PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 6:26 pm - Jerusalem Time

Change in the names of the members of the "Gaza Committee"... and an imminent meeting of factions in Cairo

A well-informed Palestinian source from Ramallah revealed a change in the names of the members of the Gaza Strip management committee, which is about to be announced, during an anticipated meeting of Palestinian factions in Cairo within a day or two, noting that Palestinian Health Minister Majed Abu Ramadan is not currently being considered.

Sources, who declined to be named, said that "Cairo is arranging for a factional (Palestinian) meeting within a day or two," stressing that "there has been talk from Cairo with the Fatah movement, but in general, the movement does not participate in any factional meeting that is not based on the movement's pillars of commitment to the Palestine Liberation Organization and its obligations, international legitimacy, one law, one political system, one weapon, and the unity of institutions and geography."

Sources revealed that "there is a designation for an administrative committee for the Gaza Strip (during the upcoming meeting) by President Trump and partner countries, and there is currently no problem with the names," revealing that changes have occurred in the names and the Palestinian Health Minister is no longer being considered.

He explained that the technocratic administrative committee will most likely be formed of a chairman and members, and without a vice-chairman so far, and most of the names are "outside what was proposed and circulated."

Sources stressed that "the firm Palestinian position is that the committee's reference should be the legitimate Palestinian government, in a way that does not reinforce division and ensures the sovereignty of the State of Palestine, as the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the State of Palestine alongside the West Bank, including Jerusalem, considering it the most important guarantee for the success of the administrative committee's work."

Regarding the participation of the "Fatah" movement, sources explained that "Cairo is making efforts for representatives of the movement to attend, but it adheres to the aforementioned pillars for participation, and the developments that may occur in the coming hours are unknown."

Last Tuesday, Palestinian sources said that Cairo would host a Hamas delegation this week to push for a Gaza agreement. This was confirmed by other well-informed Palestinian sources, stating that "a Hamas delegation will arrive in Cairo on Sunday evening to discuss arrangements for the transition to the second phase."

Meanwhile, Hussam Badran, a member of the political bureau of the "Hamas" movement, said on Sunday afternoon that "the delegation has not yet arrived without specifying a date for the visit."

On Saturday, Bishara Bahbah, head of the "Arab Americans for Peace" committee and a mediator in Gaza, said that the information he received indicates that President Trump will announce the "Peace Council" overseeing an interim administration for the Strip on Tuesday, January 13, followed a day or two later by the formation of the Palestinian technocratic committee during meetings in Cairo.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 6:11 pm - Jerusalem Time

Cold-related deaths in Gaza rise to 21, including 18 children

The government media office in the Gaza Strip announced today, Sunday, that the number of deaths due to severe cold in displacement camps has risen to 21, including 18 children, as a result of the consequences of the Israeli genocide that has lasted for two years.

This came in a statement from the office, the day after the announcement of the death of infant Mahmoud Al-Aqra, one week old, due to severe cold that caused him to shiver before he passed away at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in the central part of the Strip, according to Adnan Al-Aqra, the child's father.

The office warned of the catastrophic humanitarian repercussions resulting from the severe cold waves hitting the Gaza Strip, in light of the ongoing (Israeli) genocide and suffocating siege, and the widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure, and the forced displacement of more than one and a half million Palestinians.

It added that the number of deaths due to severe cold has risen since the start of the genocide on October 8, 2023, until today, Sunday, to 21 martyrs, all of whom are displaced people from forced shelter camps, and confirmed that among the deaths are 18 children, a dangerous indicator of the magnitude of the humanitarian catastrophe threatening the lives of the most vulnerable groups.

On Friday, a new low-pressure system accompanied by rain and stormy winds began in the Strip, while the Palestinian Meteorological Department said yesterday that there remains a chance of scattered showers in some areas with strong winds reaching speeds of up to 60 kilometers per hour at times.

The government media office pointed out that the number of deaths due to severe cold since the beginning of the current winter season last December reached 4, in the absence of heating means, lack of safe shelter, shortage of blankets and winter clothes, and the continued prevention of sufficient humanitarian aid.

It also strongly warned of the repercussions of subsequent low-pressure systems, and the accompanying waves of frost and severe cold in the coming days, which threaten to increase the number of victims, especially among children, the sick, and the elderly.

The government media office in Gaza held the Israeli occupation fully and directly responsible for these crimes and deadly outcomes, considering them an extension of policies of slow killing, starvation, and displacement.

It called on the international community, the United Nations, and humanitarian and human rights organizations to take immediate and urgent action to provide safe shelter centers, and to allow the entry of heating and relief supplies without restrictions, and to save what remains of lives before it is too late.

On Saturday, the Palestinian Civil Defense in Gaza said in a statement that the current low-pressure system caused thousands of displaced people's tents to fly away and be damaged, stressing that this crisis is a direct result of Israel's prevention of building materials and obstruction of reconstruction.

During the low-pressure systems that have hit the Strip since last December, dozens of residential buildings damaged by previous Israeli shelling collapsed, resulting in casualties.

In a related context, the Ministry of Health in the Gaza Strip announced that the death toll of Palestinian victims due to the Israeli genocide since October 2023 has risen to 71,412 martyrs and 171,314 injured.

The ministry said in a statistical statement that the Strip's hospitals received 3 martyrs and 9 injuries during the past 48 hours.

The Ministry of Health reported that Israel has killed 442 Palestinians and injured 1,236 others in its violations of the ceasefire agreement since last October 11.

In addition to the victims, the genocide, which Israel began on October 8, 2023, with American support, and lasted for two years, left massive destruction affecting 90% of the civilian infrastructure in the Strip, with a reconstruction cost estimated by the United Nations at about 70 billion dollars.

ARAB AND WORLD

Sun 11 Jan 2026 6:10 pm - Jerusalem Time

The Israelization of the United States, its Security, and the Emptying of Law of its Meaning

Washington – "Al-Quds" Dot Com - Said Erekat 

News Analysis


The escalating killings by law enforcement agencies in the United States can no longer be viewed as a series of individual errors or isolated field excesses. What is forming before us, with increasing clarity, is a doctrinal shift in American security philosophy, a shift that is steadily approaching the Israeli model based on one principle: preemptive killing as a tool of governance. It is an "Israelization" of the security mindset, not only in tools, but in logic, language, and the justification of violence.


From a State of Law to a State of Suspicion


The essence of the modern state rests on two principles, and no third: the presumption of innocence, and the monopoly of violence within strict legal limits. However, what we are witnessing today in the United States is the emptying of these two principles of their content. Suspicion has become sufficient for shooting, hypothetical danger has become a justification for actual killing, and investigation is postponed until after the funeral.


This logic is not new to the Israeli experience, where a "potential threat" is treated as a full-fledged crime. The new – and dangerous – aspect is its import into the American interior, in a civilian context where there is no occupation, no declared war, and no permanent state of emergency that is supposed to justify the suspension of rights.


"Kill First" as an Unspoken Doctrine


The United States does not need a formal declaration to adopt the "kill first" doctrine. It is enough to observe the behavior: shooting before negotiation, neutralizing the body instead of containing the situation, and granting immunity instead of accountability. In this doctrine, a human being is not seen as having rights, but as a deferred danger that must be eliminated before it materializes.


Here precisely the American and Israeli experiences converge: the transformation of security from a public service to a tool of control, and from a means of protection to an end that justifies itself.


Federal Agencies: Militarization of the Interior


Israelization is not only manifested in local police violence, but in the rise of armed federal agencies operating with a military logic within the civilian space. These agencies, which enjoy broader legal immunities and weaker oversight, reproduce the Israeli model based on blurring the lines between military and civilian.


When cities become operational theaters, citizens potential targets, and patrols resemble rapid intervention units, we are not facing "law enforcement," but a national security doctrine imposed on society.


Media: Engineering Acceptance of Violence


The "kill first" doctrine is not complete without a media partner. In the Israeli model, the narrative is quickly built: the victim posed a threat, the bullet was necessary, and the ethical question is postponed indefinitely. The same scene is repeated in America: selective leaks, focus on the victim's record, and the absence of the full context of the act.


Thus, the public is not asked to think, but to adapt. Not accountability, but justification. Not justice, but anger management.


The most dangerous aspect of the "Israelization" of the United States is not the number of victims, but the redefinition of the citizen himself. In the new security system, the citizen is no longer a party to a social contract, but an element to be controlled. This transformation produces a state that sees its people as a field for control, not a partner in governance. And with every unpunished killing incident, the dividing line between authority and society is redrawn, not by law, but by fear, which opens the door to a slow, but systematic, collapse of the very idea of democracy.


From Exception to Rule


History teaches us that the most dangerous slips begin when the exception becomes the rule. What was previously justified by "emergency circumstances" has become a routine procedure. And what was considered a scandal has become a fleeting news item. This is the moment when societies lose their moral sensitivity and begin to coexist with violence as something natural.


The United States stands today at this crossroads: either restore the rule of law, or continue on a path that empties the Constitution of its spirit and transforms rights into revocable privileges.


American political elites are mistaken when they think that importing the Israeli model will bring security. The experience itself proves the opposite: preemptive killing does not produce permanent deterrence, but an endless cycle of violence. When the state is run by a doctrine of suspicion, everyone becomes a potential victim. And when force is prioritized over law, the system erodes from within. True security is not built on bullets, but on justice, and anything else is merely temporary management of chaos.


Conclusion: What America Do We Want?


The question is no longer whether the United States is Israelizing its security, but how far it will go down this path. Either a state that recognizes that security without accountability is deferred tyranny, or a state that chooses the easier path: shoot first, write history later.


But history, as all experiences show, does not forgive states that choose the bullet over the law.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 2:00 pm - Jerusalem Time

"Rage Demonstration" Shakes the Doors of the Occupation Government in Jerusalem, Chanting Against Crime and Displacement Policies in the Naqab

The Arab masses will no longer accept being easy prey for violence

Large crowds of Palestinians from the occupied interior gathered on Sunday in front of the office of the occupation government's prime minister in Jerusalem, as part of the nationwide "Rage Demonstration" called for by the High Follow-Up Committee for Arab Citizens of Israel.

This popular protest movement came to demand a halt to the bloodshed resulting from the rampant crime in Arab society, and to denounce what they described as the "complicity" of the police and government agencies affiliated with the occupation, in addition to defending the Naqab villages threatened with displacement.

Call to action from all regions

From the early morning hours, large groups of buses and vehicles set off from various towns in the Galilee, the Triangle, and coastal cities, where a main gathering point was organized at the "Latrun Junction" before heading collectively towards Jerusalem.

By midday, demonstrators had gathered in front of government headquarters, raising condemnatory slogans and pictures of crime victims, amidst a strict security cordon imposed by the occupation police around the area.

Mobilizing the street against "civilian massacres"

This demonstration comes as a translation of the decisions of the expanded meeting held recently in the city of Rahat, which included a selection of political leaders, Arab Knesset members, and representatives of the National Committee of Heads of Local Authorities, and the High Steering Committee for Arabs in the Naqab.

The demonstrators vented their anger at the inaction of the occupation's security establishment in curbing criminal gangs, considering that "lack of security" is a systematic policy to dismantle the Palestinian social fabric in the interior. The Naqab issue also emerged as a central concern, with participants chanting against home demolitions and the displacement of residents of unrecognized villages, emphasizing that steadfastness on their land is their only option.

Message from the "Follow-Up Committee"

The High Follow-Up Committee affirmed in the words of its representatives during the demonstration that this protest is only the beginning of a series of escalating steps, stressing that "the Arab masses will no longer accept being easy prey for violence or displacement schemes."

The committee called on the international community to pay attention to the dual existential dangers faced by Palestinians in the interior; between the bullets of crime and the bulldozers of settlement.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 1:04 pm - Jerusalem Time

Two martyrs in Gaza by occupation forces' bullets and shelling despite ceasefire

Two Palestinian citizens were martyred on Sunday as a result of shooting and shelling carried out by the occupation army in both the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood in Gaza City and the Al-Maghazi refugee camp in the central Strip, in a continued violation by the occupation of the ceasefire agreement announced nearly three months ago.

Palestinian medical sources reported the martyrdom of a citizen after being shot by occupation forces in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, south of Gaza City, while another citizen was martyred succumbing to his wounds sustained after shelling targeted a gathering of citizens in Al-Maghazi camp yesterday.

According to Palestinian sources, occupation vehicles stationed east and south of Khan Younis city continued heavy firing during the night and morning hours, coinciding with artillery shelling targeting the southern Al-Mawasi area of Rafah, and airstrikes launched by Israeli warplanes on various areas in the central and southern Strip.

In the northern Gaza Strip, the occupation army detonated booby-trapped vehicles around the Sheikh Zayed roundabout, and blew up residential buildings near the Abu Zaitoun area in Jabalia camp, while warships fired shells towards coastal areas north of the Strip, in addition to heavy shooting targeting the Al-Tuffah neighborhood east of Gaza City.

According to Palestinian data, the occupation has committed hundreds of violations since the agreement came into effect; resulting in the martyrdom of 439 Palestinians and the injury of 1223 others since last October 11.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:32 pm - Jerusalem Time

Nablus Under Siege: Occupation Forces Raid and Arrest Campaign in "Al-Yasmina"

Occupation forces continue to impose a tight siege on the city of Nablus, north of the West Bank, following a wide-scale raid on the Old City, specifically the Al-Yasmina neighborhood, which included a heavy deployment of forces and an arrest campaign.

It was reported that a special "Israeli" force had infiltrated the Al-Yasmina neighborhood before being discovered, leading to armed clashes with Palestinian resistance fighters, followed by the occupation pushing large military reinforcements into the city, including vehicles and foot soldiers.

According to what the occupation army announced, an "Israeli" soldier was moderately wounded by gunfire during the operation, and he was evacuated for treatment, while occupation forces began pursuit operations in the area, amidst continued military deployment and the closure of the Old City entrances.

In a related context, occupation forces arrested the young man "Hamido Zakari" from the Old City of Nablus during the raid.

For his part, the director of medical relief in Nablus, Ghassan Hamdan, reported that a Palestinian family survived after their vehicle was targeted in the vicinity of the Old City.

15 citizens suffered from suffocation due to inhaling tear gas during the occupation forces' raid on the Old City of Nablus, according to reports.

He clarified that among the injured was a 13-year-old child, noting that all injuries received field treatment on site, without the need for transfer to hospitals.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:26 pm - Jerusalem Time

Cairo hosts second phase talks: "Technocrat" committee to manage Gaza and the resistance's patience running out

All eyes are on the Egyptian capital on Monday, where the Egyptian leadership will hold a pivotal meeting to discuss arrangements for the "second phase" of the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip. This meeting comes at a highly sensitive time, amidst intensive efforts to overcome first-phase violations and launch the "civil administration" phase for the Strip.

Topping the agenda of the meeting, which will be chaired by the head of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service, Major General Hassan Mahmoud Rashad, is the formation of an independent "technocrat committee" to manage the affairs of the Strip. According to Palestinian sources, the intention is to select 15 professional figures with experience, away from factional disputes.

Dr. Majed Abu Ramadan, Minister of Health in Dr. Mohammed Mustafa's government, emerged as the most prominent candidate to lead this committee, given his local and regional acceptance. This committee will be entrusted with the tasks of "reconstruction" and organizing municipal and health services, preparing the Strip for a phase of "social mending" and recovery after the war.

The path to the second phase remains contingent on closing the files of the first phase; sources revealed high-level intelligence cooperation to assist Hamas in locating the burial site of the last Israeli prisoner in Gaza.

Completing this file is key to reopening the Rafah crossing in both directions, a condition insisted upon by Egypt and Palestinian forces to actually begin infrastructure repair.

Despite these negotiating atmospheres, the field is experiencing a state of turmoil; the Egyptian mediator received an "angry" message from the Al-Qassam Brigades, warning that "the patience of the resistance fighters may run out" in the face of repeated Israeli violations, the latest of which was the shelling that killed 14 Palestinians.

The resistance accuses Tel Aviv of "evasion" in implementing the withdrawal provisions and aid flow, and believes that Israeli claims of retaliation for "failed" rockets are merely a pretext to undermine the agreement. Therefore, tomorrow's Cairo meeting will be a real test of the Egyptian mediator's ability to curb escalation and push the "administrative committee" forward, to spare the Strip a new wave of bloodshed.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 12:26 pm - Jerusalem Time

"Elimination of Palestinian Presence".. The Dangers of the "Atarot" and "Nahalat Shimon" Projects on Jerusalem and Sheikh Jarrah

The so-called "District Planning and Building Committee" affiliated with the occupation authorities is preparing, on Monday, to discuss and approve two extremely dangerous settlement plans in occupied East Jerusalem.

The Jerusalem Governorate stated, in a comprehensive press release, that these moves represent a "qualitative escalation" aimed at determining the political fate of the city and geographically separating it from its depth in the West Bank.

The first plan targets the lands of the former "Jerusalem International Airport," where the occupation authorities intend to build about 9,000 settlement units on an area of nearly 1,243 dunams. This project is not merely urban expansion, but rather a human "settlement dam" that chokes communication between Jerusalem and Ramallah.

The Governorate affirmed that this plan seeks to erase the sovereign symbolism of the airport, which was seen as an aerial gateway for the future Palestinian state, and also falls within the vision of "Greater Jerusalem," which aims to annex 10% of the West Bank's area through a network of roads and tunnels connecting the settlements, while isolating Palestinian communities behind the annexation and expansion wall.

As for the second plan, it targets the heart of the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood (Al-Nuqa'a land), where it stipulates the demolition of homes of about 40 Palestinian families to establish a settlement comprising 316 housing units. This escalation is based on discriminatory laws that allow settlement associations to claim properties dating back to before 1948, while depriving the original owners of the same right to reclaim their properties in West Jerusalem and the 1948 lands.

The Governorate's warnings were strongly worded regarding the linking of these outposts to settlements in "Karem Al-Mufti" and "Jabal Al-Musharif," which means dividing the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood into two halves and completely isolating it, to establish a "settlement cordon" connecting the eastern and western parts of the city.

The Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood is a unique diplomatic and historical center, having hosted the historic "Shepherd Hotel," the PLO office, and a number of Arab consulates (Saudi, Iraqi, Kuwaiti, and Lebanese). Therefore, targeting it represents an attempt to erase the "Green Line" and change the city's urban identity.

The Jerusalem Governorate concluded its statement by emphasizing that these plans represent "crimes of forced displacement" that violate international law, stressing the continuation of action on all fronts to confront this settlement encroachment aimed at killing any chance for the establishment of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 10:58 am - Jerusalem Time

A Palestinian killed after being wounded in Hebron, Israeli soldier injured in clashes in Nablus

A Palestinian was martyred this Sunday morning, succumbing to wounds sustained from Israeli occupation forces' bullets on Saturday evening in the city of Hebron.

The Ministry of Health reported that the General Authority for Civil Affairs informed it of the martyrdom of citizen Shaker Falah Al-Ja'bari (58 years old) by occupation bullets in Hebron last night, and the detention of his body.

Occupation forces had injured Al-Ja'bari in the "Khallat Hadour" area east of Hebron, and prevented ambulance crews from reaching him, claiming he attempted to run over a group of soldiers.

In another context, the Israeli occupation army announced on Sunday morning that one of its soldiers was moderately wounded during clashes that took place in Nablus, north of the West Bank.

The army stated in a communiqué on its "X" platform account: "During a military operation by Israeli army forces in the city of Nablus, a soldier was moderately wounded as a result of gunfire directed at the forces." It added that "the injured soldier was transferred to the hospital for treatment, and his family was informed."

For its part, the "Nablus Battalion" affiliated with Saraya al-Quds said that its fighters discovered a special Israeli unit during its infiltration in the vicinity of the Old City, and "showered" it with intense bursts of bullets, achieving confirmed hits among its ranks.

Shortly before that, Israeli Army Radio reported clashes in the Qasaba neighborhood of Nablus between the Israeli army and Palestinian resistance fighters.

Later, the official "Wafa" agency reported that Israeli occupation forces were besieging the entrance to the Old City of Nablus, amid a widespread deployment within its alleys.

The Palestinian Red Crescent said that occupation forces were detaining a number of journalists in the Old City of Nablus, after they arrived to cover the developments.

Sources told the "Wafa" agency that special Israeli forces infiltrated the Al-Qaryoun neighborhood inside the Old City, followed by the storming of a number of occupation vehicles that entered the city from several axes, heading towards the Old City and its surroundings, and spread in several alleys inside the city, and the Eastern Market, and sounds of live gunfire were heard.

Over the past hours, occupation forces launched a wide arrest campaign in Nablus, Hebron, Ramallah, Qalqilya, and other areas in the West Bank.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 10:13 am - Jerusalem Time

Israeli Army: Soldier injured in clashes in Nablus, shooter pursued

The Israeli army said a soldier was moderately wounded during what it described as operational activity in the city of Nablus, in armed clashes between Palestinian resistance fighters and the occupation army.

The Israeli army added that it is pursuing the shooter of the soldier.

It had earlier reported the outbreak of armed clashes between resistance fighters and the occupation army after Israeli special units infiltrated the Old City of Nablus in the northern West Bank.

It clarified that military reinforcements had arrived in the vicinity of the Old City in Nablus.

In Ramallah, Fatima Khamayseh reported that "Israeli occupation forces are still continuing their operations in the city of Nablus in the northern West Bank and are continuing their search for the shooter, and are pushing military reinforcements to encircle it and arrest the shooter. There is an incursion into the Askar refugee camp east of Nablus amid talk of house raids, and clashes are heard from time to time."

She explained that what happened was "an incursion by elements of the Mista'arvim unit via two civilian trucks carrying Palestinian license plates that entered the Yasmineh neighborhood in the Old City of Nablus at dawn today, and after the youth of that area discovered these special units, they opened fire on them, which led to their retreat and a request for military reinforcements from the Israeli army."

She concluded that "occupation forces deployed snipers on the roofs of a number of buildings in the Old City simultaneously with the intensive military deployment, and gunfire is heard from time to time amid a complete siege of the area."

In a related context, the Israeli army said its forces opened fire on a Palestinian who tried to run over soldiers in the city of Hebron.

For its part, the Palestinian Red Crescent said that the occupation forces prevented its crews from reaching an injured young man in the Khallet Hadour area in central Hebron.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 10:01 am - Jerusalem Time

Prominent Republican Senator Calls for Immediate Cut to Military Aid to Israel After Netanyahu's Statements

In a notable development in American political discourse towards Israel, prominent Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, known for decades for his strong support of Israel, called for an immediate reduction in US military aid to Israel, without waiting ten years. This came in response to statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who announced that his country seeks to end its dependence on US military aid within a decade.

Graham stated in a post on the "X" platform (formerly Twitter) that the United States "does not need to wait ten years" to begin reducing aid, considering that accelerating this step could save American taxpayers billions of dollars, and these funds could be directed to enhance internal American military capabilities. Graham's statements are particularly significant given his long history as one of the most prominent advocates for military aid to Israel within Congress.

Netanyahu's Statements: Ending Dependence Within a Decade

Graham's statements came after an interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in The Economist magazine, where he said that Israel aims to "gradually reduce its dependence on US military aid to zero within the next ten years." Netanyahu explained that Israel now has a strong economy and an advanced defense industry that enables it to achieve greater military self-sufficiency.

Netanyahu indicated that his government is investing hundreds of billions of shekels in local military industries, including the development of air defense systems, precision missiles, and cyber technologies, considering that these investments will allow Israel to maintain its qualitative military edge without the need for continuous external support.

US Aid: History and Volume

Under the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2016, Israel receives US military aid worth approximately $38 billion extending until 2028, averaging $3.8 billion annually. This aid is a cornerstone of the strategic relationship between the two countries, allowing Israel to purchase advanced weapons from the United States, and also strengthening American defense industries themselves.

For decades, this aid has enjoyed near-unanimous support from both Republican and Democratic parties, being considered part of Washington's commitment to Israel's security in a turbulent region. However, Netanyahu's recent statements have opened the door to rethinking the future of this support.

A study organized by the prestigious "Brown" University, published last fall, showed that the United States has directly supported Israel with at least more than $22 billion in weapons since October 7, 2023.

Reactions Within the Republican Party

Graham's stance sparked controversy within Republican circles, as some observers saw his statement as reflecting a broader shift within the party, especially among fiscally conservative currents that have become more skeptical of the utility of foreign spending. These observers believe that the United States faces major internal challenges, from budget deficits to modernizing its military infrastructure, which necessitates a reordering of priorities.

In contrast, a large number of Republicans still consider aid to Israel a strategic investment that serves American interests in the Middle East and maintains the military superiority of a key ally in the face of regional adversaries.

Democratic Positions and the Broader Context

On the Democratic side, positions vary. While the centrist current adheres to supporting military aid to Israel, a growing progressive wing calls for linking this aid to conditions related to human rights and the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territories. Nevertheless, Graham's call represents a notable precedent, as it comes from a Republican figure whose name has long been associated with unconditional defense of Israel.

Potential Repercussions

So far, there is no official legislative initiative to cut military aid to Israel, but Graham's statements may pave the way for a broader discussion within Congress, especially with the approaching end of the current Memorandum of Understanding in 2028. These statements may also affect the calculations of decision-makers in Israel regarding the pace of reducing dependence on American support.

Lindsey Graham's statements reflect a qualitative shift in American political discourse, as military support for Israel is no longer an unquestionable given within the Republican Party. The call for an immediate reduction in aid, even if presented in economic terms, indicates that the relationship is now measured by the logic of cost and return, not just by traditional ideological or strategic alliances.

On the other hand, Netanyahu's statements reveal a preemptive Israeli attempt to redefine the relationship with Washington on the basis of partnership, not dependence. However, ending aid may carry political and military risks, as this aid is not limited to money only, but also represents a political guarantee and a symbol of American commitment to Israel's security in the face of rapid regional transformations.

OPINIONS

Sun 11 Jan 2026 9:46 am - Jerusalem Time

Timeline and Follow-up on the Genocide Case at the ICJ

Dr. Dalal Saeb Erakat

Dr. Dalal Saeb Erakat

Opinion Writer

The lawsuit filed by South Africa before the International Court of Justice constituted a landmark legal moment, not only because of the gravity of the accusation, but because it reactivated one of the most sensitive international agreements: the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. However, the gravity of this moment lies not only in the issuance of the decision, but in what followed, and we ask two years later: have the Court's orders been left without follow-up, or have they turned into a continuous accountability process? What happened and how do we build on it, and who is responsible?
Phase One: On December 29, 2023, South Africa formally filed its lawsuit before the Court, based on Article IX of the Genocide Convention, which allows any state party to sue another state for breaching the Convention, even if not directly harmed. With this action, the Palestinian issue moved for the first time in decades to the heart of international jurisdiction.
Phase Two: The Court held public hearings on January 11 and 12, 2024, to consider the request for provisional measures. At this stage, the Court was not asked to prove that the crime had occurred, but to assess the existence of a reasonable risk threatening the rights protected under the Convention, and the seriousness of the continued actions subject to the lawsuit. This point was deliberately misunderstood in political and media discourse, as it was portrayed as a “formal stage,” while in reality it is the basis for urgent judicial intervention.
Phase Three: On January 26, 2024, the Court issued its order for provisional measures, and decided that the rights South Africa sought to protect were “plausible and at real risk.” The Court obligated Israel to: take all measures to prevent acts that could constitute genocide, ensure the entry of humanitarian aid and essential services, prevent public and direct incitement to genocide, and submit an official report within one month on compliance procedures. Legally, this decision is binding and not subject to political or selective interpretation.
Phase Four: Since February 2024, indicators of Israeli non-compliance have begun to accumulate through restrictions on aid, the continued expansion of military operations, and the escalation of incitement without accountability. Faced with this reality, many countries joined the case and South Africa returned to the Court, requesting additional measures, especially with the worsening situation in Rafah. New hearings were held on May 16 and 17, 2024, confirming that the case has not been closed, and that the Court retains its jurisdiction as long as the danger persists.
In this timeline, responsibility cannot be limited to the plaintiff state, the Court, or the states that joined the case alone. As a state party to the Genocide Convention, the State of Palestine bears a direct legal obligation to follow up on the implementation of the Court's orders. This means that Palestine's role should not be limited to welcoming decisions, but should include: systematically documenting non-compliance, raising it through legal and diplomatic channels, and explicitly demanding international measures to ensure implementation.
Contentment with a political stance empties international recognition of Palestine of its legal content. For signatory states and recognizing states: a double commitment. More than 150 states have ratified the Genocide Convention. Under it, the obligation is not limited to refraining from committing the crime, but includes preventing it and prosecuting its violation. States that have recognized the State of Palestine bear a double responsibility because they are now called upon to protect it legally. Recognition that is not translated into diplomatic pressure, a review of relations, or public defense of the binding nature of the Court's decisions, turns into a symbolic, ineffective measure.
Justice is a process; the International Court of Justice has not yet issued its final judgment, and that may take years. But the timeline of the case clarifies one fact: international law does not work automatically, but needs states that insist on activating it. The State of Palestine must lead the follow-up process, not merely play the role of a victim. And signatory states, especially those recognizing Palestine, must prove that recognition is a commitment, not a slogan. In this case, dropping the follow-up is dropping accountability, and dropping accountability is undermining rights and the meaning of international justice, and a sign of Israel's continued impunity for daily crimes, which is the main reason for the occupying state's disrespect for any laws or UN resolutions, because it always escapes punishment to the point where it deals with the international system with unprecedented contempt.


OPINIONS

Sun 11 Jan 2026 9:40 am - Jerusalem Time

Between the Statement of Constants and the Imperative of Reform: What Does Fatah Want from its Eighth Conference?

By: Dr. Yasser Abu Bakr

By: Dr. Yasser Abu Bakr

Opinion Writer

The final statement of the thirteenth session of the Fatah Revolutionary Council is not a fleeting statement, nor can it be read outside the dangerous national context in which the Palestinian cause lives amidst a war of extermination, targeting of identity, and attempts to dismantle national representation. From this angle, the statement was politically disciplined, clear in establishing constants, keen on unity of discourse, and cohesive in defending the Palestinian national project in the face of displacement, settlement, guardianship, and suspicious alternatives. This in itself is a credit to the movement at a national moment that cannot tolerate dispersion or adventure.
However, reading the statement from the perspective of a Fatah cadre keen on the movement does not suffice with what it said, but rather pauses for a long time at what it avoided saying, what it postponed, and what it left open to interpretation, especially since the statement was issued at a sensitive organizational moment preceding the Eighth General Conference, whose date was clearly announced, while its path and criteria remained vague.
Politically, it cannot be denied that the statement re-established the correct national ceiling: rejection of displacement, adherence to the PLO as the sole legitimate representative, unity of Palestinian land, priority of stopping the aggression on Gaza, supporting the steadfastness of the camps in the northern West Bank, the centrality of Jerusalem, and defending UNRWA and the right of return. These are not details, but major headlines that reflect Fatah's position at the heart of national consensus, and confirm that the movement is still capable of producing a balanced political discourse in the most complex moments.
The statement is also credited with not ignoring the sensitive issues that have burdened the relationship between the movement and its bases in recent years. It clearly affirmed that the rights and dignity of the families of martyrs, prisoners, and wounded are a trust on the movement's neck, and acknowledged the existence of "confusion" in this file, with a pledge to find an appropriate national formula to address it quickly. It also re-emphasized the centrality of the prisoners' file, and rejected the racist occupation legislation against them.
These are important moral and political signals, but they remain incomplete as long as they have not been translated into clear executive commitments, with specific mechanisms and an announced timetable, to dispel the legitimate concern of the families of martyrs and prisoners, and restore lost trust.
Organizationally, the decision to hold a session of the Revolutionary Council before the General Conference to approve the work of the preparatory committee was a positive step in principle, because it strengthens the role of the Revolutionary Council and gives it a supervisory function. Also, the decision to return those against whom individual dismissal decisions were issued, with the exception of those who committed crimes against our people or whose cases are still pending, represents a step towards long-awaited internal repair, and restores consideration to the idea that the movement is not managed by individual exclusion or whimsical decisions.
However, these steps, despite their importance, remain incomplete if they are not included within a broader reform vision. The statement did not provide a diagnosis of the state of organizational stagnation, did not explicitly acknowledge the decline in the movement's popular presence, and did not address the accumulated trust gap between the bases and the leadership. More dangerously, it avoided delving into the essence of the organizational question that occupies Fatah cadres today: What kind of conference do we want? And how do we ensure that the Eighth Conference is a real renewal station and not a reproduction of the same reality?
Announcing the date of the conference without talking about its membership criteria, or representation mechanisms, or guarantees that prevent non-organizational interventions, does not dispel concern, but rather postpones it. The problem in the movement's history has never been in holding conferences, but in the way to them, and in how their structure and outcomes are formulated. Therefore, merely affirming "the necessity of the conference" without reassuring the bases of the integrity of its path leaves the door open to doubts, and weakens the ability to transform the conference into a moment of real revival.
The statement, in this sense, is strong in politics, but overly cautious in organization. This caution is tactically understandable in a pressing national circumstance, but it should not become a permanent approach. Fatah, if it wants to lead the street, it is not enough to address it with an advanced national discourse, but it must address its cadres with a sincere reformist language that acknowledges the crisis and sets a clear program to address it.
What is required today, after this statement, is not another statement, but a complementary organizational action. What is required are clear decisions before the conference regarding its membership criteria, guaranteeing the independence of the preparatory committee, the complete separation between the organization and any external interventions, and a real and transparent treatment of the file of the families of martyrs and prisoners. What is also required is to link the talk about "the year of Palestinian democracy" with democracy within the movement itself, because one who lacks something cannot give it, and because any call for participation and alignment loses its meaning if it is not accompanied by internal reform that opens the door for the cadre, not just demands their commitment.
This statement is a step forward politically, but it is still an incomplete step organizationally. If it is not completed with tangible reform steps before the Eighth Conference, the movement risks widening the trust gap, not bridging it. Fatah still possesses historical capital, national legitimacy, and the ability to lead, but these elements are not preserved by statements alone, but by a courageous will for reform that begins from within.
Between the statement of constants and the imperative of reform, Fatah stands today before a real test. Either it transforms the Eighth Conference into a station of renewal and responsibility, or it contents itself with managing the moment and postponing difficult questions. The difference between the two options is not determined by the statement, but by the actions that will follow it.

PALESTINE

Sun 11 Jan 2026 8:20 am - Jerusalem Time

Israeli Air Force launches raids on Gaza after martyrdom of Palestinians

The Israeli Air Force launched raids this Sunday morning on various sites in the areas where the occupation army is deployed in the Gaza Strip, after Palestinians were martyred and others injured by its fire yesterday, Saturday.

Israeli raids targeted areas where the occupation army is deployed east of Rafah and Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, and the Bureij refugee camp in its center.

Yesterday, Saturday, the Israeli army admitted to killing 3 Palestinians in various areas of the Gaza Strip, claiming that they posed an immediate threat to the forces deployed in the field.

In a statement, it claimed that the forces of the 188th Brigade's combat team, operating in the southern Gaza Strip, detected on Saturday, 3 armed Palestinians who crossed what is called the "Yellow Line" and approached the forces, claiming that one of them tried to take military equipment from the army before fleeing the scene.

The statement added that the Israeli Air Force carried out a raid under the guidance of the brigade's fire system, which resulted in the killing of what it described as the "armed man" west of the Yellow Line.

In the northern part of the Strip, the army claimed in the same statement that it detected a number of "armed men" who crossed the Yellow Line and approached the forces, which was considered an immediate threat, according to its expression.

It indicated that the forces opened fire immediately upon detecting them, which led to the killing of two of the "armed men."

Also on Saturday, Palestinian medical sources said that the Israeli army killed two Palestinians and injured several others, in targeting operations carried out in various parts of the Gaza Strip.

The sources confirmed that a number of Palestinians were injured in an airstrike carried out by an Israeli aircraft near the entrance to the Maghazi refugee camp, in the center of the Strip.

Eyewitnesses said that all the areas targeted by the Israeli army had been withdrawn from under the ceasefire agreement.

This came as part of the continuous Israeli violations of the ceasefire agreement in effect since October 10, 2025.

The Israeli army also launched airstrikes and artillery shelling on various parts of the Strip at dawn on Saturday, within the areas under its control according to the ceasefire agreement.

Since the agreement came into effect, Israel has committed hundreds of violations with shelling and gunfire, resulting in the martyrdom of 439 Palestinians and the injury of 1223 others.

ARAB AND WORLD

Sun 11 Jan 2026 8:11 am - Jerusalem Time

The occupation confirms no intention to attack Iran but is preparing for any surprise

The source denied any intention of the occupation to launch a military attack on Iran at this stage.

The Hebrew "Channel 12" quoted an official source as saying that the Chief of Staff of the occupation army held intensive security consultations over the weekend to assess the situation in Iran.

The source confirmed that all security establishment agencies are closely monitoring the latest field developments and escalating protests inside Iran, to detect any repercussions that may affect the regional front.

Denial of attack intention and preparation for surprises

In a message aimed at clarifying the official position, the source denied any intention of the occupation to launch a military attack on Iran at this stage.

However, he stressed that the Israeli occupation army is fully prepared to defend and confront any "surprise" that may result from the export of the Iranian crisis abroad, or an unforeseen security slip.

Military analysts in Tel Aviv believe that these consultations reflect the occupation's fears of "the regime's recklessness" in Tehran as a means to escape internal pressures, which necessitates raising the level of alert in air defense and intelligence systems.

Read also: Palestinian youth injured by occupation bullets on suspicion of attempted "ramming" in Hebron

The occupation remains in a state of permanent session to monitor the repercussions of "digital isolation" and bloody clashes in Iranian cities, while maintaining a policy of "waiting and readiness."

ARAB AND WORLD

Sun 11 Jan 2026 7:19 am - Jerusalem Time

Somali Defense Minister: Israel plans to forcibly displace Palestinians to Somaliland

Somali Defense Minister Ahmed Moallim Fiqi said that Mogadishu has information that Israel plans to forcibly displace Palestinians to what is known as the "Somaliland" region, describing the move as a grave violation of international law and Somalia's sovereignty.

Fiqi called on the Israeli government to withdraw its recognition of what he called the "separatist region," stressing that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no legal or legitimate right to grant legitimacy to an entity within a sovereign state.

The minister explained, during an interview with the "Al-Masa'iya" program, that the Israeli move represents a direct aggression against the territorial integrity of Somalia, noting that Israel is exploiting separatist leaders, even though nearly half of the areas that were known as "Somaliland" have announced their joining the Federal Republic of Somalia in the past two years.

Fiqi revealed that Israel also seeks to establish a military base in the region due to its strategic location near the Bab al-Mandab Strait, the Red Sea, and the Arabian Sea, warning that this aims to destabilize and divide countries.

He affirmed that his country will resort to all diplomatic and legal means to reject what he described as the Israeli violation, pointing out that the African Union realizes the seriousness of this precedent for the stability of the continent.

The minister praised the positions of a number of Arab and regional countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, in addition to the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council, in supporting Somalia's unity. He also appreciated the position of US President Donald Trump's administration in not recognizing the so-called "Somaliland" region.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 9:23 pm - Jerusalem Time

Hamas leader: The movement affirmed its readiness to hand over its duties in the Gaza Strip to a "technocrat" committee

Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem announced on Saturday evening a clear decision taken by the movement to dissolve the governmental bodies currently managing affairs in the Gaza Strip, should an agreed-upon technocrat committee be formed.

Qassem affirmed in a press statement that the movement is ready to hand over all duties to a "technocrat" committee, stressing Hamas's commitment to facilitating all procedures to ensure the committee's success in performing its tasks. He also called for accelerating the formation of this body to begin its responsibilities towards the Strip.

This announcement coincided with statements by the movement's leader, Basem Naim, in which he affirmed that the ceasefire plan proposed by US President Donald Trump, and adopted by the Security Council in Resolution 2803, is facing clear difficulties.

Naim attributed this difficulty to what he described as the evasion of his commitments by the occupation's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of working to escalate the situation and sabotage the agreement to return to war in search of saving his political future.

Naim highlighted the continuous violations by the occupation, pointing to the martyrdom of 13 Palestinians yesterday, Friday, in various areas under what he described as fabricated pretexts. He reiterated the following points:

Read also: Sisi and "Class" call for full implementation of the Gaza agreement and anticipation for Washington's announcement of the features of the second phase

Resistance's Commitment: He affirmed that the resistance has committed to all its obligations according to the agreement, as testified by mediators and the United States. Readiness for the Second Phase: He stressed the movement's readiness to deal positively with the second phase, including the immediate formation of a Palestinian body to administer Gaza and Hamas's withdrawal from the governmental scene. Basic Demands: He linked the success of the plan to the full opening of crossings in both directions and the implementation of the remaining clauses clarified to the mediators. Leader Basem Naim warned that the continued escalation and the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza put the credibility of the mediators and the American guarantor at stake.

He concluded by emphasizing that this situation is unsustainable and could lead to an expansion of the conflict in the region, which Netanyahu appears to be seeking to avoid his inevitable political fate.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 7:09 pm - Jerusalem Time

Anonymous text messages terrorize settlers: 'We are coming, look at the sky at midnight'

Despite the confusion it caused, the army, Shin Bet, and police did not issue any statements warning of a real security threat.

The past few hours have witnessed a state of tension and anxiety among settlers in the occupation entity, after a large number of them received anonymous short text messages (SMS) on their mobile phones.

Channel 12 reported that the messages were in English with a threatening tone: "We are coming, look at the sky at midnight," which led to widespread circulation and noticeable confusion amid the charged security atmosphere in the region.

A military source confirmed to the occupation army radio (Gal Tzahal) that many people received these reports, as it became clear that the messages were sent via foreign numbers or low-cost bulk broadcasting services.

Read also: "Kidnapping the groom".. A wedding night in occupied Jerusalem turns into a field of repression with occupation bullets.. Video

Despite the confusion it caused, the army, Shin Bet, and police did not issue any statements warning of a real, tangible security threat based on these texts, which reinforces the hypothesis of "psychological warfare."

Security experts so far tend to classify this campaign as a "mass intimidation operation" or a "digital hoax" exploiting the current tension, rather than an indicator of an imminent military operation.

Despite speculations linking these movements to entities supporting Iran, these analyses remain without conclusive evidence and fall within the framework of initial conclusions about the situation.

Most analyses agree that the campaign succeeded digitally in creating a stir, but it remains within the scope of "cheap terror" that is not based on significant technical or operational capabilities, with calls for the public to exercise caution when dealing with such misleading messages.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 5:08 pm - Jerusalem Time

Sisi and "Kallas" call for full implementation of Gaza agreement and anticipation of Washington's announcement of the features of the second phase

These arrangements aim to provide basic services to citizens and initiate early recovery projects, which are a prelude to comprehensive reconstruction.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, during his meeting with the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, stressed the necessity of full implementation of the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip.

This meeting coincided with reports indicating the imminent transition to the second phase of the agreement, amid Egyptian assurances that the United States will soon announce the entitlements associated with this phase, which is led by the vision of US President Donald Trump.

The Egyptian and European sides affirmed a set of crucial constants to ensure the sustainability of de-escalation in the Strip. Emphasis was placed on ensuring the regular and unrestricted flow of humanitarian aid, with an absolute rejection of any attempts to displace Palestinians from their lands.

President Sisi and Kallas also reiterated their call for accelerating the start of the second phase and launching the reconstruction process, in conjunction with resuming the political track to achieve a just and comprehensive peace based on the two-state solution.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdel Atty clarified that the plan associated with President "Trump" includes essential details that will be announced soon by Washington.

The critical importance of this phase lies in the security and service umbrella it will provide, including the deployment of an international stabilization force and the empowerment of the Palestinian Administrative Committee on the ground.

These arrangements aim to provide basic services to citizens and initiate early recovery projects, which are a prelude to comprehensive reconstruction.

The meeting was not limited to the Palestinian issue, as Sisi and Kallas discussed a range of pressing issues affecting global security.

Discussions included the situations in Libya, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran, leading up to the Ukrainian crisis.

The two sides agreed on the inevitability of settling these conflicts through peaceful means to preserve the unity and integrity of states, warning that any additional military escalation would have dire consequences affecting the interests of all parties without exception.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 4:49 pm - Jerusalem Time

US media: Conditions for disarmament by "Israel" may reignite clashes with Hamas

An official in the occupation army affirmed that disarming the movement is inevitable, and if it is not done voluntarily, "it will be forced."

The American newspaper "Wall Street Journal" revealed field preparations by both the occupation forces and the Hamas movement for the possibility of renewed military confrontations between them.

This tension comes amid the movement's insistence on not fully disarming, a condition that "America" and the occupation adhere to as a fundamental pillar for any progress in the anticipated political path.

"America" and the occupation demand that Hamas relinquish its weapons as part of its commitment to a ceasefire agreement.

While the movement shows readiness to abandon what remains of "heavy weapons," it categorically refuses to surrender light weapons, as occupation reports estimate that Hamas has about 60,000 rifles and 20,000 fighters.

On the other hand, the movement is focusing on restoring its damaged military capabilities, especially the tunnel network. The newspaper also quoted Arab and Israeli officials as saying that Hamas received new financial flows that enabled it to resume paying its fighters regularly.

In the context of these movements, the occupation army has prepared plans for a new ground operation targeting areas controlled by Hamas.

The Chief of Staff of the occupation army, Eyal Zamir, stated last November the necessity of preparing for a "wide attack" behind the lines of engagement.

Despite these plans, officials confirm that there is no immediate intention for field entry, as Tel Aviv is giving time for the American plan to proceed, while emphasizing that the timing of the operation remains in the hands of the political leadership.

For his part, "Trump" had issued a stern warning to the movement in December, threatening that "hell" would break out if it did not give up its weapons.

An official in the occupation army affirmed that disarming the movement is inevitable, and if it is not done voluntarily, "it will be forced."

The readiness is not limited to the Gaza Strip; the occupation forces are also considering the possibility of a new round with Hezbollah, believing that a new operation may be necessary to help the Lebanese army disarm the party, while the latter asserts its ability to do so alone.

Tel Aviv is also closely monitoring Tehran's efforts to rebuild its ballistic missile program after the June war, with warnings of strikes to prevent this.

Donald "Trump" reiterated his support for any military action against Tehran if it rebuilds its missile or nuclear programs.

The intersection of disarmament demands with Hamas's insistence on retaining its capabilities gives the coming period a critical character, as strict American warnings and field movements indicate that the option of war remains strongly present if diplomacy falters.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 3:40 pm - Jerusalem Time

Netanyahu and the Inverted Propaganda: When Genocide is Justified and the World is Accused

Washington - Said Arikat


Political Analysis

In a historical moment where blood intertwines with politics, and destruction with propaganda, Benjamin Netanyahu appeared in an extended interview with "The Economist" magazine, published on Friday, January 9, attempting to re-market himself and his leadership, not only to Israelis ahead of new general elections, but to a world that now views Israel as a morally ostracized state rather than a "besieged democracy," as he insists on calling it.

Netanyahu, who is preparing to run in elections for the twelfth time and aspires to solidify his record as the longest-serving prime minister in Israel's history, appeared in the interview captive to a single narrative that he repeats with remarkable persistence: that Israel's international isolation is not the result of a war of extermination in Gaza, nor the outcome of military occupation and racist settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem, but rather the result of a "propaganda war" and "slander" led by hostile forces, driven – according to his logic – by an ancient hatred of Jews.

This discourse, which reduces an unprecedented human tragedy to a public relations issue, reveals a deep disconnect from reality. The world has not witnessed "propaganda," but rather cities wiped off the map, hospitals bombed, and children pulled from under rubble. More than seventy thousand dead in Gaza are not a hypothetical narrative or the product of electronic "Bots," but a documented reality reported by international press cameras, United Nations organizations, and relief teams.

Nevertheless, Netanyahu insists that Israel is fighting an unequal battle in the "war of consciousness," using ironic analogies when he says that his country is fighting "with knights against F-35 aircraft" in the media arena. This description does not express media injustice, but rather a moral crisis: the state that possesses one of the most powerful armies in the world, and extensive Western political and military support, assumes the role of a victim because it has failed to justify the killing of civilians.

More dangerously, Netanyahu repeatedly resorts to the "anti-Semitism" card whenever his arguments run thin. In the interview, he reproduced a historical narrative about the persecution of Jews in Central Europe, concluding that the criticisms directed at Israel today are merely an extension of that hatred. This deliberate conflation of Jews as a religious or cultural group with a state that practices occupation and military force not only distorts the truth but also harms the victims of anti-Semitism themselves, when their suffering is exploited to justify contemporary crimes.

Global criticism of Israel today is not based on religious hatred, but on political and legal facts: a long-term occupation, a systematic discriminatory regime, illegal settlement expansion, and a war that has destroyed an entire sector. Turning this criticism into "incitement against Jews" is not a defense, but an evasion of accountability.

Netanyahu also complains about what he calls "impossible standards" imposed on Israel, invoking Winston Churchill and World War II. But this comparison ignores a fundamental truth: Gaza is not a battlefield between equal armies, but a besieged area where more than two million people live without protection. The comparison here is not only wrong but scandalous in its disregard for civilian lives.

Netanyahu believes that a ceasefire will alleviate international pressure, because "media focus will fade." This gamble reflects his firm conviction that global memory is short, and that crimes expire with media obsolescence. But he ignores that what happened in Gaza is no longer just a news event, but has become a symbol of the collapse of the moral system that Israel has long claimed to belong to.

In another context, Netanyahu tries to appear capable of resetting the relationship with the United States, even if it requires reducing American military aid in the future. However, this proposal seems closer to an electoral maneuver than a real strategic shift, especially given the increasing criticism within American public opinion itself of Israel's policies, including within the base that was traditionally considered supportive of it.

As for his talk about Israel "defending Western civilization" in the face of "savage" forces, it is a continuation of an old orientalist discourse, re-dividing the world into a civilized camp and a savage one, and giving Israel an open certificate of innocence no matter what it commits. This discourse loses what remains of its credibility when compared to images of hunger, destruction, and mass graves in Gaza.

The contradiction becomes sharper when Netanyahu shifts from addressing the West to the Israeli interior. Settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank has reached unprecedented levels during his terms in office, and settler violence has escalated under army protection, while ministers in his government openly speak of annexation. Nevertheless, Netanyahu downplays the importance of the Palestinian issue, claiming that Arab leaders "do not care" about it, a reading that reflects contempt for Arab public opinion and the political reality in the region.

The failure of October 7, 2023, remains a black mark haunting Netanyahu. The man who does not hesitate to attribute successes to himself refuses to bear political responsibility for the biggest security failure in Israel's history. He talks about postponed investigation committees, and distributes blame to agencies and institutions, but he avoids one word: responsibility.

In conclusion, Netanyahu's interview with "The Economist" reveals not a rescue plan for Israel, but a crisis of a leader who refuses to acknowledge that the isolation his state faces is not the result of propaganda, conspiracy, or religious hatred, but a natural consequence of policies of violence, occupation, and extermination. Today's world is no longer content with narratives, but judges actions, and Netanyahu, no matter how loud he raises his voice, is now unable to escape this judgment.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 3:36 pm - Jerusalem Time

Three dead and wounded in occupation shelling on Gaza Strip

Three Palestinians were martyred and others were injured on Saturday in occupation shelling that targeted areas in the Gaza Strip, as part of a long series of ceasefire violations.

Medical sources reported the martyrdom of one Palestinian and the injury of another in a drone strike by the occupation near the Bani Suheila roundabout, in the center of Khan Yunis city. They also confirmed that two martyrs fell as a result of being shot by occupation vehicles east of the Zeitoun neighborhood.

The sources indicated that a number of citizens were injured in the occupation's shelling of the entrance to the Maghazi camp in the central Strip, while it continued

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 3:32 pm - Jerusalem Time

Infant dies due to extreme cold in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip

An infant, not more than 7 days old, died in the city of Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, on Saturday, due to the extreme cold, according to hospitals in the Strip, in a new tragedy that reveals the extent of the escalating humanitarian suffering.

Heavy rains that fell during the past hours caused the flooding of a large number of displaced persons' tents in various areas of the Gaza Strip, especially in low-lying areas; which exacerbated the suffering of thousands of families living in extremely difficult humanitarian conditions, amidst harsh weather conditions and the continued repercussions of the aggression, according to medical sources.

The Director-General of the Ministry of Health in Gaza, Munir al-Barsh, had previously warned of the increased risk of death for children, the elderly, and the sick; as a result of the sharp drop in temperatures inside the displaced persons' tents that were submerged by rainwater.

Al-Barsh explained that humidity and water leakage into the tents create a suitable environment for the spread of respiratory diseases among the displaced, at a time when patients are unable to obtain the necessary healthcare, due to the deteriorating humanitarian conditions and the lack of resources in the Strip.

PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 11:10 am - Jerusalem Time

Occupation raids and artillery shelling on Gaza despite ceasefire agreement

On Saturday, occupation forces launched airstrikes and artillery shelling on various areas of the Gaza Strip, including areas within their control according to the ceasefire agreement.

This comes as part of the continuous violations by the occupation of the agreement, which came into effect on October 10, 2025.

Palestinian sources reported that the occupation artillery shelled the eastern areas of Gaza City, located within the areas of control according to the agreement.

The sources added that occupation warplanes launched an airstrike on a target in the northern Strip, coinciding with a helicopter firing towards the eastern areas of Jabalia town in northern Gaza.

In the southern Strip, occupation aircraft targeted the city of Rafah with an airstrike, coinciding with occupation vehicles firing north of the city, which is completely under its control.

Since the ceasefire agreement came into effect, the occupation has committed hundreds of violations through shelling and firing; which has resulted, since last October 11, in the martyrdom of 439 Palestinians and the injury of 1223 others.

The agreement had ended a genocide war launched by the occupation on October 8, 2023, and lasted for two years, resulting in the martyrdom of more than 71,000 Palestinians and the injury of about 171,000 others, most of whom were children and women, in addition to widespread destruction that affected about 90% of the civilian infrastructure in the Strip.

OPINIONS

Sat 10 Jan 2026 10:58 am - Jerusalem Time

Revisiting Oslo: Between Challenges and Strategies in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

Dr. Ibrahim Na'irat

Dr. Ibrahim Na'irat

Opinion Writer

At a time when hardly a day passes without hearing Palestinian, Arab, and even international voices criticizing the Oslo Accords, there remains another aspect that we must shed light on, an aspect often not brought up in daily discussions about the failure or success of these agreements. While some believe that Oslo was a disaster for the Palestinians, the truth reveals that these agreements were more than just a step towards peace; they were, in fact, a strategic step in favor of the Palestinians, which is indirectly reflected in the strong opposition of the Israeli right-wing to them. If we look closely at the reason for this Israeli attack, we will discover that Israel was well aware that Oslo was a threat to its existence more than ever before.

Since the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israeli reactions, especially from the right-wing, have been angry and sharp. There was a recurring statement from right-wing leaders saying that Oslo was a "betrayal" or a "strategic mistake." Although some critics in the Arab and Palestinian world believed that the Palestinians did not get what they deserved in those agreements, the Israeli hostility to Oslo should draw our attention to something deeper. The Israeli right-wing's opposition to Oslo was not due to the weakness of the agreement or Israel losing its interests, but rather due to a strong conviction that this agreement could pose a direct threat to Israel's future, and meant a gradual erosion of Israeli hegemony over the land. The Israeli right-wing feared that Palestinian recognition of Israel and the move towards a two-state solution might pave the way for the reduction of settlements and the return of Palestinian rights, and this constituted a real political nightmare for them.

But Oslo was not only a message from the Palestinians to Israel, but also a strong message to the whole world. A message of the Palestinians' understanding of the dimensions of global and regional power balances at that time, and a message that they are aware of the concepts of strength and weakness in the international arena, and that they seek peace and good neighborliness peacefully. In a reality where the Israeli occupation imposed a harsh reality on the Palestinians, Oslo was a step towards reaching a just settlement that recognizes Palestinian rights, but at the same time, it was a call to the world to pay attention to the Palestinian issue as a legitimate issue that needs a political solution that recognizes the demands and aspirations of the Palestinian people.

Although Oslo was an important strategic step, both Palestinians and Israelis did not manage these agreements as they should have. Some elements of Oslo, whether in their drafting or implementation, were missed or obstructed by internal parties on both sides, leading to a series of failures that significantly affected the outcomes of these agreements. While Oslo opened the doors for dialogue and understanding, effective implementation mechanisms were absent, and the concerned parties did not manage the agreement's outcomes in a way that ensured its progress in the hoped-for direction. There was a clear problem in the non-implementation of the commitments of both parties, especially regarding the cessation of Israeli settlement in the occupied territories, as well as the failure to address key issues such as Jerusalem and refugees. On the Palestinian side, internal divisions among factions represented a major obstacle, while the Israeli side suffered from the absence of political will among some of its leaders to fully implement what had been agreed upon.

Over time, Oslo turned into an incomplete agreement, and the result was that the conflict continued to rage, and its complexities even increased. The foundations upon which the agreement was built were not fully respected by both parties, leading to an accumulation of frustrations on both sides. Palestinians felt that what they got from Oslo was not enough, while Israelis felt that the concessions they made did not translate into positive political results. Oslo was supposed to open the way towards a two-state solution, but over time, many obstacles emerged that made this goal seem distant.

But most importantly, it was the extremist forces on both sides, whether in Israel or Palestine, that emptied Oslo of its political content and threatened to destroy any chance for peace. On the Palestinian side, there were radical resistance movements that refused to recognize Israel in any way, and even considered any agreement with Israel a betrayal of the Palestinian cause. In contrast, on the Israeli side, there was a strong current of the extreme right that believed that any concession to the Palestinians was an existential threat to Israel. These extremists were fighting an ideological battle in an "either us or them" struggle, a vision that transformed the Palestinian-Israeli conflict from a mere political dispute into a state of mutual nihilism. Over time, extremists on both sides used their utmost tools to undermine Oslo, trying to destroy any chance for peace. These used political and military violence in an attempt to undermine the peace process and impose reality by force.

This escalatory trend culminated in many wars and military operations, most notably the Gaza War, which crowned these efforts. Military escalation, whether by Palestinian groups or by the Israeli army, reflected a determination to maintain the stalemate or continue the escalation, instead of seeking a lasting settlement. Thus, the extremist forces on both sides had succeeded in transforming Oslo from an opportunity for peace into a series of failures that not only hindered peace but led to further destruction and suffering.

Over time, Palestinians, despite all challenges, began to build demographic and political power within the occupied territories, which today has become one of the main factors in the balance of power between the two sides. After the signing of Oslo, Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip became more capable of influencing political equations in the region. Although this power did not fully achieve the dream of a Palestinian state, this is the beginning of the path towards Palestinian self-assertion in the international arena. But at the same time, extremist forces on both sides of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict are increasing their influence on daily politics. Those who reject any kind of settlement continue to fight for the continuation of the conflict, while the vast majority of Palestinians and Israelis seek compromises that can put an end to this ongoing conflict. In light of this, it is important to understand that Oslo, despite the concessions it entailed, was a step towards creating the conditions that could lead to fundamental transformations in a conflict that has lasted for decades, especially since it meant imposing Palestinians at the negotiating table as a political party, which was one of the greater goals of the Palestinian revolution.

In the end, Oslo remains a strategic turning point in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, where some forces failed to recognize its historical benefits in securing a place for Palestinians on the international stage. And when we understand the motives of extremists in fighting Oslo, we can clearly see that these agreements were not just a weak endeavor, but a mature step towards achieving political balance and Palestinian existence in the face of Israeli hegemonic forces.

 

OPINIONS

Sat 10 Jan 2026 10:45 am - Jerusalem Time

My friend... taught Maduro

Jihad Harb

Jihad Harb

Opinion Writer

My friend, who usually dislikes phone calls or social media conversations, called me, uncharacteristically angry about the kidnapping of Venezuelan President "Nicolas Maduro" by American military forces in a swift operation "that didn't last an hour." I told him, "Hold on, my friend; the United States has immense military and intelligence power, capable of reaching anyone, whenever and wherever it wants. Its forces are stationed in the ocean waters near the country, and its intelligence eyes and hands have been in the heart of the capital, "Caracas," for years." My friend's voice rose in anger, as if my answer had provoked him, saying, "This operation doesn't rely on the United States' power and weapons; it's betrayal, my friend." I said in a calm voice, or rather, I was careful to be calm, "It's illogical for it to be betrayal; the regime is behind him, the masses were surrounding him days ago, he has been at the head of power for many years, and he formed the government, bringing close those he trusted and distancing those he didn't trust among professionals. He has security forces in every neighborhood, if not every house, throughout Venezuela." My friend said, "Betrayal only comes from 'trusted people'; they are unprofessional, and their interests are above the country's interests, and their personal survival is more important than the survival of the leader or the country and its people. So, my friend, we haven't seen any serious movement from the Venezuelan government as a serious reaction to the kidnapping, and the armed forces haven't moved to defend the president, even though they are already on high alert due to continuous threats over recent months. It's illogical for helicopters to enter the capital without a reaction that hinders their operation, as if a planned matter had been orchestrated by all corners of his government." I told him, "Things are still unclear and shrouded in mystery, and judgments cannot be made. In my opinion, days will reveal the hidden truths, whether it's a conspiracy, or an understanding between the Venezuelan president and the American administration to get out of the escalating crisis to avoid a war that would devastate what remains of the country's resources, or sacrificing him for the sake of the regime's survival and the country's safety, or weak military capabilities, are behind this matter." My friend continued, saying - meanwhile, my friend's breath calmed, and his voice became less sharp, and he regained a tone of wisdom to build a rational conclusion, it seemed - "Maduro's lesson, regardless of the kidnapping operation and the colonial intentions of the American administration and its dominance over the western hemisphere and the theft of the resources of the peoples in Latin America, for leaders in Latin America and the Arab world indicates that the ruler needs popular support for his program and approach, and the public's trust in the people and titles of power, and citizens' satisfaction with the performance of government institutions, and that this triangle of 'support, trust, and satisfaction' is not possible to achieve under the dominance of power by specific and limited individuals for many years, and the spread of corruption in the ruling political class, and the spread of poverty and unemployment, and the lack of opportunities for youth to engage in public work, and the prevention of participation in policymaking and the weakening of public ownership, and the failure of programs to meet people's needs; even if the president comes from the bottom of society, years of rule, its pomp, and its privileges make him forget the needs of his peers and those who came after him, the necessities of life." I stopped my friend, saying, "The Palestinian people have lost a leader who supported their cause." He interrupted me, anger evident in his voice; "The Palestinian people need leaders who believe in human rights in their countries, and who secure a dignified life for their peoples, and who invest their countries' wealth to fortify their societies, and to strengthen their nations, and the prosperity of their countries to contribute to global civilization, and they do not need leaders who squander their peoples' money and wealth in external shouting without caring about the country's internal issues." He concluded his speech, "If the Venezuelan people had accepted him, they would have come out en masse to defend the president, but the situation is apparently the opposite, as we did not see any movement at the necessary moments and hour of need; as the popular saying goes, 'He who is covered by other than the people is naked,' and this is the case of one who did not make the people his ally, and the warmth of his group and their pockets at the expense of the people, and tightened the grip of security on the necks of the people, and did not realize that national dignity among peoples does not mean clinging to the leader and his group, but in preserving the homeland and the safety of the country.


PALESTINE

Sat 10 Jan 2026 10:39 am - Jerusalem Time

Israel Escalates Aggression in Gaza: Killing as a Tool to Disrupt the American Path Towards Phase Two

Over the past twenty-four hours, Israel has escalated the pace of its aggressive military attacks on the Gaza Strip, resulting in the martyrdom of at least 15 Palestinians, including a number of children, according to medical sources and civil defense teams in the Strip. This escalation comes at a politically sensitive time, coinciding with American preparations to announce the transition to "Phase Two" of arrangements related to Gaza, which US President Donald Trump is expected to announce during his participation in the World Economic Forum in Davos, held between January 19 and 23.

However, this escalation cannot be separated from its broader political context, nor from a recurring Israeli pattern that employs military force as a tool to manage critical political moments. The recent attacks, which targeted densely populated residential areas in the central and southern parts of the Strip, as well as sites housing displaced persons, not only resulted in civilian casualties but also deepened the feeling that Israel deliberately seeks to re-impose the logic of the field whenever a political path that does not fully align with its security calculations appears on the horizon.

According to the Ministry of Health in Gaza, the majority of the victims are civilians, including children and women, at a time when ambulance and civil defense teams faced great difficulties in reaching the bombing sites, due to widespread destruction and lack of resources. These field realities clearly contradict the official Israeli narrative that repeatedly speaks of "striking precise targets," while targeting patterns indicate excessive and disproportionate use of force in one of the most densely populated areas in the world.

As in previous rounds, the Israeli occupation army was quick to justify its operations under the pretext of "preventing imminent security threats," reiterating its accusations against Palestinian factions of using civilians as human shields. However, these pretexts have become widely questioned by international human rights organizations, which confirm that Israel treats Gaza as an open military space, where there is no room for considerations of international humanitarian law or the principle of protecting civilians, especially children.

Most indicative in this context is the timing of the escalation itself. The American administration, according to diplomatic leaks, intended to use the Davos Forum platform to announce the transition to "Phase Two" of its plan for Gaza, a phase that is supposed to include new security and administrative arrangements, and perhaps initial indicators of reconstruction and a transitional governance framework for the Strip, without requiring the disarmament of Hamas as a prerequisite. This is viewed in Israel as a risky path, as it limits its ability to unilaterally control the future of the Strip.

From this perspective, analysts believe that the Israeli military escalation aims to disrupt this announcement or empty it of its content, by reproducing a scene of security chaos and sending a message that field conditions do not allow for any organized political transition. It is also not excluded that the goal is to exert indirect pressure on the American administration to push it to adopt a more hardline approach, consistent with the Israeli vision based on the priority of military force over any political path.

In contrast, international and American pressure on Israel appears to have limited effect. Despite the escalating calls to protect civilians and stop targeting children, these positions have so far not gone beyond statements and declarations. This reality is reinforced by the fact that the occupation army has violated the ceasefire in Gaza more than 500 times since its entry into force on October 10, 2025, without any meaningful political or legal accountability resulting from it.

Humanitarianly, the latest escalation exacerbates the tragedy of the residents of the Gaza Strip, who have lived for years under a suffocating siege and harsh living conditions. The infrastructure is almost collapsed, hospitals are operating beyond their capacity, while hundreds of thousands suffer from severe shortages of food, clean water, and safe shelter. Aid agencies warn that any new escalation, no matter how "limited" it may seem, will have devastating effects on civilians, who always pay the highest price.

In conclusion, Israeli behavior reflects a determination to reproduce an old, proven-to-be-failed equation, based on the belief that military force can impose permanent political realities. However, repeated experience in Gaza shows that this approach only leads to successive cycles of violence, without achieving sustainable security or real stability, neither for Palestinians nor even for Israel itself. Aborting any political path in its infancy, under the pretext of "security necessities," only means deepening the roots of the conflict and prolonging its duration.

The American administration finds itself once again facing a difficult test between its declared rhetoric of de-escalation and stability, and the practices of its Israeli ally on the ground. The inability to curb the escalation threatens to undermine the credibility of any upcoming American initiative, whether announced in Davos or elsewhere, and warns that the promised "Phase Two" may turn into a mere political cover for managing the crisis, rather than a serious step towards resolving it.

PALESTINE

Fri 09 Jan 2026 11:42 pm - Jerusalem Time

Bahbah: Peace Council to be announced next week, technocratic committee to manage Gaza on the horizon

Bahbah pointed to Israeli moves aimed at withdrawing recognition from a number of international relief organizations operating in Gaza, under the pretext of their hostility to the occupation.

Bishara Bahbah, head of the American-Arab Council for Peace, revealed a series of anticipated political developments aimed at shaping a new administration for the Gaza Strip and initiating reconstruction efforts.

These moves include the imminent announcement of the formation of the "Gaza Strip Peace Council" next week, with its first official meeting to be held on the sidelines of the "Davos" forum in the third week of this month.

Concurrently with this step, the Egyptian capital, Cairo, is expected to host a meeting of Palestinian factions next week to discuss the implications of the announcement of the Peace Council.

Read also: American media: Trump expects to announce next week the establishment of a peace council and the transition to the second phase in Gaza

This meeting is expected to be dedicated to announcing the names of the "Independent Technocratic Committee" tasked with managing the affairs of the Strip, which will include twelve members.

The anticipated timeline also includes the formation of the main bodies responsible for managing the comprehensive reconstruction file within thirty days.

In another context, Bahbah pointed to "Israeli" moves aimed at withdrawing recognition from a number of international relief organizations operating in Gaza, under the pretext of their hostility to the occupation, which may lead to the adoption of new mechanisms for distributing aid under the supervision of private companies owned by individuals.

Regarding movement at the crossings, the Jerusalemite academic linked the opening of the Rafah crossing to the handover of the last body held by the Palestinian side, considering that this step would remove any pretext for the occupation to continue the closure.

Bahbah concluded his message to the people of the Strip by expressing his understanding of the extent of suffering resulting from food shortages, lack of healthcare, and homelessness.

He expressed his hope that this year would be a radical turning point towards restoring the elements of a dignified life and improving living conditions in Gaza, in a way that meets the country's progress towards stability.

ARAB AND WORLD

Fri 09 Jan 2026 11:08 pm - Jerusalem Time

Deputy Spokesperson for the US State Department: Washington is closely monitoring the situation in Iran and is ready to support the Iranian people

Mignon Houston, Deputy Spokesperson for the US Department of State, said that the recent protests in Iran reflect the Iranian people's dissatisfaction with the lack of food, energy, and basic services, noting that the US government wishes to see Iran abandon its support for enemies and its nuclear and missile programs, and achieve a better life for its people.

She affirmed that Washington is closely monitoring the situation and is ready to support the Iranian people in achieving stability and a dignified life.

Houston clarified that the US administration's policy on all Middle East issues is "clear and transparent," emphasizing that the United States will remain committed to protecting its interests, working for regional stability, and achieving a secure and prosperous future for the concerned Arab peoples, while closely monitoring all field and political developments.

She added that the United States' policy towards Syria focuses on stability, prosperity, territorial integrity, and respect for minority rights, stressing the importance of preventing the use of Syrian territory as a safe haven for terrorist organizations or a source of threat to American and regional security.

She explained that the US administration seeks to ensure that the Syrian government uses its resources to support and protect the Syrian people, while calling for comprehensive dialogue among all Syrian parties to achieve the interests of the country and its people, affirming that Syria's future will be promising if the government and politicians commit to paths of cooperation and constructive solutions.

Regarding the American balance between the Syrian government and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), Houston said that the absolute priority is American national security, and that Washington is working with its regional partners to ensure that Syria does not become a haven for terrorist threats, noting that the United States expects the Syrian government to implement its security and political commitments within the framework of comprehensive solutions for the region.

Concerning the second phase of the US-sponsored peace plan in Gaza, Houston affirmed that the plan aims to end suffering and achieve stability for both Palestinians and Israelis, explaining that tangible progress has been made in the humanitarian and relief file since the agreement was signed, with thousands of trucks and humanitarian aid entering the sector, but she noted the necessity for the Hamas movement to adhere to the terms of the agreement, including disarmament and not obstructing reconstruction, to ensure the transition to the second phase of the plan.

She mentioned that the United States is working to form a Palestinian technocratic committee under the supervision of the Peace Council to ensure stable governance in Gaza, while monitoring the effectiveness of security and the stabilization force, affirming that the success of this phase is linked to the commitment of all concerned parties to the preconditions for the full completion of the transition.

PALESTINE

Fri 09 Jan 2026 11:08 pm - Jerusalem Time

Leaks about a "secret deal" between Netanyahu and Herzog.. a businessman talks about "amnesty" in exchange for the presidency

Herzog feared Netanyahu would nominate another Likud party figure who enjoyed right-wing support.

The "Israeli" businessman and strategic consultant, Moti Sander, dropped a heavy political bombshell by revealing the existence of a "secret deal" concluded five years ago between the president of the occupation state, Isaac Herzog, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to Sander's claim, this deal stipulated Netanyahu's support for Herzog's election as president in exchange for the latter granting Netanyahu a presidential pardon that would prevent his prosecution in the corruption cases attributed to him.

Moti Sander is an influential figure in the political circles of the occupation, having led successful election campaigns for prominent figures such as Ehud Barak, and has close ties with both Netanyahu and Herzog.

The revelation of this information came in an interview with Hebrew media, where Sander confirmed that he was Herzog's messenger to Netanyahu to propose this offer.

According to the details provided by Sander, Netanyahu and his wife Sara faced significant pressure to accept the deal to avoid imprisonment.

Sander recounted a moving scene in which Sara Netanyahu cried before her husband convinced her that this move was in their best interest.

Herzog feared that Netanyahu would nominate another Likud party figure who enjoyed right-wing support, or that Netanyahu himself would run for president to stop his prosecution process according to the law.

Sander explained that he decided to reveal this "scandal" now because Herzog went too far in trying to appease Netanyahu with a pardon that does not include admitting guilt or waiving the sentence, which Sander considered a crime against the purity of governance.

He affirmed that he is in favor of granting a pardon and stopping the trial that harms Israel, but on the condition that Netanyahu admits his guilt and completely retires from political life.

For its part, President Herzog's office strongly denied these allegations, emphasizing key points:

Denial of the deal: There was no agreement or understanding, whether explicit or implicit, linking the presidential elections to Netanyahu's legal files.

Pardon request: Any pardon request will only be processed according to the law and with the recommendation of the Pardon Department in the Ministry of Justice.

Sander's refutation: Herzog expressed his regret for what his friend Sander said, and rejected his claims, describing them as false and defamatory.

In contrast, the Likud party accused Sander of lying, while the latter responded that the attempt by Herzog's men to question his mental faculties under the pretext of "Alzheimer's" is a despicable attempt to tarnish his reputation and hide the truth.

These leaks place the presidency and the government in an embarrassing position before public opinion and the judiciary.

With the widening gap of mutual denial, the question remains about the extent of the impact of these allegations on the course of Netanyahu's cases pending before the courts, and whether they will lead to new investigations into suspicions of abuse of influence to immunize officials from legal accountability.