the behest of parties in the US administration, even if no indications have emerged about that. He confirms that Lapid’s proposal and his positions on the exchange and war deal are consistent with the administration of US President Joe Biden, who hinted that Netanyahu must make changes in his coalition government.


Accept and reject

In turn, the military affairs analyst in the newspaper "Haaretz", Amos Harel, believes that Netanyahu is approaching the point where he will have to decide whether to go ahead with the deal or reject it, and therefore Lapid's proposal came to provide a "safety net" for any deal.


He explained that any potential exchange deal would come with significant concessions by the Netanyahu government and would be viewed by large segments of the Israeli public as a victory for Hamas, and that its rejection by Netanyahu would mean the continuation of the war as his coalition partners, Ben Gvir and Smotrich, demanded.


It is now clear that the extreme right in the government, Harel says, "will create difficulties and obstacles to any deal, as Ben Gvir was quick to publicly declare against a deal that included concessions and threatened to dissolve the government, and Smotrich is not far from him in his position on the deal and the war."


The same military analyst said that the extreme right is concerned that a long ceasefire might mean the end of the war and thus keep Hamas in power, at least in the southern Gaza Strip. Netanyahu is also aware that the partial return of the kidnapped people, in exchange for thousands of Palestinian prisoners, will be interpreted by large sectors of the Palestinian Authority. The Israeli public saw it as an admission of failure.


Antoine Shalhat, a researcher on Israeli affairs, believes that opposition leader Yair Lapid is supportive and supportive of the war, but he differs from Netanyahu with regard to the arrangement of goals. One of his priorities is the return of all those kidnapped by Hamas, even in exchange for Tel Aviv offering many concessions.


Shalhat told Al Jazeera Net that Lapid, who is consistent with the US administration's positions on the exchange deal and the method of fighting and war, strongly opposes Netanyahu remaining in power, and holds him responsible for the failure on October 7th and in achieving the goals of the war.


Collapse and disintegration

The same researcher explained that Lapid - like many Israelis - has become fully convinced that continuing the war and liberating the kidnapped are incompatible goals, and therefore his proposal to grant a “safety net” for an exchange deal came in response to the position of the extreme right that rejects the deal and threatens to dismantle the government.


Regarding the realism of this network, Shalhat says that its offer does not protect the government from collapse and disintegration, and is limited only to supporting the exchange deal and voting on it in the Knesset so that it can be implemented in light of the threat of Ben Gvir and the extreme right to dismantle the government if any deal is completed.


The researcher added that the background to Ben Gvir’s threats is also explained by the behavior of Netanyahu, who has become more hostage to the extreme right, as he opposes the withdrawal from Gaza and the liberation of thousands of Palestinian prisoners, delays the exchange deal, and repeats the goal of overthrowing Hamas’ rule, which reflects the conditions of this right to remain in government and continue the war until achieving its objectives.


Against the backdrop of the state of dependency that Netanyahu is living in, Shalhat says, “The positions of Israeli politicians, including Lapid, are in harmony with America’s positions, in opposition to the trend led by Netanyahu, which puts his personal interests above Israel’s higher interest and American interests in the Middle East.”


The researcher believes that Netanyahu is challenging the American position at this stage, but he has not yet reached the stage of breaking the tools of playing with Washington, which has many pressure cards to exercise if Netanyahu breaks these tools.


Source: Al Jazeera

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 8:56 am - Jerusalem Time

An Algerian draft resolution in the Security Council for a ceasefire in Gaza

Al Jazeera's correspondent reported that Algeria distributed to the UN Security Council a draft resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza for humanitarian reasons.


The draft resolution stipulates the rejection of the forced displacement of Palestinian civilians, demands an end to all violations, and renews the call for full, rapid, safe and unhindered access of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip.


Yesterday, Wednesday, the Security Council held an emergency meeting called for by Algeria regarding making mandatory the decision of the International Court of Justice in the genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel.


Algeria's permanent representative to the Security Council, Ammar Benjameh, said that the International Court of Justice's decision regarding Gaza "confirms that the time of impunity has ended irreversibly," according to what Algerian official television reported.


In his speech during the emergency meeting, Bin Jama called for “ensuring accountability and accountability so that we protect future generations from such atrocities committed in Gaza,” and added, “The United Nations and the international community have pledged themselves that no criminal will escape punishment, and the Israeli occupier must not be an exception to this rule.” ".


Enforceable measures

The representative of Algeria considered that “the precautionary measures called for by the International Court of Justice must be implemented to protect the Palestinian people from the genocide to which they are exposed, and Israel, the occupying power, must respond immediately to the measures approved by the Court, and it is the duty of the international community to ensure its commitment to these measures.” "The bloodbath and genocide to which the Palestinians are being subjected must be stopped."


He pointed out that the precautionary measures approved by the court "can only be implemented through a ceasefire, and this senseless aggression must be stopped now, and the ceasefire must be stopped immediately."


On January 26, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take measures to prevent genocide against the Palestinians and improve the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, but the decision did not include a “ceasefire” text.


Since October 7, the Israeli army has been waging a devastating war on the Gaza Strip, leaving more than 26,000 martyrs and about 66,000 injured, most of them children and women, and causing massive destruction and an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe.


Source: Al Jazeera + agencies

OPINIONS

Thu 01 Feb 2024 7:21 am - Jerusalem Time

Defunding UNRWA is worse than collective punishment

Aljazeera

Aljazeera

Opinion Writer

By Moncef Khane

Cutting funding for UNRWA at this time means furthering the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

On January 26, the very day the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an interim ruling on South Africa’s case accusing Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinian people, the Israeli government dropped a bomb. It was not the usual 900kg US-made bunker buster, but a much more lethal one: it accused 12 employees of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) of having ties to Hamas or being involved in its October 7 operation. This immediately resulted in over a dozen countries cutting their financial support for the agency and UNRWA’s chief, Philippe Lazzarini, firing nine of the accused (of other three – one is dead and two are unaccounted for).

Given the meagre aid trickling into Gaza and the looming starvation of its people, particularly in northern Gaza, defunding UNRWA now is worse than collective punishment –  it could be a death sentence for many destitute and hungry Palestinians.

UNRWA was established by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1949 to provide relief to all Palestine refugees originally defined as “persons whose place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948, and who lost both home and means of livelihood as the result of the 1948 war”. The definition was broadened to include persons displaced by the “1967 and subsequent hostilities”.

Today, UNRWA has 30,000 staff, mainly Palestinian physicians, nurses, educators, relief workers, drivers, engineers, logisticians, etc who provide humanitarian relief, healthcare, education and other assistance to millions of Palestine refugees throughout the Middle East. In Gaza, UNRWA’s 13,000 staff have supported almost all aspects of Palestinian life, especially after Israel imposed a blockade of the Gaza Strip in 2007 with Egypt’s support.

Critics have pointed out that the UN has delegated to UNRWA important international legal obligations that would otherwise be incumbent on Israel as the occupying power. Under the Geneva Conventions, basic services such as shelter, healthcare and education in occupied territories are the responsibility of the occupying state. Thus, in effect, the UN has subsidised, and possibly prolonged, Israel’s occupation of Palestinians.

From Israel’s perspective, UNRWA is another enemy that has prolonged Palestinian resistance to its occupation. It is a “barrier” to solving the Palestinian refugee question by simply resettling Palestinian refugees in other countries, as it is now openly advocates. For all Israeli governments, implementing UN Security Council resolutions and international law on the inalienable “right of return” of Palestinians forced by Zionist militias and subsequently the Israeli army to leave their homes in 1948 is anathema to Israel’s existence.

The accusations against the 12 UNRWA staff should be seen in this context; it is also important to remember who is making them. Israel is an occupying power facing allegations of genocide deemed plausible by the ICJ. Israeli forces have repeatedly attacked UN-protected facilities including schools and hospitals, killing thousands of civilians, mainly children and women seeking refuge on UNRWA premises, as well as 152 UNRWA staff. Israel also has a long history of unsubstantiated accusations against UNRWA employees and within the context of the current conflict, it has been caught lying repeatedly about alleged crimes by Palestinians (eg, the beheading of 40 babies on October 7).

Bolstered by the UN’s hasty decisions taken without establishing through an investigation a prima facie case, Israel now claims that 10 percent of Gaza-based staff have links to “militant groups”.

Under the UN’s internal rules, due process is compulsory when misconduct is alleged. When serious allegations backed by incontrovertible evidence against UN personnel are put forward, the UN’s secretary-general has the authority to order the summary dismissal of the accused staff. Such extreme cases are rare.

In all other cases, typically, a board of inquiry is established to investigate the most serious cases, or accusations are picked up by the UN’s internal investigatory department that may initiate a formal inquest based on preliminary evidence. In the interim, the staff member facing allegations of misconduct may be suspended.

In the case of the 12 UNRWA employees accused by Israel, summary dismissal is a surprising decision not least as the circumstances of the cases – an all-out war and possibly a genocide –  and the credibility of the accusing party should compel a cautionary approach.

Yet the UN leadership was quick to jettison the presumption of innocence of their staff. On January 28, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres issued a statement to advise that of the “12 people implicated, nine were immediately identified and terminated by the Commissioner-General of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini; one is confirmed dead, and the identity of the two others is being clarified. Any UN employee involved in acts of terror will be held accountable”. In his statement, Guterres further states that “the abhorrent alleged acts of these staff members must have consequences”.

Already, the secretary-general has seemingly adjudicated the case and promised “consequences”. He has shown no such outrage or made calls for accountability for the murder by the Israeli military of his own staff – as if such war crimes are not abhorrent acts that call for consequences.

Firing staff at will based solely, as Guterres admits, on “allegations” is troubling and should be of concern to all staff members and staff unions of the United Nations.

But more alarming and consequential is the swift decision of the United States, Austria, Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Iceland, Sweden, Switzerland, Romania and the United Kingdom to suspend their funding to UNRWA during an all-out war on the people it was established to protect.

Worse, when Israel is in the dock of the ICJ facing plausible allegations of perpetrating a genocide, such decisions may even be deemed a breach by these states of their obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. But this shouldn’t come as a surprise since some of the same governments choose to overlook the many war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by Israel and continue their military support for its onslaught on Gaza, now in its fourth month.

In the end, even if the 12 accused staff are found guilty of grave crimes, this hardly justifies starving UNRWA of funding when it tries to save from starvation Palestinians in Gaza. Cutting down a septuagenarian olive tree because it might have 12 “bad” olives on it is not only collective punishment – it is furthering a genocide.

OPINIONS

Thu 01 Feb 2024 7:16 am - Jerusalem Time

Netanyahu’s Cynical Political Game

Serge Schmemann

Serge Schmemann

Opinion Writer

The devastation of Gaza is at intolerable levels and getting worse; the Israeli government is under intense pressure from the families of hostages to do far more to free them before they perish; the United States and Arab states, anxious to avoid a regional war, are trying to mediate an end to the conflict. But Mr. Netanyahu blocks the way.

As a majority of Israelis and their allies can see, Mr. Netanyahu and his insistence on “total victory” over Hamas, with no consideration of the consequences or costs, have become a part of the problem. He is playing a cynical game, using the war to serve his political ends, and Israelis, most of whom support the effort to wipe out Hamas, are getting tired of it.

He has even managed to alienate Israel’s most important ally. Despite President Biden’s display of total support for Israel — and Mr. Netanyahu — after the atrocious attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, including the president’s personal visit to the Jewish state, Mr. Netanyahu has deliberately and publicly defied American advice as contrary to Israel’s “vital interests.” A particularly contentious conversation in late December ended with Mr. Biden angrily declaring, “This conversation is over.” It was a month before Mr. Biden phoned again.

The problem is not necessarily Mr. Netanyahu’s hawkish stance, which is shared by many Israelis enraged by the barbaric Hamas raid. It is Mr. Netanyahu’s confusion of leadership with political survival, with the widespread perception that he opposes any negotiated settlement and any American advice or mediation not because he really believes they run counter to Israelis’ interests, as he claims, but because appearing to stand up to “American pressure” and portraying the Gaza war as a far broader conflict about a Palestinian state and Iran serve his political ends.

That, at least, appears to be what a majority of Israelis believe, even those who might otherwise align with the prime minister’s insistence on trying to fully eradicate Hamas. According to a political poll taken in late December, only 15 percent of Israelis wanted him to stay in office after the war ended.

Beyond Israel’s borders, the scale of casualties and destruction in Gaza is increasingly drawing horror. According to the health ministry in Gaza, more than 26,000 people have been killed, and vast tracts of the narrow strip of land have been leveled. On Friday, the International Court of Justice in The Hague, part of the United Nations, said that Israel must take action to prevent acts of genocide by its forces in Gaza, as well as to allow more aid into the enclave. The ruling, an initial step in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide, stopped short of calling on Israel to immediately suspend its military campaign, but it contributed to the pressure on Israel to find ways of disengaging.

How the war ends, however, and what happens after Gaza, as Israeli commentators phrase it, strongly depend on who is in charge. Key members of the war cabinet formed to manage the fighting, Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot, both former military chiefs of staff, are known to differ strongly with Mr. Netanyahu, especially on the painful question of the Israeli hostages held by Hamas, believed to be 129 women and men.

Israel has historically gone to great lengths to get back captives and even the remains of those who perish, so the fate of the hostages is central in the internal Israeli debate on the war. Their families have campaigned passionately to have the release of the hostages a priority in any deliberations on the conduct of the war, fearing, as Mr. Eisenkot said in an interview, that “it is impossible to return the hostages alive in the near future without an agreement.” Mr. Netanyahu and his right-wing backers have insisted that only relentless military pressure on Hamas can lead to their freedom.

The hostages are also central to efforts by three key players — the United States, Israel’s main supporter; Egypt, an Arab country bordering Israel and Gaza; and Qatar, a major donor to Gaza — to mediate. Their goal is a phased process that, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal on Jan. 21, would start with a release of the captives and lead to a permanent cease-fire.

It’s a long shot, in part because the Hamas leadership is split between the combat wing inside Gaza and leaders outside. But the Biden administration believes that without any diplomatic process, an even more dangerous war could break out with Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border and that the Houthi attacks on shipping in the Red Sea could escalate into broader regional strife involving Iran. In the administration’s view, moreover, the task of reconstructing and governing Gaza in ways that would satisfy Israel’s security is more feasible today than ever before because Arab and Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, have shown a new readiness to normalize relations with Israel.

But, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken noted in Davos, the Arab states and the United States would insist “that this has to include a pathway to a Palestinian state.”

That is where Mr. Netanyahu stands solidly in the way. He has offered no true after-Gaza plan of his own but instead has positioned himself as the one man blocking a Palestinian state in the West Bank or Gaza and as the one Israeli leader prepared to stand up to Mr. Biden’s efforts to end the war. He has said that once the Gaza war is over, he would work on “full Israeli security control of all territory west of the Jordan River,” implying a full return to complete military occupation.

There are certainly questions to debate here, and Israel’s insistence on eliminating the threat from Hamas is fully justified. But the hard and often unpopular choices that Israel must make to wring a lasting victory from this war require a real leader. As the Times editorial board has argued, “Mr. Netanyahu cannot lead Israel in the search for peace.” His government “has steadfastly worked against a settlement with the Palestinians.”

Mr. Netanyahu has lost the confidence of his people and his allies. A political wizard who has been in the prime minister’s office for a total of 16 years since 1996, he has spent the last few years under indictment for corruption and in desperate efforts to stay in office. The last gambit was to bring far-right nationalists into his cabinet and to initiate a challenge to judicial oversight over the government, prompting weeks of massive protests.

 Source: Alsharq Alawsat

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 7:09 am - Jerusalem Time

Israeli newspaper: The Israeli army deliberately burned hundreds of homes inside the Gaza Strip in retaliation...

On Wednesday, January 31, 2024, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the Israeli occupation army deliberately burned hundreds of homes inside the Gaza Strip with all their property, and quoted officers from the occupation army as confirming that burning homes had become a “common means of destruction.” .


The Israeli newspaper, quoting three officers participating in the leadership of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, confirmed: “The burning operations were carried out on the orders of field officers and without obtaining the necessary judicial approvals.”


It also added that "some of the burning operations were in retaliation by the soldiers for the killing of their colleagues in the same unit."


According to the Haaretz report, three officers leading the ground attack on the Gaza Strip confirmed that setting fire to homes had become one of the paths of operations on the ground, and in some cases soldiers burned homes in which they were residing during their operations on the ground. In one case, an army battalion was about to end its “activity” in a combat center in the Gaza Strip, when one of the battalion commanders issued orders to the soldiers: “Take your belongings out of the house, and prepare it for fire.”


The report indicated that soldiers who participated in the aggression against the Gaza Strip recently published accounts of burning homes, some of which were for the purpose of avenging the killing of fellow soldiers, and sometimes out of revenge for the Al-Aqsa flood operation on October 7th.


It explained that in one case, before leaving a house, soldiers left a message for their colleagues who would come after them, in which they said: “We did not burn the house so that you could enjoy it. When you leave, you will know what to do.”


The Haaretz report confirmed that these burning operations target the homes of civilians who have no connection to the resistance factions or to the Al-Aqsa Flood operation, and these burning operations are not part of the destruction operations that the army does not hide that it has been carrying out since an early stage of the war, claiming that they belong to Hamas activists and people who participated in the storming of Settlements around the Gaza Strip on October 7, or by claiming that these homes are Hamas infrastructure, or that there is Hamas infrastructure near them.


International law prohibits setting fire to the homes of civilians not participating in the fighting for punitive purposes only.


Haaretz said that the United States recently asked Israel to stop demolishing public buildings in the Gaza Strip, such as schools and clinics, because that would harm Gazans seeking to return to their homes after the war, claiming that Israel accepted the American request, and the scope of destruction of abandoned homes was reduced. Not only because of the American request, but also because the forces operating in the Gaza Strip realized that these destruction operations require time and resources, and expose the soldiers participating in these activities to danger.


Among the most prominent public buildings that were burned or destroyed by the occupation army were: the University of Palestine, the Khalifa School affiliated with the UNRWA Relief Agency (UNRWA), Al-Azhar University, and entire residential squares in the north, center and south of the Gaza Strip. The Israeli occupation army also destroyed more than 200 archaeological and heritage sites of 325 registered sites in the Gaza Strip.


The occupation army received a painful blow during one of the destruction operations, in the Maghazi camp, where the Al-Qassam Brigades attacked the forces after preparing two buildings to blow them up, which led to the killing of at least 21 soldiers and officers and the injury of dozens, according to the official Israeli announcement.


According to an analysis of satellite images published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, between 144,000 and 177,000 buildings have been damaged in the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the aggression until this week. While a Washington Post investigation reported that 350 schools and 170 mosques and churches in the Gaza Strip had been destroyed by the occupation army by the time the investigation was published last month.


The Haaretz report stated that the widespread destruction caused by the occupation army in Gaza led to discussions in academic circles about the possibility of blaming Israel for destroying “the living environment of the people of Gaza.” She explained that this term refers to destruction committed as obstacles against residents, in a way that does not allow the restoration and resettlement of a residential environment.


Field executions

These testimonies come at a time when the Palestinian Prisoners' Club, on Wednesday, accused Israel of committing a "death penalty" against dozens of Palestinians, the day after the bodies of 30 dead people were found bound in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip.


The club said in a statement: “Yesterday (Tuesday) in Beit Lahia, north of the Gaza Strip, it was revealed that the bodies of 30 martyrs were found inside one of the schools that was besieged by the occupation.”

It also added: “It became clear, through the observations of those present at the scene, that the martyrs were handcuffed and blindfolded, that is, they were under arrest,” considering that “a clear indication that the occupation carried out a field execution against these people.”


It added, "Data regarding the executions of detainees from Gaza is increasing in light of the continuation of genocide in Gaza, in addition to the continuation of the crime of enforced disappearance against Gaza detainees after 117 days."


The club also noted "an increase in testimonies from detainees who were released, over the past period, about torture, abuse and humiliation, including testimonies from women and children."


It considered that "the occupation's insistence on keeping Gaza detainees under enforced disappearance has only one explanation, which is that there is a decision to isolate them, with the aim of carrying out more crimes against them in secret."


The club pointed out that "the occupation authorities refuse to provide human rights institutions, including the relevant international and Palestinian ones, with any information regarding the fate and places of detention of detainees to date, including the martyrs detained in Gaza."


New massacres

Earlier Wednesday, the Ministry of Health in Gaza announced that the number of victims of the Israeli war on the Strip had risen to 26,900 martyrs and 65,949 injured since October 7, 2023, in a statement issued by the Ministry in which it presented the latest statistics on “the 117th day of the brutal Israeli aggression.” On the Gaza Strip.


The ministry said: “On the 117th day of the war, the toll of the Israeli aggression rose to 26,900 martyrs and 65,949 injuries since the seventh of last October.”


It also stated that "the Israeli occupation committed 16 massacres against families in the Gaza Strip, claiming 150 dead and 313 injuries during the past 24 hours."


Then it continued: “There are still a number of victims under the rubble and on the roads, and the occupation prevents ambulance and civil defense crews from reaching them.”


Since October 7, 2023, the Israeli army has been waging a devastating war on Gaza, with most of its victims being children and women, according to the Palestinian authorities, and causing “massive destruction and an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe,” according to the United Nations.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 7:06 am - Jerusalem Time

Borrell: What is happening in Gaza is a scar on the public conscience

European Union Foreign and Security Policy Commissioner Josep Borrell considered that the ongoing crisis in the Gaza Strip constitutes a scar on the public conscience.


Borrell wrote on the “X” platform (formerly Twitter): “What is happening in Gaza is a scar on our common conscience.”

He pointed out that UNRWA's work, against the backdrop of the investigation into the involvement of its employees in the October 7 attack, continues to be "humanitarian assistance in the Gaza Strip."


Washington and European countries announced the immediate suspension of funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees, UNRWA, following Israeli allegations of the participation of Gaza employees of the agency in the October 7 attack.


The European Union revealed a similar measure, which portends an additional humanitarian catastrophe that may exacerbate the crises of the Gazans


The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized what it described as an Israeli campaign against UNRWA, and Hamas denounced the termination of employee contracts “based on information derived from Tel Aviv.”


UNRWA, which was established to help refugees since the 1948 war, provides educational, health services and assistance to Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.


The agency also helps about two-thirds of the Gaza Strip's population of 2.3 million people and has a pivotal role in providing aid during the ongoing war.




ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 7:00 am - Jerusalem Time

The Chicago City Council issues a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza

The Chicago City Council approved a resolution calling for an unconditional ceasefire in the Israeli war on Gaza.


After hours of debate, the measure was reduced to one vote — Mayor Brandon Johnson's — with the council vote ending at 23 yes and 23 no. Johnson's tie-breaking vote brought the measure to 24 yeas and 23 nays.


The council was initially expected to vote on the resolution last week, but the vote was postponed because the council instead supported a resolution supporting an international day for Holocaust awareness.


The resolution, sponsored by Councilwoman Danielle Laspata, calls on Congress and President Joe Biden to “facilitate lasting peace in Gaza, starting with a permanent ceasefire.”


“Now we move forward to use this victory as inspiration to continue demanding that Joe Biden stop supporting genocide against our people,” Hatem Abu Dayyeh, national president of the American Palestinian Community Network (USPCN), said in a statement.


As is usual, Jewish groups described the decision as “dangerous.”


The resolution was passed in Chicago by the City Council's Health and Human Relations Committee last month.


After postponing the decision last week, Johnson said he supported a ceasefire in the war-torn region.


He added: “At this stage now, I think we are looking at 25,000 Palestinians killed during this war, and the killing must stop.”

OPINIONS

Thu 01 Feb 2024 6:09 am - Jerusalem Time

The Silence of the Damned

 Chris Hedges

Chris Hedges

Opinion Writer

Our leading humanitarian and civic institutions, including major medical institutions, refuse to denounce Israel’s genocide in Gaza. This exposes their hypocrisy and complicity.



There is no effective health care system left in Gaza. Infants are dying. Children are having their limbs amputated without anesthesia. Thousands of cancer patients and those in need of dialysis lack treatment. The last cancer hospital in Gaza has ceased functioning. An estimated 50,000 pregnant women have no safe place to give birth. They undergo cesarean sections without anesthesia. Miscarriage rates are up 300 percent since the Israeli assault began. The wounded bleed to death. There is no sanitation or clean water. Hospitals have been bombed and shelled. Nasser Hospital, one of the last functioning hospitals in Gaza, is “near collapse.” Clinics, along with ambulances – 79 in Gaza and over 212 in the West Bank – have been destroyed. Some 400 doctors, nurses, medics and healthcare workers have been killed — more than the total of all healthcare workers killed in conflicts around the world combined since 2016. Over 100 more have been detained, interrogated, beaten and tortured, or disappeared by Israeli soldiers. 

Israeli soldiers routinely enter hospitals to carry out forced evacuations – on Wednesday troops entered al-Amal Hospital in Khan Younis and demanded doctors and displaced Palestinians leave – as well as round up detainees, including the wounded, sick and medical staff. On Tuesday, disguised as hospital workers and civilians, Israeli soldiers entered Jenin’s Ibn Sina Hospital in the West Bank and assassinated three Palestinians as they slept. 

The cuts to funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) — collective punishment for the alleged involvement in the Oct. 7 attack of 12 its 13,000 UNRWA workers  —  will accelerate the horror, turning the attacks, starvation, lack of health care and spread of infectious diseases in Gaza into a tidal wave of death. The evidence-free charges, which include the accusation that 10 percent of all of UNRWA’s Gaza staff have ties to Islamist militant groups, appeared in the Wall Street Journal. The reporter, Carrie-Keller Lynn, served in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Given the numerous lies Israel has employed to justify its genocide, including “beheaded babies” and “mass rape,” it is reasonable to assume this may be another fabrication. 

The allegations, of which details remain scant, are apparently based on confessions by Palestinian detainees — most certainly after being beaten or tortured. These allegations were enough to see 18 countries including the U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, France, Australia and Japan cut or delay funding to the vital U.N. agency. UNRWA is all that stands between the Palestinians in Gaza and famine. A handful of countries, including Ireland, Norway and Turkey, maintain their funding. 

Eight of the UNRWA employees accused of participating in the Oct. 7 attack in southern Israel, where 1,139 people were killed and 240 abducted, were fired. Two have been suspended. UNRWA has promised an investigation. They account for 0.04 percent of UNRWA’s staff. 

Israel is seeking to destroy not only Gaza’s health care system and infrastructure, but UNRWA which provides food and aid to 2 million Palestinians. The object is to make Gaza uninhabitable and ethnically cleanse the 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza. Hundreds of thousands are already starving. Over 70 percent of the housing has been destroyed. More than 26,700 people have been killed and over 65,600 have been injured. Thousands are missing. Some 90 percent of Gaza’s pre-war population has been displaced, with many living in the open. Palestinians have been reduced to eating grass and drinking contaminated water.

Noga Arbell, a former Israeli foreign ministry official, during a discussion in the Israeli parliament on Jan. 4, stated: “It will be impossible to win the war if we do not destroy UNRWA, and this destruction must begin immediately.”

“UNRWA is an organization that perpetuates the problem of the Palestinian Refugees,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in 2018. “It also perpetuates the narrative of the so-called ‘right of return’ with the aim of eliminating the State of Israel, and therefore UNRWA must disappear.”

An unnamed senior Israeli official praised the suspension of funding to UNRWA, but insisted on Wednesday gggthe government was not calling for its closure. 

More than 152 of UNRWA’s employees in Gaza — including school principals, teachers, health workers, a gynecologist, engineers, support staff and a psychologist — have been killed since the Israeli attacks began. Over 141 UNRWA facilities have been bombed into rubble. The death toll is the largest loss of staff during a conflict in the U.N.’s history.

The destruction of healthcare facilities and targeting of doctors, nurses, medics and staff is especially repugnant. It means the most vulnerable, the sick, infants, the wounded and elderly, and those who care for them, are often condemned to death.

Palestinian doctors are pleading with doctors and medical organizations from around the world to decry the assault on the healthcare system and mobilize their institutions to protest. 

“The world must condemn the acts against medical professionals happening in Gaza,” writes the director of Al-Shifa hospital, Muhamad Abu Salmiya, who was arrested along with other medical personnel by the Israelis in November 2023 while evacuating with a World Health Organization (WHO) convoy, and who remains in custody. “This Correspondence is a call for every human being, all medical communities, and all health-care professionals around the world to call for these anti-hospital activities inside and around the hospitals to stop, which is a civilian obligation according to international law, the UN, and WHO.”

But these institutions — with a few notable exceptions such as The American Public Health Association that has called for a ceasefire — have either remained silent or, as with Dr. Matthew K. Wynia, the director of the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado, attempted to justify Israeli war crimes. These doctors — who somehow find it acceptable that in Gaza a child is killed every 10 minutes on average — are accomplices to genocide and stand in violation of the Geneva Convention. They embrace death as a solution, not life. 

Upgrade to paid

Robert Jay Lifton in his book “The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide” writes that “genocidal projects require the active participation of educated professionals — physicians, scientists, engineers, military leaders, lawyers, clergy, university professors and other teachers — who combine to create not only the technology of genocide but much of its ideological rationale, moral climate, and organizational process.” 

A group of 100 Israeli doctors in November 2023 defended the bombing of hospitals in Gaza, claiming they were used as Hamas command centers, a charge Israel has been unable to verify. 

The deans of U.S. medical schools and leading medical organizations, especially the American Medical Association (AMA) have joined the ranks of universities, law schools, churches and the media to turn their backs on the Palestinians. The AMA shut down a debate on a ceasefire resolution among its members and has called for “medical neutrality,” although it abandoned “medical neutrality” to denounce Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

There is a cost to denouncing this genocide, a cost they do not intend to pay. They fear being attacked. They fear destroying their careers. They fear losing funding. They fear a loss of status. They fear persecution. They fear social isolation. This fear makes them complicit. 

And what of those who do speak out? They are branded as antisemites and supporters of terrorism. George Washington University clinical psychology professor Lara Sheehi was pushed out of her job. The former head of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth, was denied a fellowship at Harvard’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy because of his alleged “anti-Israel bias.” San Francisco professor Rabab Abdulhadi was sued for supporting Palestinian rights. Shahd Abusalama was suspended from Sheffield Hallam University in the U.K after a vicious smear campaign, although the institution later settled her discrimination claim against it. Professor Jasbir Puar at Rutgers University is an ongoing target for the Israel lobby and endures constant harassment. Medical students and faculty in Canada face suspension or expulsion if they publicly criticize Israel. 

The danger is not only that the Israeli crimes are denounced. The danger, more importantly, is that the moral bankruptcy and cowardice of the institutions and their leaders are exposed.

This brings me to Dr. Rupa Marya, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), whose call to halt bombing hospitals and to examine the impact of Zionism as a racist ideology unleashed a torrent of vitriolic attacks against her, attacks tacitly endorsed by the medical school where she works. 

She has been slandered as an antisemite and targeted by the Canary Mission, a Zionist organization that seeks to defame and destroy the careers of students and faculty that criticize Israel and defend Palestinian rights. She has had speaking engagements rescinded and received death threats and messages such as: “kill yourself you retarded grifting n*gger,” “Jew baiting c*nt,” and “White people are the greatest people on Earth. You know this.” 

You can see her statement on the campaign against her here.

There is a striking contrast between the treatment of Dr. Marya and the physicians who cheer on the genocide. UCSF physician Matt Cooperberg, who is the Helen Diller Family Chair in Urology, ‘liked’ social media posts such as “REMOVE Palestinians FORM [sic] MAP” and a quote by former Israeli prime minister Golda Meir: “We are able to forgive the the [sic] arabs for killing our children. We are unable to forgive the arabs for forcing us to kill their children.”

“Cooperberg’s endowed chair comes from the Helen Diller Family Foundation, UCSF’s largest donor, which to date has gifted some $1.15 billion dollars to the health campus,” Marya writes. “In 2018, due to a mistake on a tax form, the Helen Diller Family Foundation was exposed as a funder of the Canary Mission. The Foundation attempted to erase its connection after this exposure.”

She goes on:

As a faculty member at UCSF, disgraced dermatologist Howard Maibach exposed and injected over 2,600 imprisoned Black and brown people with chemicals in experiments that echoed the experiments put on trial at the Doctors’ Trial just a few years before he went to medical school in Pennsylvania,” she goes on. “There he studied under Albert Kligman, who taught him how to exploit Black people for medical experimentation, documented extensively in the horror nonfiction book, Acres of Skin.  Maibach also advanced notions of racial differences in skin, furthering racist ideas from the pseudoscience of eugenics. Race is a social construct that enshrines supremacism. It is not a biological reality.

Most of Maibach’s experiments were conducted without informed consent, and while UCSF issued an apology, Maibach is still employed by the University of California. His family supports the Friends of the IDF, and he is represented by Alan Dershowitz, who also argued for the bombing of hospitals in Gaza. Dershowitz attempted to prevent me from speaking at the AMA’s first National Health Equity Grand Rounds, where scholar Harriet Washington, who studies medical experimentation on Black people, highlighted Maibach’s racist practices. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, UCSF faculty, trainees and students of color brought Maibach’s story to light, and many have expressed their horror that they have to continue to sit in the same room as this man during Dermatology Grand Rounds. But the problem is not just one man. It is a system that allows someone with these values and actions to continue to be present in our learning and practicing community.

The dehumanization of Palestinians is lifted from the playbook of all settler colonial projects, including our own. This racism, where people of color are branded as “human animals,” is coded within the DNA of our institutions. It infects those chosen to lead these institutions. It lies at the core of our national identity. It is why the two ruling parties and the institutions that sustain them side with Israel. It feeds the perverted logic of funneling weapons and billions of dollars in support to Israel to sustain its occupation and genocide. 

History will not judge us kindly.  But it will revere those who, under siege, found the courage to say no. 

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 6:04 am - Jerusalem Time

An American judge supports “international justice” despite rejecting a lawsuit to stop support for Israel

A US federal judge in Oakland, California, rejected a lawsuit to stop US support for Israel based on a judicial precedent, but stressed that “the conclusive evidence before this court is consistent with the conclusions of the International Court of Justice.”


He added that evidence indicates that the Israeli army's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza may constitute genocide.


The judge believed that "it is the duty of every individual to confront the siege of Gaza, but the court must remain within the scope of its jurisdiction."


He added that the court calls on the defendants to "study the consequences of their steadfast support for the siege of the Palestinians in Gaza."

PALESTINE

Thu 01 Feb 2024 5:54 am - Jerusalem Time

War on Gaza: Dozens of Palestinians found dead at elementary school in zip-tied body bags

Bodies of Palestinians were discovered at the Khalifa Bin Zayed school in Beit Lahia which at one point sheltered thousands of displaced people

Dozens of Palestinians were found dead at a school in the northern Gaza Strip in black body bags tied with plastic cables bearing Hebrew writing.

The bodies of 50 Palestinians were discovered at the grounds of the Khalifa bin Zayed elementary school in Beit Lahia on Tuesday after Israeli forces withdrew from the area, local residents told Middle East Eye.

The bodies were discovered under a mound of rubble at the school with videos uploaded on social media sites showing several of the body bags tied with white plastic zip ties, normally used for tying cables together.

According to eyewitnesses assisting in identifying the deceased, Israeli forces reportedly executed the Palestinians nearly two months ago on a road near the school.

The school had served as a shelter for thousands of displaced Palestinians before it was bombed and besieged by Israeli forces in early December. The school had been supported by United Nations Relief and Works Agency, also known as Unrwa, since 2010.


Hossam Shabana, a photojournalist working in northern Gaza, said that some of the victims included families, such as Abu Srour Abu Salah, 52, and his wife. The remains of an unidentified child were also discovered at the site.

"The bodies were removed from graves created by citizens in the shelter center [school], and they were abused and searched [by Israeli forces]," Shabana said. "These bodies were reported to have been handcuffed and blindfolded.

"After the occupation exhumed the graves and subjected the bodies to abuse and searches, the Israeli army proceeded to cover the bodies with nylon [sheets of plastic and the body bags] and discard them into what appeared to be a mass grave.

"Following the army's withdrawal from the area, a municipal member used heavy machinery to clear the debris left by Israeli bombings. It was then that the residents noticed the presence of the bodies," Shabana added.

MEE reached out the Israeli army for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication.

The grizzly discovery comes a day after more than 100 Palestinian bodies that were exhumed and taken by Israeli forces from various areas in the Gaza Strip were returned for a mass burial in the southern city of Rafah. 

Some of the bodies were unidentified when they were reburied while others had heavily decomposed, the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported. 

Later on Tuesday, the head of Hamas's political bureau, Ismail Haniyeh, said his group was studying a proposal that would offer Palestinians in Gaza six weeks of respite from fighting in exchange for the release of Israelis held captive in Gaza as well as the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel.

Haniyeh, who is based in Qatar, said Hamas was open to any "serious" initiatives provided they led to a "comprehensive cessation" of hostilities and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

His comments came after officials from Qatar, Egypt and the US met Israeli intelligence chiefs in Paris this weekend to discuss the release of some 136 Israelis held captive in Gaza.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Hamas would release elderly captives, along with women and children, in exchange for Palestinian prisoners during an initial period of six weeks.

If that was successful, there could be another two phases of swaps, with male Israeli soldiers eventually included.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Monday that he could not confirm the details of the proposal, but referred to it as "a strong one and a compelling one".

Ben Gvir lashes out at proposal

The Israeli prime minister's office called the talks "constructive", but noted that there were "significant gaps which the parties will continue to discuss".

For weeks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right government have vowed to remain in Gaza until Hamas is eliminated.

Speaking from an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank on Friday, Netanyahu said: "We will not compromise on anything less than total victory.

"That means eliminating Hamas, returning all of our hostages and ensuring that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel," he added.

However, Hamas political bureau member Mohammad Nazzal told Al Jazeera on Tuesday that an agreement to release the Israeli captives could only be possible with a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

"We told the mediators a permanent ceasefire is our goal, but we can do it in the second or third stages of an agreement. Without an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, we can't accept this new proposal," Nazzal said.

Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir threatened on Tuesday to bring down the government if a "reckless" deal was reached with Hamas.

"A reckless deal = the dismantlement of the government," the far-right minister said on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Israel's relentless military offensive on the besieged Gaza Strip, which was launched after the 7 October attacks, has killed at least 26,637 Palestinians, most of them women and children.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 5:50 am - Jerusalem Time

Netanyahu to Lapid: Join Israeli war government, receive Justice Ministry

According to the report, Yesh Atid's joining the government would not entail removing other parties from the government but would entail a redistribution of the government ministries.

  •  
  •  
  •  

The Likud offered the opposition party Yesh Atid to place one of its members as justice minister instead of current Justice Minister Yariv Levin in exchange for it joining the government, Kan journalist Ze'ev Kam reported a "senior Likud minister" as saying on Wednesday.

According to the report, Yesh Atid's joining the government would not entail removing other parties from the government but would entail a redistribution of the government ministries in order to "broaden it even more during the period of the war and afterward." This would include removing additional ministries from the current coalition members and giving them to Yesh Atid.

A similar offer was made to National Unity if it will commit to staying in the government for a longer period, the report added. National Unity joined the government a few days after the Hamas massacre on October 7. It entered five ministers into the government, but all are currently ministers-without-portfolio. National Unity has said that it plans to leave the government when the security situation stabilizes.

OPINIONS

Thu 01 Feb 2024 5:41 am - Jerusalem Time

The solitude of the genocide

LA PRESSE NOUVELLE MAGAZINE

LA PRESSE NOUVELLE MAGAZINE

Opinion Writer

By Dominique Vidal

Sometimes a photograph speaks louder than long speeches. This is the case: it represents Benjamin Netanyahu addressing the United Nations General Assembly last fall – in this case facing an overwhelming majority of empty seats. There is no better way to symbolize the loneliness of the Israeli Prime Minister in the midst of the Gaza War, which he hoped would save him.This is not an optical effect: within the UN enclosure, Israel has never been so isolated. Certainly, the United States has, on several occasions, used its right of veto to spare its “strategic ally” condemnation from the Security Council, or even sanctions.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres invoked Article 99 of the UN Charter – one of the most powerful tools at his disposal – to urge the Security Council to help end the carnage in the Palestinian enclave ravaged by war.

Faced with the blocking of the Security Council by the United States, an emergency meeting of the General Assembly was therefore convened on December 12. Before the vote, General Assembly President Dennis Francis said the world was witnessing an "unprecedented collapse" of a humanitarian system "in real time" and said it was high time to establish an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. “We have one priority – just one –: saving lives,” he stressed. “We must stop this violence now ([1])”. The Assembly therefore adopted – by 153 votes for, 10 against and 23 abstentions, more than the required two-thirds majority – a resolution which, in addition to a cease and desist -immediate humanitarian fire, demanded the unconditional release of all hostages and the guarantee of humanitarian access. It also reiterated the demand that all parties respect their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, “particularly with regard to the protection of civilians”

A few days later, Israel suffered another diplomatic defeat. On December 19, 2023, the General Assembly adopted, as every year, a resolution supporting “the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to a state” by 172 votes in favor, 10 abstentions and only 4 against: Israel, the United States , Micronesia and Nauru[2]…

Without forgetting the first response of the International Court of Justice to the complaint for “genocide” filed by South Africa and supported by around sixty States by calling on Israel, on January 26, to take “all measures in its power to prevent and punish direct and public incitement to commit genocide[3]”

This quasi-UN consensus reflects the accelerated evolution of public opinions vis-à-vis Israel. The latter declined massively for the first time in 1982, after the invasion of Lebanon and the massacre of the Palestinian camps of Sabra and Chatila, south of Beirut. Anger grew further with the repression of the First Intifada (from December 1987) then the Second (from September 2000). Without forgetting the incessant Israeli offensives against the Gaza Strip: 20o8-2009, 20112, 2014, 2021. This time, tens, even hundreds of thousands of demonstrators flooded into the streets of the capitals of all continents : from Washington to London, from Berlin to Montreal, from Dublin to Cairo, from Saana, and Tunis to Rabat, from Beirut to Amman That the most massive crowds marched in the major Arab cities will only surprise those who believed in the cause Palestinian buried under the Abraham Accords.

But never has the gap between leaders and ruled seemed as deep in the Maghreb as in Machrek. Thus the latest survey by the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (CAREP) carried out among 8,000 respondents in January 2024 and published under the title “Arab Punic opinion and Israel's war against Gaza[4]” confirms -the massive refusal (89%) of any normalization with Israel at the expense of the Palestinian people: only 8% of respondents in sixteen Arab countries “would support diplomatic recognition of Israel by their state”, 84% would “oppose” it ". And for good reason: 92% believe that “the Palestinian cause concerns all Arabs and not just the Palestinian people”. Concerning the current war in Gaza, 69% of respondents said they support “the population of Gaza and Hamas”, 90% of whom believe that it is “different from the Islamic State”.

This survey also reveals a hardening of Arab opinion regarding United States policy in the region: 76% present it as “more negative than before the war”; In particular, 68% of respondents consider their commitment to the establishment of a Palestinian state “not at all serious”. In the same spirit, 79%, 78% and 75% of respondents evaluate the positions of France, the United Kingdom and Germany negatively. As for the debate over the legitimacy of the Hamas attack; 67% believe that it is a “legitimate resistance operation”, while 19% assess it as a “legitimate resistance operation tainted with some errors” and only 5% consider it an “illegitimate operation” .

This reduces the room for maneuver of Arab regimes wishing to join the process launched in 2020 by Donald Trump. This was undoubtedly one of the main objectives of the terrorist operation of October 7: to prevent the conclusion of the Israeli-Saudi negotiations then underway.

Without doubt it is in his own country that Netanyahu is most alone. Unlike all previous wars, a large majority of public opinion supports the army's action while demanding the resignation of the Prime Minister. It is true that the attack of October 7 occurred against the backdrop of nine months of gigantic demonstrations against the "coup d'état" represented by the justice reform project: hence the massive rejection of his inspiration. From the beginning of October, 86% of Israelis – and even 79% of voters in the current coalition judged the leader of Likud to be responsible for the catastrophe([5]). And since then, Likud has never fallen so low: in the latest polls in the event of an early election, it would lose 17 of the 32 seats obtained on November 1, 2023. Its allies of the supremacist far right would only obtain 7 deputies instead of 14. And even the ultra-orthodox Party Sephardic Shas would only have 9 of its 11 seats left. So much so that the current coalition lost the majority with 44 seats instead of 64 today[6].

The most worrying thing is elsewhere: 28% of Israelis would consider leaving their country if the justice reform was implemented[7]. This is a clear acceleration of a phenomenon which has already seen hundreds of thousands of Israeli Jews settle permanently abroad.

[1]  https://news.un.org/fr/story/2023/12/1141572

[2]  https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4030703?ln=fr

[3] https://www.icj-cij.org/.../192-20240126-ord-01-00-fr.pdf

[4] https://www.carep-paris.org/.../Enquete_opinion_arabe...

([5]) Haaretz, 17 octobre 2023. 

[6] Site de Radio J ,12 janvier 2024 .

[7] Site du Times of Israel, 26 juillet 2023.

ARAB AND WORLD

Thu 01 Feb 2024 5:34 am - Jerusalem Time

Lapid: We are ready to join the government instead of Ben Gvir and Smotrich in order to rescue the prisoners

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid said, in a surprising statement, on Wednesday, that he is ready to join the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, instead of the extremist Ministers of National Security, Itamar Ben Gvir, and Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, in order to “rescue” the prisoners in the Gaza Strip.


This came in an interview with the private Channel 12, a day after he said that he would provide a “safety net” for the government for any deal that would return the prisoners to their homes.


Lapid said during the interview: “We are ready to join the government instead of Ben Gvir and Smotrich, in order to rescue the kidnapped people.”


For its part, the Likud Party, led by Netanyahu, responded to Lapid’s statement, in a brief statement, in which he said: “Lapid is pushing for an immediate end to the war without achieving complete victory, and we will not agree to that.”


On Tuesday, Lapid pledged, in a blog post on the “X” platform, to provide Netanyahu’s government with a “safety net” for any deal that would return Israeli prisoners from Gaza, in light of Ben Gvir and Smotrich’s rejection of a prisoner exchange deal that includes stopping the war, even for weeks.


Earlier Wednesday, Ben Gvir, leader of the far-right Jewish Power party, said in a speech in the Knesset, “It is not permissible for Israel to extend a helping hand to an illegal deal, and our soldiers did not fall in vain, and it is forbidden to reach a deal that exposes its security to danger and stops the war.” 


He added: "Hamas must not be allowed to win, and we will not agree to the release of thousands of killers from prisons," as he put it.

On Tuesday, Ben Gvir threatened to dissolve the government if a new deal was reached, expressing his rejection of what he called “American pressure to conclude a deal” to exchange prisoners.


On Sunday, a meeting was held in Paris, with the participation of Israel, the United States, Egypt and Qatar, to discuss a prisoner exchange deal and stop the war in Gaza, which will take place in three stages, according to Palestinian and American sources.


The United States, Egypt and Qatar are in contact with Israel, while Egypt and Qatar are in contact with Hamas, to reach a second agreement to release Israeli prisoners from Gaza, in exchange for the release of Palestinian detainees from Israeli prisons and a ceasefire in Gaza.


Tel Aviv estimates that there are about 136 Israeli prisoners in Gaza, while it holds at least 8,800 Palestinians in its prisons, according to official sources from both parties.



#Yair Lapid

PALESTINE

Wed 31 Jan 2024 10:48 pm - Jerusalem Time

Hamas: The Paris meeting proposal includes the withdrawal of the occupation forces and enabling the return of the displaced

Sources close to Hamas, Egypt and Qatar confirmed on Wednesday that the movement is studying an official proposal to reach a “truce” to be implemented in three stages with the Israeli occupation, noting that the first stage includes “the withdrawal of Israeli forces and enabling the return of the displaced to Gaza and the northern Gaza Strip.”


Hamas had said earlier that it was studying the proposals drawn up by the mediators in Paris in preparation for declaring a second truce in the war that has been going on for four months.


In November, Israel and Hamas reached a truce that lasted for a week, but sources indicate that the expected truce will last for six weeks.

According to a source close to Hamas and the mediators Egypt and Qatar, the first phase of the truce will include Hamas releasing between 35-40 Israeli detainees, including women, children, and sick men over 60 years old.


In return, Israel releases between 200-300 Palestinian prisoners, without this number including prisoners with high sentences. Israel also allows aid to flow into the Gaza Strip at a rate of 200-300 trucks per day.


The second phase will see Hamas release reserve soldiers in exchange for a number of Palestinian prisoners to be negotiated.


The second phase also includes the release of soldiers and officers imprisoned by Hamas and other factions in exchange for Israel releasing a number of Palestinian prisoners who will be negotiated in a round of indirect negotiations that will take place between 4-6 weeks after the implementation of the agreement begins.


The third stage of the truce includes, according to the sources, the release of the bodies of the dead prisoners from both sides and an agreement on the crossings and the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.

The sources indicated that Egypt and Qatar will follow up on the implementation of the agreement in coordination with the United States.

On Wednesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ruled out withdrawing his forces from the Gaza Strip.


Israel awaits Hamas' response

According to the Hebrew newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, the Israeli occupation state made a great effort to reduce the number of Palestinian prisoners and their “quality” that the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) could request, in exchange for concluding a new deal through mediators.


This proactive Israeli step comes despite Hamas having not yet announced its demands publicly regarding the number of prisoners it can demand for each Israeli detainee.


The move also joins statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, yesterday, Tuesday, that Israel will not release thousands of prisoners, and will not withdraw its army from the Gaza Strip before achieving Israeli goals.


However, a number of Israeli political and military analysts believe that completing the deal will require Israel to make major concessions, which will be reflected in the government, in light of a number of ministers threatening to reject it, and Netanyahu will also have to decide in order to conclude the deal or reject it.


Source: (AFP, Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed)

ARAB AND WORLD

Wed 31 Jan 2024 9:44 pm - Jerusalem Time

Netanyahu to ambassadors to the United Nations: It is time to end UNRWA's mission

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said today, Wednesday, that “the time has come for the international community and the United Nations itself to understand that UNRWA’s mission must end,” in a meeting he gathered with a delegation that includes ambassadors of foreign countries to the United Nations, considering that “there are agencies Other United Nations and other state organizations must replace UNRWA.”


This comes within the framework of the Israeli campaign that has been ongoing for years and has escalated in light of the ongoing war on the Gaza Strip, which has been besieged for 117 days, against the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), in an attempt to liquidate the Palestinian refugee file, by fighting the agency that was established in Decembe 1949, to provide aid to refugees.


Netanyahu's statements came during his meeting with the ambassadors of Western countries supporting Israel at the United Nations and international forums, which include the countries: Malta, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Ukraine, Slovenia and Sierra Leone, in the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, in the presence of Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan.


As part of his continued attack on the United Nations, Netanyahu said, “The United Nations is not a distinguished organization when it comes to dealing with Israel, as it is often incredibly biased. It has a Human Rights Council, so to speak, that devotes a large portion of its decisions against Israel.” He did not issue a single decision against Iran, Yemen, or other places where there is cruelty and aggression.”


He continued, "I do not mean that what is required of them is to condemn these countries and us, because Israel is waging a war of civilization against barbarism, and because it is responding to brutal attacks carried out without provocation on our part, and because it is doing so with the greatest effort ever devoted by any army to reduce the harm to civilians as much as possible" while we fight against an enemy committing a double war crime."


Netanyahu repeated the Israeli allegations that the occupation authorities did not provide any evidence that occurred during the attack of last October 7, including “slaughtering and raping women and men, beheading them after raping them, burning children while they were still alive, and many other atrocities, which we only saw such things practiced against the Jews in the Holocaust."


In evidence that the escalating Israeli campaign against UNRWA came in the wake of the decision of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netanyahu said, “South Africa had the audacity to raise this matter to the International Court of Justice and accuse us of committing the crime of genocide. What is more horrific than that are the many false accusations that are not “The unfounded allegations that we were accused of in The Hague were presented by UNRWA employees, and in the past few weeks we discovered that UNRWA employees participated in the massacre,” he said.


He added, "It is time for the international community and the United Nations to understand that UNRWA's mission must end. The agency is working to perpetuate itself. It seeks to preserve the Palestinian refugee issue. We must replace it with other UN agencies and other relief organizations, if we want to solve the Gaza problem as we plan to do." 


He continued, "There are other agencies affiliated with the United Nations, there are other agencies in the world that must replace UNRWA." He claimed that "Hamas infiltrated UNRWA. The organization works in the service of Hamas, in its schools and in other places. I say this with great sadness, because we wanted an objective and useful body to provide assistance. We need such a body today in Gaza. UNRWA is not this body. It must be "It is replaced by an organization or organizations that takes over the task."


Guterres: UNRWA is the "backbone" of humanitarian efforts in Gaza

For his part, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, affirmed today that UNRWA is “the backbone of all humanitarian efforts in Gaza,” and appealed to all countries “to ensure the continuity of UNRWA’s life-saving work,” after several countries suspended funding for the agency following Israel’s accusation 12 One of its employees was implicated in the attacks of last October 7.


Guterres told a United Nations committee concerned with Palestinian rights, “Yesterday I met with donors to listen to their concerns and determine the steps we are taking to deal with them... UNRWA is the backbone of the humanitarian response in the entire Gaza,” while UN agencies confirmed that suspending funding for UNRWA “is a dangerous matter and may lead to the collapse of the humanitarian system in Gaza.


Guterres stressed that "the humanitarian system in Gaza is collapsing." He added, "I am deeply concerned about the inhumane conditions experienced by 2.2 million people in Gaza as they struggle to survive without any basic necessities."


Following the Israeli allegations, 18 countries and the European Union decided to suspend funding for UNRWA. These countries include: the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan, Italy, Britain, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, New Zealand, Iceland, Romania, Estonia, Sweden, in addition to the European Union.

ARAB AND WORLD

Wed 31 Jan 2024 7:43 pm - Jerusalem Time

Jewish members of the US House of Representatives discuss alternatives to UNRWA with an Israeli official

On Wednesday, Axios published a report saying that a group of Jewish Democratic representatives in the US House of Representatives discussed on Tuesday (1/30/2024) potential alternatives to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) to deliver aid to Gaza, in a meeting. With the Israeli military liaison official with Palestinian civilians.


The meeting comes after the United States and eight other countries stopped funding the Palestinian refugee agency after Israel accused a number of UNRWA employees of involvement in Hamas’ surprise attack on Israel last October 7.


UNRWA has been the main channel for humanitarian aid in Gaza since 1949.

According to the website, “Approximately eight to ten Jewish Democrats met with Colonel Elad Goren, a senior official in the IDF’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories unit, according to four members who were present at the meeting.”


Goren offered about six potential alternatives to UNRWA, including UNICEF and the United Nations World Food Programme, according to the lawmakers.


One member, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said: “The point he was trying to make is that we want there to be humanitarian aid, but UNRWA represents a problem. There must be alternatives. There are alternatives already, and these are the alternatives that we should "Use it."


The website attributes to Representative Dan Goldman (Democrat from New York State), who was present at the meeting, saying that he "hopes that we will take a look at those other international non-governmental organizations that may be able to help manage the humanitarian crisis and provide assistance to alleviate it.”


In turn, the Commissioner-General of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, said in a statement on Saturday that it was “shocking” to see nine countries withdrawing their funding due to allegations against “a small group of employees.”


Lazzarini said the decision was particularly surprising given that the agency had taken "immediate action" by expelling the accused and opening an investigation.


“It would be highly irresponsible to impose sanctions on an agency and the entire community it serves over allegations of criminal acts against certain individuals, especially in a time of war, displacement and political crises in the region,” he said.


Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the US ambassador to the United Nations, said on Tuesday that “fundamental changes” must be made before funding resumes, but “we should not let that overshadow the great work that UNRWA is doing.”


According to the site, Goren claimed that Israel had done its best to facilitate the flow of aid to Gaza and repeated his public denial of the occurrence of mass starvation in the region.


One representative said: "He questioned the level of hunger and the availability of food, that there are still open markets operating, and that the Israelis are willing to send more aid."


Two lawmakers also cited stifling inspection restrictions as the main reason for not sending more aid to Gaza.


Goren said that Israel "is making great efforts to make sure that it does everything it can to find out who is involved with Hamas and who is truly a civilian," according to Goldman.


In turn, the official spokesman for the US State Department, Matthew Miller, said on Tuesday: “What I would like to say is, first and foremost, we have made clear our position in the statement we issued; you heard Secretary (Anthony Blinken) talking about this yesterday. We strongly support the work "What UNRWA is doing. We believe it is extremely important. There is no other humanitarian player in Gaza who can provide food, water and medicine to the scale that UNRWA does."


The spokesman added in his response to the Al-Quds correspondent’s question, “We want to see this work continue, and for this reason it is very important for the United Nations to take this issue seriously, investigate it, and for there to be accountability for anyone proven to be involved in committing violations, and to take further actions and appropriate measures to ensure this kind of thing does not happen again."

ARAB AND WORLD

Wed 31 Jan 2024 7:31 pm - Jerusalem Time

The US State Department is considering recognizing the Palestinian state

US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, issued instructions to officials in his ministry to work on studying the possibility of American and international recognition of the State of Palestine within the framework of the American vision for the future of the Palestinian issue on the “day after” the ongoing Israeli war on the Gaza Strip, which has been besieged for 117 days.


This came according to what the correspondent of the Israeli “Walla” website and the American “Axios” website reported, today, Wednesday, from two high-ranking officials in the American administration, following statements issued by the British Foreign Secretary, David Cameron, in this regard, pointing to “diplomatic initiatives aimed at achieving irreversible progress towards a two-state solution.”

ARAB AND WORLD

Wed 31 Jan 2024 7:23 pm - Jerusalem Time

Washington: Postponing United Nations mission to assess the situation in Gaza

The US State Department announced that the formation of a United Nations mission to study the situation in Gaza, and the mission’s visit to the Gaza Strip, has been postponed, due to renewed battles in the northern Gaza Strip.


This came in a statement by US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller during his daily press conference.


In response to a journalist’s question: “The Minister (Anthony Blinken) announced the formation of a UN assessment mission during his recent visit to Israel. Is there any updated information on this subject?” Miller replied: “This mission was postponed due to the outbreak of the conflict in the north (Gaza)” once again".


Miller pointed out that field conditions are not suitable for carrying out a humanitarian mission and conducting a proper assessment in the sector.


He said: "We are in contact with the United Nations and the Israeli government regarding this issue. We want this mission to be established as soon as possible."


Miller added that they closely monitored the field conditions to establish the mission and make its first visit to the region.

ARAB AND WORLD

Wed 31 Jan 2024 5:37 pm - Jerusalem Time

Hebrew Press analysis: Israel's emergency government close to collapse as Gaza war continues

By YANIR COZIN

The question is no longer whether an election will take place in 2024, but rather when in 2024.

‘The Americans have realized that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is incapacitated because of the political situation he is in,” a senior official from one of Israel’s opposition parties informed me last week.

“In fear of voters’ reaction, moreover, Netanyahu has even gone as far as to conceal his transition to Stage 3 of the war not only from his own war cabinet, but also from the general public.”

Netanyahu’s political predicament is already straining the Biden administration’s patience, with a growing sense that they are providing considerable support without receiving anything from him in return.

While the Americans are compelled to take Netanyahu’s political affairs under consideration, he, in turn, is unwilling to extend the same goodwill gesture toward the Democratic candidate currently residing in the White House, who is facing a challenging and tumultuous reelection campaign.

There is a reason why John Kirby, the US’s National Security Council spokesperson, stated this week that Israel has already shifted to a low-intensity conflict in the North and is expected to undergo a similar transformation in regard to the South.

This completely contradicts Netanyahu’s assertion the previous day, in which he claimed that warfare has intensified in the southern region of the Gaza Strip. The Americans are exposing Netanyahu’s bluff, despite his attempts to keep the Israeli public in partial darkness concerning the way this war is being conducted.

The butterfly effect of the intensifying voices of unease emanating from Washington is creating ripples that are impacting Jerusalem’s political landscape. Even at this stage of the war, marked by slow progress and by military achievements that are not apparent to an untrained eye, there is room for freedom of thought in terms of the political possibilities that could follow.

Gantz's influence over the war is diminishing

Gantz knew what he was getting into. He was called naïve at first, but this is a man who was already stung once before by the political scorpion that is Benjamin Netanyahu, when Gantz joined the Covid unity government. He came into this current government with eyes wide open, hopeful that after October 7, something might have changed in Israel’s most seasoned politician.

It had, but that did not last long. Presently, many in the political sphere believe that Gantz is devising his exit strategy. When will he leave? To answer that question, we must understand the power dynamics within the government, specifically within the war cabinet. Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot, a minister without a portfolio, joined the emergency government to embody the well-worn political slogan of ‘pulling their weight,’ contributing their share, and actively participating in the war effort. Both entered the military arena, securing two of the five seats in the national emergency unity government’s war cabinet, and have emerged as two of the most pivotal players in the war’s management. However, now that we have marked the 100th day since they joined, it seems that their influence on the war’s management is diminishing. 

There are several examples of this, the most prominent of which revolves around the hostages’ release. It has been more than 50 days since the last hostage was set free, and it seems like Israel is limping along, with little sparks of hope for the 136 hostages who are still being held captive in Gaza in tunnels and secret locations, rising, then falling. Every few weeks, Hamas releases additional sadistic videos which often disclose the tragic news that a few more hostages have been murdered. Eisenkot believes that it is time to stop and consider where the war machine needs to be led next, and whether the victories Israel has achieved so far have reached a point that justifies considering a ceasefire in exchange for the release of the hostages. He has argued that at the very least, this option should be explored. “We need to stop lying to ourselves,” Eisenkot states. “We must be courageous and aim for an acceptable deal that will bring all of the hostages’ home. 

Time is running out, and each passing day is putting their lives in further jeopardy. We cannot stick blindly to the same strategy while the hostages are still in captivity. Now is the critical stage in which bold decisions must be made. Otherwise, we may as well throw in the towel.” Up until now, Eisenkot has been perceived as a somewhat unremarkable politician, not drawing much attention due to his perceived neutrality and lack of charisma. In recent weeks, however, he has been gaining prominence, as he articulates opinions that resonate with public sentiment. In my opinion, if a popularity poll were to be conducted now, Eisenkot, who recently buried his son who was killed in Gaza, would garner high approval ratings. 

Returning to discussing the war cabinet, Eisenkot and Gantz are up against Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Netanyahu, who believe that exerting military force is the key to overcoming Hamas and securing the release of our hostages, echoing the strategy that preceded the previous hostage release. Yet, 50 days have passed without significant progress. This issue could turn into an Archimedean point that could force Gantz and Eisenkot to withdraw from the government. Meanwhile, both feel that they still hold sway over decisions, and as long as IDF soldiers are still fighting in Gaza, the war must go on. 

Furthermore, stepping down at this juncture carries significant political risks, since such a decision could be interpreted as Gantz and Eisenkot escaping responsibility, which could critically damage the number of seats the currently popular National Unity party could secure in the future. Netanyahu, of course, is acutely aware of these considerations, and has been actively working to exert control. As we have depicted in the past, Netanyahu is the type of politician who never stops planning for the day after. 

That is, their day after. To achieve this, he has been focusing on strengthening his coalition, as what is acceptable during normal times, is not so during wartime, since the prime minister has found little room to make a move in the cabinet. While war cabinet meetings have been scheduled to address what the day after the war will look like for Israel, a comprehensive discussion on this matter has yet to take place. In fact, senior IDF officials have remarked that if the government does not take a stance soon, the IDF will be forced to return to areas that it had already conquered, then relinquished.

Netanyahu is postponing discussion on the day after 

Why is Netanyahu postponing this discussion?

He gives a different excuse each time. Once it was because of ministers Miri Regev’s and David Amselem’s dispute with the IDF’s chief of staff. Another time, he claimed that meeting would interfere with another, the more important issue of Israel defending its case at The Hague. Netanyahu feared that ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir would advocate for the resettlement of the Gaza Strip and exiling all of the Palestinians there, which could undermine Netanyahu’s official policy, which states that Israel has no intention of forcing Palestinians to leave Gaza. I am analyzing this issue from a political standpoint, as Gantz for weeks now has been advocating holding the discussion on the war in Gaza and its implications for Israel, the country’s economy, and the education of our children. Each time, this request has been denied. 

The prime minister’s favorite verb is ‘postpone.’ Why do today what can be postponed until tomorrow, or the next day, or some other unspecified date in the future? Therefore, despite Gantz being in the war cabinet, Netanyahu is not relying on him and his people to vote in favor of far-reaching proposals, and instead is clinging to his right-wing base. The day Gantz resigns from the government, Netanyahu will still need these individuals in his camp. This past Wednesday, perhaps in an attempt to cool Gantz down, two items were published in the media almost simultaneously. It was reported that a senior Likud official had proposed to Yair Lapid and also to Avigdor Lieberman to join the government in exchange for prestigious portfolios, even suggesting they could have Ben-Gvir’s role. Both turned down the offer, each for his own reasons: Lapid because he is unwilling to sit in a government led by Netanyahu; Liberman since the Likud refused to let him join the war cabinet. The fact that both news items were published almost simultaneously raises the possibility that there are individuals within the Likud who initiated this move as a signal to Gantz that there are alternatives to replace him should he decide to abandon ship. Nevertheless, very quickly, like many other recent maneuvers orchestrated by Netanyahu, the swift rejections from Lapid and Liberman underscored the likelihood that this was yet another spin. The bottom line is: Will this emergency government last much longer? The prevailing understanding is that it will not, and with the diminishing prospects of a new hostage deal, the likelihood of the emergency government breaking up increases. Recent rumors about serious contacts between the US and Qatar are one of the reasons Gantz and Eisenkot are choosing to remain in the government, as without them, they believe there would not be much chance for a new deal to release the hostages. 

Moreover, and this seems to be true, the two of them are asking themselves, what difference would it make if they resigned. Would that lead to a new election? Would it bring down the government? Even if Gantz and Eisenkot step down, Gideon Sa’ar, the leader of the New Hope party, which is part of the National Unity bloc, would most likely remain. Returning to Gantz and Eisenkot, they are well aware that no tangible opportunities await them in the private sector, and their current popularity in the polls could wane and eventually dissipate. Meanwhile, Likud MKs are grumbling about their party’s leadership, and yet the war, their seat and position prevent them from shifting their support away from Netanyahu. 

The current political landscape indicates that if the emergency government with the National Unity bloc were to collapse, Netanyahu’s 64-member bloc would still be able to return to power. Only a robust internal opposition from within Likud could potentially break apart the narrow right-wing government, and lead to elections or the formation of an alternative government with a different leader from within Likud, who could garner support from both within the Likud, as well as from opposition parties. At present, the latter scenario seems unlikely, and almost everyone is talking about elections. The question is no longer whether an election will take place in 2024, but rather when in 2024. Most coalition members have no desire to hold an election anytime soon, since they already have their budget for the year, have nailed down good positions, and are in no hurry to let the people have their say, even though so many Israelis are hurting now. Everyone, except perhaps for Ben-Gvir, who despite his colossal failure to curb crime in Israel is continuing to climb in the polls. It seems that the ongoing war and the distribution of weapons to emergency standby squads are working in his favor. In the end, a new hostage release plan has the potential to profoundly alter the political landscape, keeping Gantz and Eisenkot in the government, and prompting a strategic shift in the war’s management and in new objectives. 

This would, however, necessitate that the prime minister engage in what he dislikes most: Making decisive and difficult decisions. Netanyahu prefers to hold long-winded discussions, take lots of time to think through all scenarios and refrain from taking conclusive action.

While this works well in politics, it is much less effective when people's lives hang in the balance. In other words, a new hostage deal could lead to the unintended side effect of strengthening the emergency government, but this would just be a side effect, and the primary goal is to bring all the hostages home safely, alive, and well.

 

PALESTINE

Wed 31 Jan 2024 5:27 pm - Jerusalem Time

West Bank: Israeli armed settlers assaulted an elderly Palestinian and threatened to kill him

Today, Wednesday, armed settlers assaulted an elderly Palestinian citizen in Masafer Yatta, south of Hebron.


Local sources said that a group of settlers wearing the uniform of the Israeli occupation forces assaulted, with rifle butts, the citizen Gabriel Musa Noman in the “Aqawawis” area of Masafer Yatta, which led to him sustaining bruises. They also forced him at gunpoint to stay in the house and not go out with his sheep to the pastures which he owns, and threatened to kill him unless he complied with that.


In the same context, a group of settlers, under the protection of the Israeli occupation forces, chased the shepherds in the “Shaab al-Batm” area and prevented them from reaching pastures, while those forces allowed the colonists to enter their flocks of sheep into the citizens’ fields and destroy them.

OPINIONS

Wed 31 Jan 2024 5:27 pm - Jerusalem Time

Gaza, the world and us

Translation for " Al-Quds" dot com /Media Part

Translation for " Al-Quds" dot com /Media Part

Opinion Writer

By Ziad Majed

Franco-Lebanese politician, university professor


Since the start of this war in Gaza, the gap between continents and geographic areas, tensions and fractures within several countries have widened like never before. There is unfortunately and serious concern that we live in a world which is witnessing a clear decline in universal values and legal conventions common to humanity.


Since October 8, 2023, we have been experiencing the deadliest and most brutal war ever documented and transmitted live. In 15 weeks, more than 30,000 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli army (60% of children and women), and more than 80% of the population of 2.2 million Gazans besieged in 360 km2, already victims of 4 wars and a long blockade (since 2007) is displaced and crowded in the southern part of the devastated sector[1].


The figures, stories, videos and testimonies published and updated regularly by the various UN agencies, humanitarian and human rights organizations as well as by the brave Palestinian journalists and photographers on site, show us the suffering, the famine, the destruction. homes and infrastructure, water, fuel and electricity cuts, inhumane sanitary conditions and the ordeal of the sick, injured, amputees, treated with makeshift means and operated on without anesthesia.


Meanwhile, in the West, governments and a majority of television channels have decreed that this tragedy was collateral damage of a war of “self-defense” that Israel is waging following the deadly Hamas attacks on October 7. .


To this form of contempt for the Palestinians and for international humanitarian law have been added the contributions on most television sets, from non-specialist speakers who spout nonsense and question, in all ignorance and arrogance, the extent Palestinian human losses and the reality on the ground.


Moreover, a media platform was regularly granted to the spokespersons of the Israeli army to allow them to justify their “operations”. For the latter case, these soldiers have in fact very rarely been put in a position to have to account for the documented and filmed crimes perpetrated by their army.


The silence of universities and professional bodies

It is not improbable that this state of affairs has led segments of Western public opinion (which have little access to serious and credible newspapers and information sites) to be surprised by the speech denouncing war crimes, crimes against humanity and the horrors taking place in Gaza, carried by officials of international organizations, as well as by real specialists, journalists and researchers.


It is therefore not surprising to note that South Africa's prosecution of Israel before the International Court of Justice for genocide is for many Westerners incomprehensible, at a time when it has aroused such significant echoes in Africa, Asia and South America, where tens of millions of people followed the proceedings of the historic hearing at the Hague tribunal on January 11 and 12, 2024 and that of the court's announcement of interim measures on January 26 of the same month.


What, however, arouses astonishment is to see categories capable of discernment and politicized, particularly among those responsible for university, research and hospital institutions and press unions, plunging into a sort of lethargy and exonerating themselves. of their moral and civic responsibility with regard to the tragedy in Gaza.


How can we explain why entire professional bodies can remain silent or timidly discuss in an informal setting massacres targeting their Palestinian colleagues?

More than 300 caregivers (doctors, nurses, assistants and paramedics) were killed in Gaza, 24 hospitals and 62 clinics were totally or partially destroyed, more than 100 ambulances were targeted and put out of service.


Israeli fire killed 115 journalists and photographers, most of whom were directly targeted.


According to careful documentation, the Israeli army killed 94 university professors, 231 teachers and more than 4,300 students, in addition to destroying or wantonly bombing 4 universities and 346 schools (including 65 managed by UNRWA). )[2]. To these are added dozens of artists, poets and writers massacred in what seems to be a war of extermination of education and culture, not only of the present and past of Gazans ( dozens of places of religious worship, buildings and archaeological and tourist installations were totally or partially destroyed), but above all their future.


What more is needed for initiatives or at least press releases to denounce these horrors and demonstrate solidarity with the Palestinian counterparts?


Why is it unthinkable for Western hospitals or medical orders to issue statements or organize symbolic demonstrations in solidarity with targeted Palestinian healthcare workers?


If some are misled by the effect of the media, why don't they take the trouble to check and inquire about what is happening with their colleagues from Médecins du Monde, Médecins sans frontières, the Organization World Health Organization and the International Committee of the Red Cross?


What about the almost daily killing of Palestinian journalists to prevent them from covering an area forbidden by Israel to foreign journalists if they are not escorted and controlled in their work by its soldiers? Do they not deserve mobilization in favor of the opening of international investigations into their assassination and especially the boycott of the Israeli army (and its spokespersons) who assassinated them?


The most significant and probably the most challenging remains the silence of the majority of major university and cultural institutions in the face of the crimes which systematically affect academics, researchers and writers, in addition to the voluntary destruction, sometimes filmed and celebrated by the soldiers themselves. , Palestinian establishments.


What then are the pedagogical function and the objectives of teaching if they are cut off from reality? How can we legitimately teach the human sciences, international law, journalism without having a legal or at least moral position on the daily killings of our fellow human beings, which is in agreement with the messages and values that we transmit?


How can we interpret the passive and silent attitude, under the pretext of “scientific neutrality”, of certain European and American research centers specializing in the “Middle East” or international relations while Palestinian research institutes are annihilated?


What knowledge is there in question if it is blind to what is happening a few hours' flight from us, and if it deserts the classrooms of our scientific establishments?


In reality, not only did silence and non-indignation reign, but in several cases also universities, schools and sports clubs exerted pressure and threatened to take coercive measures against any initiative of “support for the Palestinians”. .

Additionally, book fairs, arts and sporting events have seen programs and guests banned due to their critical stance on Israel's crimes. This atmosphere has resulted in the spread of a culture of self-censorship contrary to the very principle of freedom of thought and expression.


We are entitled to wonder whether a tragedy of this magnitude with these appalling data would have produced a similar effect if the geography of the conflict, its demographics and the skin color of its victims had been different.


Gaza and the future of democracies

There is unfortunately and serious concern that we live in a world which is witnessing a clear decline in universal values and legal conventions common to humanity. Since the start of this war in Gaza, the gap between continents and geographic areas, tensions and fractures within several countries have widened like never before.


In addition, Western democracies, in crisis today and some societies of which are affected by increasingly racist and populist political options, are losing credibility and tarnishing the attractiveness of their political model. This is dangerous not only for them but for the rest of the world.


Because despite their economic policies, their imperialism and the brutality of their colonial history, the freedoms existing in their systems, the philosophy of their institutions and universities, their constitutions, the richness of their cultures, their arts and the systems of human rights that They were instituted after World War II and have for decades attracted and inspired democrats and progressives in various parts of the globe. Particularly those living in the shadow of tyranny, oppression, corruption and rejecting the so-called “alternative” models of Russian and Chinese imperialism (and dictatorships).


The shameful position of the vast majority of governments of these Western democracies on the destruction of Gaza and its people in 2023 and 2024 is an open wound difficult to heal for hundreds of millions of citizens of this world.


It will be imperative, after the war machine stops, for all those dismayed by the extent of the double standards, the variable geometry indignations and the dehumanization of the Palestinians, to gather their forces wherever possible. possible, in order to overcome the installed divide.


New citizen and political movements, networks and coalitions must emerge and come together to bring a new universalist discourse and fight against “the impunity of the powerful” and the hierarchy of victims of wars and massacres according to their affiliations, and according to the places where their aspirations and hopes are murdered…

OPINIONS

Wed 31 Jan 2024 5:17 pm - Jerusalem Time

Palestine Will Survive, Deeply Wounded — Israel’s Future Hangs In the Balance

IDN- In Depth News

IDN- In Depth News

Opinion Writer

By Jeffrey D. Sachs*

It is easy to be cynical about the international rule of law. No sooner had the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that Israel is plausibly committing genocide against the Palestinian people than the U.S. State Department declared, “We continue to believe that allegations of genocide are unfounded and note the court did not make a finding about genocide or call for a ceasefire in its ruling…” Israeli leaders declared the case to be “outrageous” and “antisemitic.” Yet the risks for Israel of the ICJ ruling, and its follow-up in the next year or two, are profound. If Israel spurns the Genocide Convention, it imperils its place within the community of nations.

True, the ICJ provisional ruling by itself will not end Israel’s war in Gaza or perhaps the mass killing of the Palestinian people, already at 26,000 and rising (with 70 percent women and children). The ruling by itself will not end America’s complicity in Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians. Israel could not fight the war in Gaza one more day without the U.S. providing the munitions and other military support.

Yet the ruling has started the clock on Israel’s future. If Israel continues to act with impunity and finds itself declared as genocidaire in the ICJ’s final ruling, Israel will become a pariah state. Young Americans in particular will pull the plug on U.S. backing for Israel. Israel will stand utterly alone, condemned by the world.

Most of the 193 governments in the United Nations already disdain Israel’s behavior. Most see a country that has occupied the neighboring territories of Palestine for 57 years (since the 1967 war), that has scorned and failed to act on dozens of votes by the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly, and illegally and blatantly settled more than 700,000 Israelis in the occupied territories.

Most UN member states hear clearly the expressions of visceral hatred by many Israeli leaders toward the people of Palestine. For example, the statement by Israeli President Herzog blaming all of the people of Gaza, as cited by the ICJ; and they understand clearly the intention of today’s Israeli government to occupy Palestine and rule over the 7 million Palestinian Muslims and Christians living in Israel and Palestine today. South Africa brought the ICJ case against Israel in part because it knows murderous apartheid rule when it sees it, and it sees apartheid rule in Israel’s ongoing domination over the Palestinian people.

Israelis should understand that the U.S. cannot—and will not—save Israel in the long run.

Israel has so far not been deterred by global opinion because of its nuclear weapons, its messianic zeal, and most importantly, the military, financial, and public backing of the United States, including its votes in the UN Security Council and General Assembly. Moreover, the U.S. and Israel have acted on the belief that the offer of American money and weapons systems to the Arab nations would induce them to turn their backs on Palestinian people. Israel and the U.S. act with supreme arrogance, believing that military might makes right and that money talks. Yes, Israel also acts out of fear of the Palestinians, but that is the overbearing and grossly unjustified fear of the underdog, the conquered, and the displaced. By recognizing and making peace with an independent state of Palestine, Israel would remove the hate and humiliation that fuels support for Hamas, and thereby diminish the threats that lead to Israel’s own fears.


Israelis should understand that the U.S. cannot—and will not—save Israel in the long run.


It will not do so any more than America has “saved” South Vietnam; Iran after the U.S.-U.K. coup in 1953; Afghanistan after 2001; Iraq after the U.S. overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003; Syria after the U.S. attempted overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in 2011; Libya after the NATO overthrow of Moammar Qaddafi in 2011; or Ukraine since the U.S.-led coup in 2014. American military force is useless or worse in sustaining regimes that lack broad international support and legitimacy. America tires of each misguided military adventure and moves on, and will eventually do so vis-à-vis Israel if Israel becomes a pariah and outlaw state.

Nor will U.S. money and weapons systems carry the day with the Arab neighbors. The U.S. is at the end of its financial largesse. The U.S. public debt is already 122.9 percent of GDP and rising rapidly. There is no consensus in Washington, D.C. on how to stabilize the U.S. budget, but one point is clear: large support for foreign countries will not be part of the bargain. The cutoff of U.S. financing for Ukraine, despite the intense lobbying by the politically powerful military-industrial complex, is a vivid case in point. Even access to advanced U.S. weapons systems will not persuade Arab nations to abandon the cause of a Palestinian state. In any event, Russian, Iranian, North Korean, Chinese, and other advanced weapons systems will be on highly competitive offer in future years, and with better financing terms.


At the moment, the Israeli public ardently backs Israel’s brutality and slaughter in Gaza.


The public is gripped by a combination of overwhelming fear, religious zealotry, and state propaganda. Israelis widely believe that the Arab nations are implacably out to destroy Israel. They do not travel in the Arab countries and do not know or understand the attitudes and policies of those neighboring societies. They do not attend to the statements of Arab and Islamic leaders calling for peace based on the two-state solution because Israeli mainstream media, like U.S. mainstream media, is in the grips of relentless state propaganda, brain-deadening patriotism, and relentless war-mongering.

Israeli society is immeasurably traumatized by the Nazi Holocaust, which remains the central fact of modernity and memory of every Jewish family of European roots in any part of the world. An eventual finding by the world’s highest court that Israel itself has now become a perpetrator of genocide will therefore shake Israeli society to the roots and will rupture Israel’s social contract with world Jewry. At that very painful and very dire stage, Israeli public opinion may begin to reconsider its current assumptions.

Yes, despite the ICJ ruling Israel’s killing goes on, but under greatly heightened legal and political scrutiny. Every Israeli murder in cold blood, every bombing of a hospital, every destruction of a Palestinian school or university, every Israeli denial of food and water for Gazans, will be meticulously recorded by South Africa’s superb legal team, and by highly respected legal institutes around the world, including the Center for Constitutional Rights and Law for Palestine. All will be duly conveyed to the ICJ.

Palestine will survive the current horrific ordeal, deeply wounded but with strong worldwide backing. Israel’s future, by contrast, hangs in the balance, as it could soon find itself banished by the community of nations as a stark violator of international law. Israel urgently requires leaders who embrace international law over military force, humility over arrogance, and peacemaking over brutality. And Israel—no less than the United States—must come to understand the self-destructive futility of deploying military force to deny justice and political rights for the Palestinian people.


Dr. Jeffrey D. Sachs

*Dr. Jeffrey D. Sachs is Professor at Columbia University is Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has served as an adviser to three UN Secretaries-General, and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General António Guterres.

 

PALESTINE

Wed 31 Jan 2024 4:47 pm - Jerusalem Time

War on Gaza: 9 Palestinian citizens killed, including a child, in Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip

9 citizens, including a child, were killed, and others were injured, as a result of Israeli warplanes and artillery bombardment on citizens’ homes in the Gaza Strip.


Israeli warplanes launched raids on a house in the Al-Mughrabi area, southeast of Gaza, killing two citizens and wounding others.


Three citizens were killed, and dozens were injured, as a result of continued artillery shelling on the city of Beit Hanoun, north of the Gaza Strip. They were transferred to Kamal Adwan Hospital.


The occupation forces also bombed a vehicle north of the city of Rafah, killing 4 citizens, including a child, and wounding others.


Dozens of citizens were injured as a result of the Israeli occupation forces’ bombing of Yarmouk Stadium in Gaza City. They were transferred to the Baptist Hospital.

OPINIONS

Wed 31 Jan 2024 4:44 pm - Jerusalem Time

How Israeli settler terrorism set the stage for genocide in Gaza

Middle East Eye

Middle East Eye

Opinion Writer

By Eitay Mack

Attorney general Gali Baharav-Miara's failures started during the Huwwara pogrom in occupied Palestine with her silence and failure to enforce the law or any accountability

On Friday, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a provisional measure order requiring that "the State of Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip". Even Israeli judge Aharon Barak, who issued a dissenting opinion in the ICJ Gaza genocide case, supported this measure.

 

After South Africa filed its petition to the ICJ, in which statements by Israeli officials were used to prove intent to commit genocide in Gaza, there was criticism within Israel of the attorney general, Gali Baharav-Miara, for her silence.

 

 Her failures, however, did not start in Gaza but in the West Bank village of Huwwara. On 26 February 2023, about 400 far-right Jewish extremists participated in the Huwwara pogrom, where they spent hours setting on fire dozens of houses, apartments, chicken coops, shops, and hundreds of cars.

Several Israeli politicians encouraged the perpetrators of the pogrom both during and after its occurrence. Many of us demanded that the attorney general open a criminal investigation into all those who incited genocide. And though there were clear cases in which the connection between the incitement and the acts of violence was visible, we were largely dismissed by Baharav-Miara and met with a terse response to contact the police directly.

Violent incitement

Among the many responsible for last year's violent incitement was David Ben Zion, the deputy head of the settlers' Samaria Regional Council, who tweeted: "The village of Huwwara should be wiped out today…There is no room for mercy."

The attorney general only initiated a criminal investigation against one politician who has not been charged after nearly a year

A few days later, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who had "liked" Ben Zion's tweet, reiterated his directive at a forum hosted by the Marker business newspaper.

Smotrich said: "I think the village of Huwwara should be wiped out." Another far-right politician and member of the Knesset, Limor Son Har-Melech, tweeted about two hours after the start of the pogrom that she had arrived in Huwwara "to support the righteous cry of the hundreds of Samaria residents who went out to protest."

During the pogrom, Daniella Weiss, who heads the Nachala Settlement Movement, said in an interview with the Public Broadcasting Corporation: "I should appeal to people to leave Huwwara? I must call on them to stop? Stop what? We are protecting Jewish lives." The next day, in an interview with the Israeli Ynet radio, Weiss defined the pogrom as a "legitimate protest action".

The day after the pogrom, Knesset member Zvika Fogel also encouraged the violence in an interview with the radio station, Waves of Israel. "Huwwara closed and burned, that's what I want to see...I want to restore security to the residents of the State of Israel. How do you do that? Stop with the word 'proportionality'. Stop with the reluctance to collective punishment because it is not suitable for all kinds of courts. I take off my gloves," he said

 Given the brazen incitement of violence against the roughly 7,000 Palestinians who live there, it is no wonder that the pogrom in Huwwara lasted for several hours and that it led to a series of pogroms in the West Bank villages Orif, Lubban ash-Sharqiya and Turmus Ayya.

Despite the complicity of several Israeli leaders in these terroristic acts, the attorney general only initiated a criminal investigation against Fogel, who has not been charged after nearly a year.

Total impunity

In Israel, the law and the procedural rules confer to the attorney general the exclusive authority to initiate criminal proceedings against individuals. This is primarily due to the sensitivity to freedom of expression and the fact that potential suspects might be elected politicians.

The far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, was convicted of terrorist offences himself, and some of those who incited the attack on Huwwara are Israeli parliament members from his far-right, Otzma Yehudit party, and others related to it. Following his election, Ben Gvir took control of the police after the passage of the Ben Gvir law.

Not only did the attorney general not initiate a serious criminal investigation into the incitement against Huwwara, but she would not speak on the matter altogether. She only issued a warning on 9 January, just before the ICJ hearing. She claimed that law enforcement officials were examining statements and calls for intentional harm against civilians and warned that they might constitute criminal offences, including incitement.  In contrast to the attorney general, Yad Vashem, Israel's official memorial to the victims of the Holocaust, provided a more serious response to our letter. While it held that the rampage in Huwwara did not constitute incitement to genocide, the centre conceded that "any expression of violence, physical or verbal, is unacceptable, especially when it is directed in a sweeping and irrelevant way towards a certain group or community - as unfortunately happened in Huwwara".  It is also important to note that even if there were any legal obstacles to the attorney general initiating criminal charges on acts of incitement to genocide, her justification for not having done so, including in cases of violence and terrorism, is not clear.

To establish that incitement to violence and terrorism occurred, it is necessary to prove that a statement was made that either directly called for violence or, to a lesser extent, expressed praise, sympathy or encouragement for a violent act. The last requirement would be to prove that the statement led to the commission of an act of violence.

From incitement to genocide

In view of the attorney general's failure to enforce the law or any accountability in the Huwwara case, it is no surprise that Israeli officials and politicians took advantage of the climate, following the Hamas attack, in order to incite deadly harm against the entire civilian population in Gaza.

Not only did the attorney general not initiate a serious criminal investigation into the incitement against Huwwara, but she would not speak on the matter at all.  An example of this is the conduct of Knesset member Nissim Vaturi from the far-back benches of the Likud Party. Most Israelis likely have no idea what he has been doing in parliament since he was first elected in December 2020, except when he became a joke last summer after it was revealed that he invited Likud activists to join him on a cruise ship to the Greek islands at a discounted rate.

Not only did the attorney general not initiate a serious criminal investigation into the incitement against Huwwara, but she would not speak on the matter at all

Since November 2023, he has made headlines in Israel after calling for the burning of all of Gaza in interviews and posts on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. With no fear of criminal prosecution, on the day after the attorney general issued her warning that she would take action against violent instigators, Vaturi said again in an interview with the Kol Barama radio channel that Gaza should be burned, adding that "whoever remains there should be eliminated period. I have no doubt at all."  What is the reason for the inaction by the attorney general? On 26 March, one month after the pogrom in Huwwara, Baharav-Miara submitted her response to petitions filed at the Israeli Supreme Court to invalidate the appointment of Ben Gvir as the minister of national security due to his racist statements and criminal convictions for terrorism.

The attorney general declared her belief that there was no legal impropriety in his appointment and that the court should dismiss the petitions. She even strangely wrote that "in recent years, the minister stated that he changed his ways and explained to his constituents on various occasions that racist ideas are not acceptable to him."  Given that senior members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and those in the parliament have explicitly supported violence, terrorism and genocide against the Palestinians, any criminal proceedings initiated against them would be seen across the political spectrum in Israel as an attempt to overthrow a democratically elected government.  It seems therefore that the attorney general preferred politics to fulfilling her professional role. Only time will tell if the ICJ's order will change her priorities.


Eitay Mack

Eitay Mack is an Israeli lawyer and human rights activist located between Jerusalem and Oslo. He represents Palestinians who were harmed by Israel's security forces in the occupied West Bank, and led legal proceedings that failed to stop the training in Israel of Indian police officers serving in Kashmir and to reveal information about Israeli snipers' shooting of protesters in the Gaza Strip.