Tucker Carlson: Israel Represents the Greatest Burden on the United States Outside Its Borders

Prominent American journalist Tucker Carlson launched a sharp attack on the current nature of relations between Washington and Tel Aviv, considering that excessive attention to supporting Israel comes at the expense of escalating internal crises in the United States. Carlson affirmed that the Hebrew state has become the greatest burden on his country outside its geographical borders, pointing to the necessity of re-evaluating this political dependency.

In a television interview he conducted after a field visit to Israel, Carlson explained that the shared policies between the two parties have directly harmed supreme American interests. He stated that this assessment does not hold the Israeli government directly responsible, as it operates according to what serves its national agenda, but rather blames decision-makers in Washington who allow this drain.

Carlson indicated that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intelligently maneuvers to harness American resources to achieve his country's goals, which Carlson sees as logical from an Israeli perspective. However, he simultaneously expressed his astonishment at the surrender of American leaders to these pressures, questioning the reasons that drive them to prioritize the interests of an external party over their constituents.

Carlson touched upon the escalation with Tehran, revealing the existence of immense pressure within political circles in Washington to push for a military confrontation aimed at changing the regime in Iran. He considered that engaging in a proxy war on behalf of Israel would only lead to widespread chaos in the region, which does not serve the stability of the United States or its allies.

The American journalist questioned Israel's understanding of its long-term interests, explaining that the pursuit of destroying regional regimes could have counterproductive results for everyone. He believed that engaging in plans aimed at killing those in power in Iran without a clear vision for the future is a dangerous gamble lacking political and strategic wisdom.

Carlson stressed that the United States suffers from real structural dilemmas related to a faltering economy, an unregulated immigration crisis, and a decline in national unity among its citizens. He called on leaders in the White House and Congress to have sufficient strength to reject the demands dictated by Netanyahu, and instead focus on repairing the American domestic house.

In a direct message to decision-makers, Carlson called for adopting a firm stance towards Israeli desires to ignite tensions with Iran, suggesting that the American response should be to distance itself from these conflicts. He affirmed that any Israeli step towards Tehran should remain a private matter for Tel Aviv without involving the American military or treasury.

Carlson sharply criticized a number of US senators, describing them as showing loyalty to Israel that surpasses their loyalty to the United States itself. He specifically mentioned Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Lindsey Graham, accusing them of prioritizing Israeli demands over the needs of the American citizen who gave them their vote in the elections.

Carlson considered that this duality of loyalty represents the fundamental problem hindering the formulation of an independent and balanced American foreign policy. He explained that the influence exerted by pro-Israel lobbying groups within the halls of Congress has led to diverting the compass of American national priorities towards conflicts in which Washington has no stake.

These statements come at a time when the region is witnessing intensive American military reinforcements, driven by continuous Israeli incitement to strike the Iranian nuclear and missile program. Informed sources believe that Washington is brandishing the military option to force Tehran to make substantial concessions regarding its regional influence and strategic weapons.

For its part, Tehran continues to warn that American and Israeli moves are primarily aimed at changing the existing regime under false pretexts. The Iranian government promises a decisive and devastating response to any military aggression, while at the same time affirming its adherence to the necessity of lifting comprehensive economic sanctions as a condition for any nuclear understandings.

Observers linked Carlson's statements to the extreme positions expressed by the US Ambassador to Tel Aviv, Mike Huckabee, in a previous interview. Huckabee expressed his support for Israel's geographical expansion in the Middle East, based on what he described as biblical rights extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, which sparked a wave of condemnation.

Carlson believes that such statements from American officials reflect the depth of the crisis in understanding the national interests of the United States. He considered that being drawn into religious interpretations or the expansionist ambitions of external parties weakens the prestige of the American state and embroils it in endless religious and ethnic conflicts.

In conclusion, Carlson called for the necessity of restoring sovereignty over American political decision-making away from the influences of foreign capitals. He affirmed that America's true strength lies in its ability to say 'no' when the demands of allies conflict with its internal stability and the safety of its economic and human resources.

Israel is a very heavy burden on the United States, and in fact, it is the biggest burden we face outside our borders.