The world cannot implement the outcomes of the international conference for a two-state solution held in New York, which witnessed full international support for the Palestinian state in light of the American extremism and the statements made by the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives in the presence of the American ambassador to the occupation, in which he stated that the United States recognizes the historical right of the Israeli occupying state to sovereignty over the West Bank of the Jordan River, and that the mountains of "Judea and Samaria" were promised to the Jewish people.
These statements contradict all international legitimacy and international law, especially United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334, which was approved by all countries in the world, including the United States, and which considers settlement in all its forms illegal in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem. What the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives said is incorrect and completely contradicts what was signed in the Oslo Agreement in the U.S. capital, Washington, that the political process is based on international legitimacy, foremost of which is the realization of an independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.
The visit of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, at the head of a congressional delegation, to the "Ariel" settlement built on the lands of citizens in the occupied West Bank represents a dangerous bias towards the occupation and a violation of international law and United Nations and Security Council resolutions, and constitutes a blatant violation of United Nations resolutions, especially Security Council Resolution 2334, which affirms that Israeli colonial settlement is illegal in the occupied Palestinian territories since 1967, including East Jerusalem, and calls on all countries to differentiate in their dealings between the occupied territory of the State of Palestine and Israel.
The visit of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives to the settlement built on the lands of the occupied West Bank, especially in light of the recent Israeli threat to occupy all of Gaza, warns of further mass atrocities that the occupying army will commit and aligns with what is practically happening on the ground, including war crimes, starvation, and the deterioration of the humanitarian situation due to the genocide perpetrated by the extremist racist occupying government.
This step undermines the status of the United States as a permanent member of the Security Council and contradicts its legal and moral obligations. All forms of support for colonialism must be halted, and adherence to the principles of international legitimacy is essential, especially since the visit contributes to encouraging and continuing the crimes of colonialism and the organized terrorism of settlers against the Palestinian people. It serves to encourage and reward settlers for their crimes of killing, burning, and violence against the Palestinian people, and is considered direct support for policies of Judaization, annexation, and ethnic cleansing. It also represents a cover for the racist legislation issued by the Israeli Knesset to entrench the occupation and legitimize seizure, displacement, and apartheid.
These statements pose a challenge and provocation to the countries of the world that gathered in New York to uphold the two-state solution based on international law and legitimacy, including successive U.S. administrations, which paved the way for a series of important international recognitions of the State of Palestine during the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York next September.
The international community, led by the United States, must fulfill its political and legal obligations to pressure Israel, the occupying power, to stop all colonial policies and the terrorism of settlers and their daily crimes. The priority must be to achieve an immediate and permanent ceasefire, expedite the entry of humanitarian aid to stop the war of starvation, and comply with international law and relevant United Nations resolutions.





Share your opinion
American extremism positions contradict international legitimacy.