What after certifying unreasonableness?

The internal situation in the occupying state is going from bad to worse, especially in the aftermath of the Israeli Knesset's final approval yesterday of canceling the pretext of unreasonableness affecting the Israeli judiciary, especially the powers of the Supreme Court, in favor of the prime minister, ministers and other officials in the current government coalition, which is more right-wing, extremist and racist than the previous Israeli governments and perhaps the subsequent ones as well.

Strikes and protests will pervade the occupying state, starting today, which will paralyze economic life, in addition to the deterioration of relations between the coalition and the opposition, which will be reflected on Israeli society in general and on the relations of families with each other.

We have said more than once that the Israeli society based on the ruins of our people is moving rapidly towards right-wing and extremism, which found its repercussions not only on our people and the crimes committed against them, whether by the occupation forces or by herds of settlers, both of whom are supported by the government. Rather, this extended to the Israeli society itself, where internal contradictions emerged between Westerners and Easterners and between secularists and religious people who want to transform the occupying state into a religious one that derives its laws from the Torah and other religious books.

The endorsement of the abolition of the pretext of unreasonableness came despite the weekly and non-weekly demonstrations and the opposition of the United States of America and many Western countries that established the occupying state on Palestinian land and are still providing it with support and all elements of survival, including weapons that are used against our people.

Despite the multiplicity of possibilities, the transformation of the Israeli internal contradiction into a major contradiction is unlikely at the current stage, just as America's abandonment of the occupying state is also excluded at the current stage. The United States, through the Zionist lobby in America, will try not to escalate this internal contradiction, but to keep it within the framework of assimilation and not turn it into a major contradiction, especially since America is still counting on the occupying state to preserve its interests in the Arab region.

The occupying power can also freeze this contradiction by carrying out a new aggression against the Palestinians or southern Lebanon, and perhaps also Syria and Iran, which will unite the aggressive army and the opposition, as we saw in the attack on Jenin camp, where the opposition supported this aggression.

Therefore, we should not rely too much on the Israeli internal contradiction, even if benefiting from it is for the benefit of our people and its national cause, and the broad movement at all levels to reveal the reality of this aggressive and racist state that seeks to transform the conflict from political to religious may not remain or be left behind.