Security and political circles in Tel Aviv are in a state of high alert, coinciding with the approaching deadline set by US President Donald Trump for the nuclear negotiations in Geneva. Sources reported that assessments indicate a high probability of these talks collapsing next Sunday, which would open the door for direct American military options against Iranian facilities.
Media reports stated that the stalemate in the Geneva track is due to Tehran's adherence to firm positions, as it categorically rejected American demands related to removing its enriched uranium stockpile from its territory. The Iranian leadership also expressed complete rejection of committing to the principle of 'zero enrichment' permanently, considering it a تجاوز of its red lines in nuclear sovereignty.
In a related context, Iran rejects any proposals aimed at dismantling its sensitive nuclear infrastructure, especially the 'Fordow', 'Natanz', and 'Isfahan' facilities. These complexities have led military circles in Tel Aviv to conduct dramatically described situation assessments, to discuss scenarios of an expected Iranian response if it is subjected to an airstrike by Washington.
Intelligence estimates indicate that any upcoming confrontation will not be limited to one front, but will quickly turn into a 'multi-front' war. Military analysts believe that the Houthi group in Yemen will be the first party to engage in fighting alongside Tehran, by targeting Israeli depth with missiles and drones.
Sources warned of the repercussions of Hamas's involvement in this potential confrontation, as the occupation army's leadership has developed plans for the complete occupation of the Gaza Strip and the elimination of the remaining leadership structure of the movement if a front is opened from the Strip. This threat comes as part of deterrence attempts to prevent the expansion of the conflict to include Palestinian territories.
As for the northern front and the Iraqi arena, current estimates tend to suggest that Hezbollah and pro-Iranian militias in Iraq may prefer not to officially and directly join the confrontation in its initial stages. However, reports indicate increasing internal pressures within these organizations pushing for active participation to enhance the unity of the arenas.
Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, for its part, confirmed that preparations in Tel Aviv are taking place regardless of the final results of the Geneva talks, as the prevailing assumption is that failure is the most likely scenario. Operational plans are based on the premise that any American attack will be followed by an immediate and direct Iranian response targeting major cities and vital facilities within the occupied territories.
Estimates concluded that Tehran views any American military action as primarily serving Israeli interests, which increases the likelihood of retaliatory strikes against Tel Aviv. Accordingly, emergency and air defense agencies have stepped up their preparations to face scenarios of intense bombardment from different directions.
Any upcoming conflict will be multi-front, and if Hamas joins the confrontation, the direct meaning of that will be a complete occupation of the Strip and the elimination of the remaining leadership.





Share your opinion
High Alert in Tel Aviv as Trump's Deadline Nears: Expectations of a Multi-Front War and Collapse of Geneva Track